A Comparativist's Predicaments of Writing about 'Other' Education: A Self-Reflective, Critical Review of Studies of Japanese Education

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Takayama, Keita
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Comparative Education. 2011 47(4):449-470.
  • Publication Date:
    2011
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Reports - Evaluative
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      22
    • Subject Terms:
      Foreign Countries; Essays; Reflection; Comparative Education; Comparative Analysis; Ethnocentrism; Cultural Differences; Nationalism
    • Subject Terms:
      Australia; Canada; Japan; United Kingdom; United States
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/03050068.2011.561542
    • ISSN:
      0305-0068
    • Abstract:
      This self-reflexive essay teases out the predicaments that I have encountered through my past publishing experience, while situating them in a critical review of the existing English-language studies of Japanese education. Drawing on postcolonial theoretical insights and recent critical sociology of academic knowledge production, I use my personal experience as a starting point to identify the particular discursive structure of comparative education that constrains the articulation of "other" education in the field. My critical review of comparative studies of Japanese education demonstrates that many of them, including my own, unreflexively accept the subject positions offered by this discursive condition and thus further constrain space for those who write in English about "other" education and Japanese education in particular. In conclusion, I discuss recent studies of Japanese education that partially address the dilemmas raised in this paper and the wider implications of this study for the field of comparative education. (Contains 12 notes.)
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Number of References:
      120
    • Publication Date:
      2012
    • Accession Number:
      EJ952713