Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Earthquake conversations.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Stein, Ross S.
- Source:
Scientific American. Jan2003, Vol. 288 Issue 1, p72-79. 8p. 6 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram, 1 Graph.
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
For decades, earthquake experts dreamed of being able to divine the time and place of the world's next disastrous shock. But by the early 1990s the behavior of quake-prone faults had proved so complex that they were forced to conclude that the planet's largest tremors are isolated, random and utterly unpredictable. Most seismologists now assume that once a major earthquake and its expected aftershocks do their damage, the fault will remain quiet until stresses in the earth's crust have time to rebuild, typically over hundreds or thousands of years. At the heart of this hypothesis--known as stress triggering--is the realization that faults are unexpectedly responsive to subtle stresses they acquire as neighboring faults shift and shake. Drawing on records of past tremors and novel calculations of fault behavior, my colleagues and I have learned that the stress relieved during an earthquake does not simply dissipate; instead it moves down the fault and concentrates in sites nearby. Contradicting the nearly universal theory that major earthquakes strike at random was challenging from the start-especially considering that hundreds of scientists searched in vain for more than three decades to find predictable patterns in global earthquake activity, or seismicity. That big leap in probability explains why no one was initially surprised in June 1992 when a magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck near the southern California town of Big Bear only three hours after a magnitude 7.3 shock occurred 40 kilometers away, near Landers. By mapping the locations of Landers, Big Bear and hundreds of other California earthquakes, my colleagues and I began to notice a remarkable pattern in the distribution not only of true aftershocks but also of other, smaller earthquakes that follow a main shock by days, weeks or even years. INSETS: Forecasting under Stress;STRESSED OUT;EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS.
No Comments.