Digital Twins and the Terminology of 'Personalization' or 'Personalized Learning' in Educational Policy: A Discussion Paper

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Janine Arantes (ORCID Janine Arantes (ORCID 0000-0002-0301-5780)
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Policy Futures in Education. 2024 22(4):524-543.
  • Publication Date:
    2024
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Reports - Evaluative
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: https://sagepub.com
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      20
    • Education Level:
      Elementary Secondary Education
    • Subject Terms:
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/14782103231176357
    • ISSN:
      1478-2103
    • Abstract:
      There has been a policy push in K-12 educational settings towards personalized learning in the last decade. Commercial platforms and learning designers have responded, offering learning tools to support teaching and learning through data-driven insights and recommendations. Trending towards the augmentation or replacing human teachers with non-human technology, this paper argues that personalized learning with human teachers is an entirely different process from personalization with digital twins. Drawing on new materialist thinking, it explores the impacts and implications for discourse concerning teacher quality and disadvantages within educational systems. It clarifies the conflation of the terms "personalized learning" and "personalization" to illuminate the power, positionality, and privilege enabled for some, in conflating terms in Australian educational policy.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1422094