Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Kung slår dam - våldsforskningsmetodologi i ett våldsamt jämställt Sverige. (Swedish)
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Westerstrand, Jenny
- Source:
Sociologisk Forskning - Journal of the Swedish Sociological Association; 2010, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p5-34, 30p
- Subject Terms:
- Additional Information
- Alternate Title:
King Captures Queen. Methodology in research on violence in violently equal Sweden. (English)
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Research and debate on violence against women in a Swedish context is here discussed from a perspective that focuses on the different understandings and epistemological claims behind existing positions. I crystallize a dominant perspective on violence, centred around fragmentation/deviance, and a challenging feminist understanding, centred around coherence/normality. I relate these understandings to a wider set of methodological choices and epistemological claims within research on violence against women, captured in what I call a discourse on partner violence (fragmentation) and a feminist discourse on men's violence against women (coherence). The article also examines the reactions, in media and academic life, that a quantitative study on men's violence against women in Sweden provoked, Captured Queen, Men's violence against women in equal Sweden. A prevalence study (Lundgren et al 2001). By applying a coherent methodological approach, stemming from the feminist discourse on violence against women, the study seems to have placed itself outside what was comprehensible for many voices in the debate (from media and the academic field). I discuss the hostile reactions the study aroused, in relation to its methodology and the above presented conflicting understandings that occupy the research field "violence against women". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Sociologisk Forskning - Journal of the Swedish Sociological Association is the property of Sveriges Sociologforbund and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.