An Investigation of the Factor Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Bart, William M.; Hokanson, Brad; Can, Iclal
  • Language:
    English
  • Source:
    Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. Apr 2017 17(2):515-528.
  • Publication Date:
    2017
  • Document Type:
    Journal Articles
    Reports - Research
  • Additional Information
    • Availability:
      Educational Consultancy, Ltd (EDAM). Kisikli Mh. Alemdag Cd. Yan Yol Sk., SBK Is Merkezi No:5 Kat:1, Uskudar-Istanbul, 34692 Turkey. Tel: +90-216-481-30-23; Fax: +90-216-481-31-36; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.estp.com.tr/
    • Peer Reviewed:
      Y
    • Source:
      14
    • Education Level:
      Secondary Education
      Grade 8
      Junior High Schools
      Middle Schools
      Elementary Education
      Grade 11
      High Schools
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • Subject Terms:
    • ISSN:
      1303-0485
    • Abstract:
      This study investigated the factorial structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) Figural Form A with an aim to find out whether the two-factor structure of creative thinking established by Kim and Kim, Cramond, and Bandalos holds true for the older participants. Data were gathered from 996 8th grade students and 748 11th grade students from a suburban public school system in Minnesota. Based on previous research and Kirton's Adaption-Innovation (KAI) theory, one and two-factor models were tested in the study. Upon checking the related assumptions, confirmatory factor analyses with Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation were conducted using LISREL 8.71. The results indicated that a two-factor model established by Kim and her colleagues was a better fit than a one-factor model. This shows that fluency and originality load onto the latent variable termed the innovative factor, elaboration and abstractness of titles load onto the latent variable termed the adaptive factor, and resistance to premature closure loads on both latent variables. Our results suggest that any efforts to assess and promote creativity should take into consideration the two domains of creativity posited in KAI theory.
    • Abstract:
      As Provided
    • Number of References:
      33
    • Publication Date:
      2017
    • Accession Number:
      EJ1147507