STRUKTURA IZVLEČKOV S PODROČJA MATERIALOV IN TEHNOLOGIJ.

Ljubljana (Slovenia); Slovenia

We investigated the structure of abstracts in Slovenian and international journals in the field of materials and technology. The aim of the study was to analyze the adherence of the abstracts published in Materials and Technology (MIT) and Materials Science and Technology (MST) to two different instructions for the preparation of abstracts (scheme based on ISO 214:1976 and Spanring system). 25 abstracts from each journal were divided into sentences. We tried to place the sentences into one of the categories of the above mentioned schemes. The research was a part of the postgraduate study in the Department of Library and Information Science and Book Studies (Faculty of Arts, Ljubljana) in September and October 2008. There are no important differences between MIT and MST. Spanring system seems more appropriate for the field of materials and technology. The place and the time of the research should be added to abstracts and the Hu-bit category should be distributed into two parts: Hu- M (method) and Hu-R (results). The recommended Spanring system should be harmonized with authors, who publish in these serials and the effect of the instructions should be analyzed, too. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zanimala nas je struktura izvlečkov slovenskih in tujih revij s področja materialov in tehnologij. Namen in cilj raziskave je bil preveriti ustreznost izvlečkov člankov, objavljenih v revijah Materiali in tehnologije (MIT) in Materials Science and Technology (MST), glede na dve različni vrsti navodil za pripravo izvlečkov (shema, zasnovana glede na standard ISO 214:1976, ter shema Spanringovih informemov). Petindvajset izvlečkov iz vsake revije je bilo razdeljenih na povedi, ki se jih je skušalo uvrstiti v eno izmed kategorij obeh shem. Raziskava je bila izvedena v okviru podiplomskega študija na Oddelku za bibliotekarstvo, informacijsko znanost in knjigarstvo Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani in je potekala septembra in oktobra 2008. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se za področje materialov in tehnologij zdijo Spanringovi informemi uporabnejši od strukture, ki jo priporoča standard ISO-214:1976, ter da ni pomembnejših razlik med revijama MIT in MST, niti glede na strukturno shemo ISO niti glede na Spanringove informeme. Avtorje bi bilo treba opozoriti, naj v svojem izvlečku opredelijo tudi kraj in čas raziskave ter razmislijo o razdelitvi informema Hu na dva dela: Hu-M (metoda) in Hu-R (rezultati). Priporočeno shemo Spanringovih informemov bi bilo potrebno uskladiti z avtorji, ki objavljajo v teh revijah, in nato preveriti učinek navodil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]