Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
COMPARING COVARIANCE STRUCTURES using DIFFERENT OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES in GLMM on SOME SEXUAL BEHAVIORS of MALE LAMBS.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Ser, G.1 ; Yeşilova, A.1; Yılmaz, A.2
- Source:
JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. Dec2013, Vol. 23 Issue 6, p1583-1587. 5p. 2 Charts.
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Abstract:
This study is concerned with use of generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) to analyse the repeated measurements based on count data obtained from the sexual behaviors of male lambs. A combination of different optimization techniques and covariance structures were applied to four constructed models. These models were defined in terms of random effect specifications. Therefore, residuals was assumed to be random (Model A), intercept assumed to be random effect (Model B), time (slope) assumed to be random effect (Model C) and both intercept and time assumed to be random effects (Model D). Five different techniques quasi-newton (QUANEW), newton-raphson (NEWRAP), trust region (TRUREG), newton-raphson ridge (NRRIDG) and double-dogleg (DBLDOG) optimization techniques were used for analyzing these models. Three different covariance structures compound symmetry (CS), unstructured (UN) and first-order autoregressive (AR(1)) were used. In conclusion, based on likelihood criteria, the Model A with CS structure outperformed other models for the repeated measurement data of sexual behavior characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences is the property of Knowledge Bylanes and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.