Testing the Effects of a Utility Value Intervention in an Online Research Methods Course: A Conceptual Replication of Hulleman Et Al. (2017, Study 2)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: https://sagepub.com
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      9
    • Sponsoring Agency:
      National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DHHS)
    • Contract Number:
      R25GM131956
    • Education Level:
      Higher Education
      Postsecondary Education
    • Subject Terms:
      Online Courses; Research Methodology; Intervention; Undergraduate Students; Psychology; Public Colleges; Instructional Effectiveness; Value Judgment; Teaching Methods; Academic Achievement; Scores; Student Interests
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/00986283221101850
    • ISSN:
      0098-6283
      1532-8023
    • Abstract:
      Background: Utility-value (UV) classroom interventions typically involve students completing assignments that involve writing about the usefulness of the course material. They are widely recommended and have received some empirical support. Objective: This study tested the effectiveness of a UV intervention in an online research methods course. It was a conceptual replication of a study by Hulleman et al. (2017, Study 2). Method: Students (N = 264) were randomly assigned to complete three assignments that required them to write about the usefulness of course material or three assignments that required them to summarize course material. The groups were compared in terms of their scores on a research methods knowledge test, their final papers, their final exams, and their final point totals, along with measures of the interestingness and usefulness of the course material. Results: There were no differences between conditions on any of the outcome variables. Conclusion: The UV intervention was ineffective. Further research is needed to establish the conditions under which such interventions are and are not effective. Teaching Implications: UV interventions do not necessarily improve student performance. Instructors who use them should consider doing so in a way that allows for an assessment of their effect in their local context.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1427306