Considerations for Mental Health Screening and Referrals: Implications from a School-University Case Study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Victor Villarreal (ORCID Victor Villarreal (ORCID 0000-0002-5612-3849)
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Journal of Applied School Psychology. 2024 40(1):62-82.
  • Publication Date:
    2024
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Reports - Research
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      21
    • Education Level:
      Junior High Schools
      Middle Schools
      Secondary Education
      Higher Education
      Postsecondary Education
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/15377903.2023.2236958
    • ISSN:
      1537-7903
      1537-7911
    • Abstract:
      School-based mental health screening has been identified as a major component of social, emotional, and behavioral multitiered systems of support models, and a promising practice that can be used to address unmet mental health needs of children and adolescents. However, there are frequently noted concerns about the feasibility of implementing school-based screening programs. In this case study, findings from a school-university partnership, intended to address the most commonly reported screening concerns while reducing screening burdens on the school, are described. Students enrolled in a public middle school in a large, urban city in central Texas completed the self-report version of the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. Participation in initial school-based screening was high (n = 390), with 35.9% of participants considered at-risk. Screening results informed immediate school-based counseling. However, subsequent screening and comprehensive evaluation for at-risk students--completed at an external university clinic--were low. Implications of these findings, as well as recommendations based on the study methods and related literature, are discussed.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Publication Date:
      2024
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1406734