Post-Instrument Bias in Linear Models

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Adam N. Glynn; Miguel R. Rueda (ORCID Miguel R. Rueda (ORCID 0000-0001-7365-7722); Julian Schuessler (ORCID Julian Schuessler (ORCID 0000-0002-8604-7699)
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Sociological Methods & Research. 2024 53(4):1829-1845.
  • Publication Date:
    2024
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Information Analyses
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: https://sagepub.com
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      17
    • Subject Terms:
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/00491241231156965
    • ISSN:
      0049-1241
      1552-8294
    • Abstract:
      Post-instrument covariates are often included as controls in instrumental variable (IV) analyses to address a violation of the exclusion restriction. However, we show that such analyses are subject to biases unless strong assumptions hold. Using linear constant-effects models, we present asymptotic bias formulas for three estimators (with and without measurement error): IV with post-instrument covariates, IV without post-instrument covariates, and ordinary least squares. In large samples and when the model provides a reasonable approximation, these formulas sometimes allow the analyst to bracket the parameter of interest with two estimators and allow the analyst to choose the estimator with the least asymptotic bias. We illustrate these points with a discussion of the settler mortality IV used by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1444065