A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the United States.

This study examines the annual reports of 100 United States (US) institutions of higher education to determine identifiable and measurable factors associated with extent of disclosure. Each disclosure was weighted by its relative importance to users of college and university financial statements. The measurement construct for extent of disclosure was the ratio of an institution’s total disclosure score to its total possible disclosure score. Institution size and public/private status were associated with total extent of disclosure but leverage and audit firm size were not significant. Extent of disclosure of non-financial performance information (service efforts and accomplishments) was associated with high tuition rates and low dependence on tuition revenue and with state auditors as opposed to public accounting firm auditors. The findings are consistent with accountability and public interest tenets (Coy, D., Fischer, M., Gordon, T., 2001. Public accountability: a new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 (1), 1–31). Highly visible institutions, those larger in size or audited by the state, disclosed more information. Moreover, some institutions used a corporate-style report to better promote their interests. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Copyright of Journal of Accounting & Public Policy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)