Debate: Whether abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery should be centralized at higher-volume centers.

LONDON (England); ENGLAND

Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery have become increasingly relevant in recent years. At the individual surgeon level, increased experience has been linked with improved patient outcomes after volume-outcome and learning curve analyses. At the hospital level, further analyses have generally shown a similar relationship linking the busier hospitals with improved outcomes. However, is this relationship sufficient and robust enough to support important health care delivery decisions regarding centralization of care? In England, such information has helped to shape the vascular surgery reorganization process in London. The following discussion presents the advantages and disadvantages of the practical use of such information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Vascular Surgery is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)