Inside a Chinese Communist Municipal Newspaper: Purges at the Beijing Daily.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
      BEIJING (China); CHINA
    • Subject Terms:
      CHINESE Communist Party
    • Subject Terms:
      MAO, Zedong, 1893-1976
    • Abstract:
      The Beijing Daily, the flagship media outlet of the Beijing Municipal Party, was one of the most influential newspapers established in the early years of the People’s Republic of China. The newspaper’s principal purpose was to propagate the remarkable achievements of the Chinese Communist Party and to demonstrate the superiority of the Chinese socialist system over the capitalist one. Newly available archival sources reveal a depressing and disturbing story behind the façade of authoritative reporting: an interlocking system of control of editorial management, stringent censorship, skillful manipulation of news, and carefully selected readers’ letters in praise of the Communist regime. In the early 1960s, in contrast to the harmonious picture of Chinese society depicted by the newspaper, senior editorial staff were caught in the middle of life-and-death ideological infighting between the radical Maoists and the pragmatists in the central Party leadership. The staff used a variety of techniques – double talk, fence-sitting, paying lip service to the official lines and conducting self-criticism – to navigate through the perilous political shoals. But they were eventually purged by the Maoists during the Cultural Revolution for siding with the pragmatists. Chinese journalists, including the Beijing Daily staff who worked in the system, lived a precarious life in the authoritarian environment. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of Contemporary History is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)