Who Guards the Guardians?

The scope of this study is to document and discuss the vulnerability of athletes in doping cases – a consequence of the lack of transparency of anti-doping science, the strict liability principle and sport's arbitration system which denies athletes the possibility to have their cases tried in a proper court. After a brief presentation of the EU Athletes' call for involvement and change, this study introduces the concept ‘corrupt idealism’ which facilitates the understanding of anti-doping authorities' credibility problem. This study shows the historical prerequisites for the evolvement of this problem and presents and discusses a couple of controversial cases which expose the uncertain and pseudo-despotic nature of the system. This study concludes that an independent body financed by the working athletes unions should be established to oversee the work of anti-doping authorities and be involved in the development and administration of the anti-doping regulations. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of International Journal of the History of Sport is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)