The article discusses a case between the Christian Legal Society (CLS) and the University of California (UC) Hastings College of the Law concerning the school's implementation of its nondiscrimination policy. It explores whether the public law school can be compelled to finance CLS' activities and be permitted to use the school's name and facilities even if the group has admitted that it chooses its members and officers based on religion and sexual orientation. It also cites several similar cases including Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees.
Processing Request
No Comments.