Menu
×
Edisto Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Today's Hours
Edisto Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 869-2355
Wando Mount Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6888
West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-6635
Village Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 884-9741
St. Paul's/Hollywood Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 889-3300
Otranto Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 572-4094
Mt. Pleasant Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 849-6161
McClellanville Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 887-3699
Keith Summey North Charleston Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 744-2489
Hurd/St. Andrews Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 766-2546
Folly Beach Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 588-2001
Dorchester Road Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 552-6466
John L. Dart Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 722-7550
Main Library
2 p.m. – 5 p.m.
Phone: (843) 805-6930
Bees Ferry West Ashley Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6892
John's Island Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 559-1945
Baxter-Patrick James Island
Closed
Phone: (843) 795-6679
Edgar Allan Poe/Sullivan's Island Library
Closed for renovations
Phone: (843) 883-3914
Mobile Library
Closed
Phone: (843) 805-6909
Patron Login
menu
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Muffled olfactory and sensory cues from the reproductive stage soybean selectively reduce oviposition of a major polyphagous herbivore, fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda).
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Author(s): Gandham K;Gandham K; Gautam M; Gautam M; George J; George J; Reddy GVP; Reddy GVP; Kariyat R; Kariyat R
- Source:
Pest management science [Pest Manag Sci] 2024 Dec 22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Dec 22.- Publication Type:
Journal Article- Language:
English - Source:
- Additional Information
- Publication Information: Ahead of Print
- Source: Publisher: Published for SCI by Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100898744 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1526-4998 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1526498X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pest Manag Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information: Original Publication: West Sussex, UK : Published for SCI by Wiley, c2000-
- Abstract: Background: While the mother knows best/preference performance hypothesis has been well tested in natural ecosystems, how these ecological principles differ in agroecosystems is less explored. In this study, we investigated the ovipositional preference and offspring performance of fall armyworm (FAW) across vegetative and reproductive stages of soybean.
Results: We examined trichomes, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and assessed electroantennogram (EAG) measurements to understand how olfactory responses are affected by volatiles at different phenological stages during photoperiodism (photophase and scotophase). We found that gravid FAW preferred the vegetative compared to reproductive stage of soybean. Although VOC and EAG responses was not statistically different (P > 0.05) between photophase and scotophase, but vegetative stage exhibited significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher emissions and responses than the reproductive stage during both photophase and scotophase. Additionally, reproductive stage had lower trichomes compared to the vegetative stage. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in offspring performance between the vegetative and reproductive stages of soybean. This suggests that oviposition preference does not necessarily correlate with offspring performance, which was confirmed through offspring mass and mass gain studies. Olfactory and sensory cues from soybean at reproductive stage reduced oviposition by mother FAW.
Conclusion: Collectively, we show that while mother knows best may not fit FAW-Soybean interaction, muffled volatile emission in reproductive stages can have positive consequences for host success. The results from this study will enhance our understanding of FAW behavior across different phenological stages of host plants, that can be used to develop alternative and sustainable management strategies. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.) - References: Martínez G, Soler R and Dicke M, Behavioral ecology of oviposition‐site selection in herbivorous true bugs. Adv Study Behav 45:175–207 (2013).
Scheirs J, De Bruyn L and Verhagen R, Optimization of adult performance determines host choice in a grass miner. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:2065–2069 (2000).
Mayhew PJ, Herbivore host choice and optimal bad motherhood. Trends Ecol Evol 16:165–167 (2001).
Al Bitar L, Gorb SN, Zebitz CPW and Voigt D, Egg adhesion of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to various substrates: I. Leaf surfaces of different apple cultivars. Arthropod Plant Interact 6:471–488 (2012).
Salerno G, Rebora M, Piersanti S, Büscher TH, Gorb EV and Gorb SN, Oviposition site selection and attachment ability of Propylea quatuordecimpunctata and Harmonia axyridis from the egg to the adult stage. Physiol Entomol 47:20–37 (2022).
Resetarits WJ and Wilbur HM, Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70:220–228 (1989).
Morse DH, Where should I lay my eggs? Oviposition choices of a shelter‐building moth and the shifting danger of being parasitized. Entomol Exp Appl 165:1–8 (2017).
Vieira C and Romero GQ, Maternal care in a neotropical jumping spider (Salticidae). J Zool 276:237–241 (2008).
Ghosh E, Sasidharan A, Ode PJ and Venkatesan R, Oviposition preference and performance of a specialist herbivore is modulated by natural enemies, larval odors, and immune status. J Chem Ecol 48:670–682 (2022).
Guo JF, Zhang MD, Gao ZP, Wang DJ, He KL and Wang ZY, Comparison of larval performance and oviposition preference of Spodoptera frugiperda among three host plants: potential risks to potato and tobacco crops. Insect Sci 28:602–610 (2021).
Sotelo‐Cardona P, Chuang WP, Lin MY, Chiang MY and Ramasamy S, Oviposition preference not necessarily predicts offspring performance in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on vegetable crops. Sci Rep 11:15885 (2021).
Machado G and Oliveira PS, Maternal care in the neotropical harvestman Bourguyia albiornata (Arachnida: Opiliones): oviposition site selection and egg protection. Behaviour 139:1509–1524 (2002).
Osses F, Martins EG and Machado G, Oviposition site selection by the bromeliad‐dweller harvestman Bourguyia hamata (Arachnida: Opiliones). J Ethol 26:233–241 (2008).
Messas YF, Souza HS, Gonzaga MO and Vasconcellos‐Neto J, Spatial distribution and substrate selection by the orb‐weaver spider Eustala perfida Mello‐Leitão, 1947 (Araneae: Araneidae). J Nat Hist 48:2645–2660 (2014).
Kariyat RR, Balogh CM, Moraski RP, de Moraes CM, Mescher MC and Stephenson AG, Constitutive and herbivore‐induced structural defenses are compromised by inbreeding in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 100:1014–1021 (2013).
Rahman Shah MM, Zhang Z, Hu J, Gaber A and Hossain A, Impact of leaf trichomes of tomatoes and weeds on the host selection and developmental bioassays of Bemisia tabaci Q and a cryptic species. Heliyon 9:e20077 (2023).
Al Bitar L, Gorb SN, Zebitz CPW and Voigt D, Egg adhesion of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to various substrates: II. Fruit surfaces of different apple cultivars. Arthropod Plant Interact 8:57–77 (2014).
López Carretero P, Pekas A, Stubsgaard L, Sancho Blanco G, Lütken H and Sigsgaard L, Glandular trichomes affect mobility and predatory behavior of two aphid predators on medicinal cannabis. Biol Control 170:104932 (2022).
Permana AD, Johari A, Putra RE, Sastrodihardjo S and Admad I, The influence of trichome characters of soybean (Glycine max Merrill) on oviposition preference of soybean pod borer Etiella zinckenella Treitschke (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Indonesia. J Entomol Nematol 4:15–21 (2012).
Justus KA, Dosdall LM and Mitchell BK, Oviposition by Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and effects of phylloplane waxiness. J Econ Entomol 93:1152–1159 (2000).
Schröder R and Hilker M, The relevance of background odor in resource location by insects: a behavioral approach. Bioscience 58:308–316 (2008).
Damodaram KJP, Kempraj V, Aurade RM, Rajasekhar SB, Venkataramanappa RK, Nandagopal B et al., Centuries of domestication has not impaired oviposition site‐selection function in the silkmoth, Bombyx mori. Sci Rep 4:7472 (2014).
Reisenman CE, Riffell JA, Bernays EA and Hildebrand JG, Antagonistic effects of floral scent in an insect‐plant interaction. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:2371–2379 (2010).
Bertea CM, Casacci LP, Bonelli S, Zampollo A and Barbero F, Chemical, physiological and molecular responses of host plants to lepidopteran egg‐laying. Front Plant Sci 10:1768 (2020).
Van Asch M, Julkunen‐Tiito R and Visser ME, Maternal effects in an insect herbivore as a mechanism to adapt to host plant phenology. Funct Ecol 24:1103–1109 (2010).
Fei M, Harvey JA, Yin Y and Gols R, Oviposition preference for young plants by the large cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae) does not strongly correlate with Caterpillar performance. J Chem Ecol 43:617–629 (2017).
Krishnarao G, Genetic diversity, insecticide resistance development and semiochemicals synergism of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Entomology, OUAT, Bhubaneswar) (2022).
Kariyat RR, Mauck KE, Balogh CM, Stephenson AG, Mescher MC and De Moraes CM, Inbreeding in horsenettle (solanum carolinense) alters night‐time volatile emissions that guide oviposition by manduca sexta moths. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20130020 (2013).
Sisay B, Sevgan S, Weldon CW, Krüger K, Torto B and Tamiru A, Responses of the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) to different host plants: implications for its management strategy. Pest Manag Sci 79:845–856 (2023).
Hartman GL, West ED and Herman TK, Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean‐worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Secur 3:5–17 (2011).
Greene AD, Reay‐Jones FPF, Kirk KR, Peoples BK and Greene JK, Associating site characteristics with distributions of pestiferous and predaceous arthropods in soybean. Environ Entomol 50:477–488 (2021).
Way MO, Status of soybean insect pests in the United States, in Handbook of Soybean Insect Pests. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, MD (1994).
Souza BHS, Costa EN, Ribeiro ZA, Perlatti B, Cruz MCP, Forim MR et al., Soybean leaf age and plant stage influence expression of resistance to velvetbean caterpillar and fall armyworm. Chem 31:377–390 (2021).
Ayala J, Vasquez A, Balakrishnan D, Madrigal E, George J and Kariyat R, Effects of fast and slow‐wilting soybean genotypes on fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) growth and development. Commun Integr Biol 17:2354421 (2024).
Pitre HN, Mulrooney JE and Hogg DB, Fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) oviposition: crop preferences and egg distribution on Plants. J Econ Entomol 76:463–466 (1983).
Do Valle GE, Lourenção AL and Pinheiro JB, Adult attractiveness and oviposition preference of Bemisia tabaci biotype B in soybean genotypes with different trichome density. J Pest Sci 2004:431–442 (2012).
Kariyat RR, Mauck KE, De Moraes CM, Stephenson AG and Mescher MC, Inbreeding alters volatile signalling phenotypes and influences tri‐trophic interactions in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense L.). Ecol Lett 15:301–309 (2012).
Thompson JN and Pellmyr O, Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89 (1991).
Yactayo‐Chang JP, Mendoza J, Willms SD, Rering CC, Beck JJ and Block AK, Zea mays volatiles that influence oviposition and feeding behaviors of Spodoptera frugiperda. J Chem Ecol 47:799–809 (2021).
Park KC, Ochieng SA, Zhu J and Baker TC, Odor discrimination using insect electroantennogram responses from an insect antennal array. Chem Senses 27:343–352 (2002).
Ramiaranjatovo G, Reynaud B and Jacob V, Triple electroantennography captures the range and spatial arrangement of olfactory sensory neuron response on an insect antenna. J Neurosci Methods 390:109842 (2023).
Ngumbi E, Chen L and Fadamiro H, Electroantennogram (EAG) responses of Microplitis croceipes and Cotesia marginiventris and their lepidopteran hosts to a wide array of odor stimuli: correlation between EAG response and degree of host specificity? J Insect Physiol 56:1260–1268 (2010).
Wang J, Wei J, Yi T, Li YY, Xu T, Chen L et al., A green leaf volatile, (Z)‐3‐hexenyl‐acetate, mediates differential oviposition by Spodoptera frugiperda on maize and rice. BMC Biol 21:140 (2023).
Singh S and Kariyat RR, Exposure to polyphenol‐rich purple corn pericarp extract restricts fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) growth. Plant Signal Behav 15:1784545 (2020).
Kariyat RR, Raya CE, Chavana J, Cantu J, Guzman G and Sasidharan L, Feeding on glandular and non‐glandular leaf trichomes negatively affect growth and development in tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) caterpillars. Arthropod Plant Interact 13:321–333 (2019).
Yan XZ, Wang ZY, Ma L, Song CF, Zhao JY, Wang CZ et al., Electroantennogram and behavioural responses of Plutella xylostella to volatiles from the non‐host plant Mentha spicata. J Appl Entomol 147:511–519 (2023).
Parepally SK, Krishnarao G, Vyas M, Divija SD and Jayanthi PDK, Identification of chemosensory genes in the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Curr Sci 124:505–512 (2023).
Kundu P, Grover S, Perez A, Raya Vaca JD, Kariyat R and Louis J, Sorghum defense responses to sequential attack by insect herbivores of different feeding guilds. Planta 258:35 (2023).
Fajemisin A, Kaur S, Vasquez A, Racelis A and Kariyat R, Can trap color affect arthropod community attraction in agroecosystems? A test using yellow vane and colorless traps. Environ Monit Assess 195:366 (2023).
Kaur I and Kariyat R, Trichomes mediate plant–herbivore interactions in two Cucurbitaceae species through pre‐ and post‐ingestive ways. J Pest Sci (2004) 96:1077–1089 (2023).
Gautam M, Shafi I and Kariyat R, Compensation of physiological traits under drought and herbivory has functional consequences for fitness in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). Environ Exp Bot 226:105944 (2024).
R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2023).
Silva DM, Bueno AD, Andrade K, Stecca CD, Neves PM and Oliveira MC, Biology and nutrition of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed on different food sources. Sci Agric 74:18–31 (2017).
Parepely SK, Kempraj V, Sanganahalli Dharanesh D, Krishnarao G and Pagadala Damodaram KJ, The greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (L.) uses two different sensory modalities to evaluate the suitability of potential oviposition sites. Sci Rep 13:211 (2023).
Fatouros NE, Lucas‐Barbosa D, Weldegergis BT, Pashalidou FG, van Loon JJA, Dicke M et al., Plant volatiles induced by herbivore egg deposition affect insects of different trophic levels. PLoS One 7:e43607 (2012).
Krishnarao G, Molecular Insights of Populations Diveristy, Olfaction and Diapause in Red Banded Mango Caterpillar, Deanolis Sublimbalis Snellen (Creambidae: Lepidoptera). Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari (2017).
Qiu L, He L, Tan X, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Li X et al., Identification and phylogenetics of Spodoptera frugiperda chemosensory proteins based on antennal transcriptome data. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics 34:100680 (2020).
Rostás M and Eggert K, Ontogenetic and spatio‐temporal patterns of induced volatiles in Glycine max in the light of the optimal defence hypothesis. Chem 18:29–38 (2008).
Gonçalves J, Rodrigues JVC, Santos‐Amaya OF, Paula‐Moraes SV and Pereira EJG, The oviposition behavior of fall armyworm moths is unlikely to compromise the refuge strategy in genetically modified Bt crops. J Pest Sci 93:965–977 (2020).
Beyaert I and Hilker M, Plant odour plumes as mediators of plant‐insect interactions. Biol Rev 89:68–81 (2014).
Chen P, Dai C, Liu H and Hou M, Identification of key headspace volatile compounds signaling preference for rice over corn in adult females of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. J Agric Food Chem 70:9826–9833 (2022).
Sharanappa CH, Bheemanna M, Prabhuraj A, Naik HR, Naik NM, Rao SN et al., Investigation on the insecticidal activities of cyanobacterial extracts as an alternative source for the management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Heliyon 10:e29060 (2024).
Abed‐Vieillard D and Cortot J, When choice makes sense: menthol influence on mating, oviposition and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Front Integr Neurosci 10:5 (2016).
Gunderson CA, Samuelian JH, Evans CK and Brattsten LB, Effects of the mint monoterpene pulegone on Spodoptera eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 14:859–863 (1985).
Baur R, Feeny P and Städler E, Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles. J Chem Ecol 19:919–937 (1993).
Arnold SEJ, Forbes SJ, Hall DR, Farman DI, Bridgemohan P, Spinelli GR et al., Floral odors and the interaction between pollinating ceratopogonid midges and cacao. J Chem Ecol 45:869–878 (2019).
Saveer AM, Hatano E, Wada‐Katsumata A, Meagher RL and Schal C, Nonanal, a new fall armyworm sex pheromone component, significantly increases the efficacy of pheromone lures. Pest Manag Sci 79:2831–2839 (2023).
Malo EA, Castrejón‐Gómez VR, Cruz‐López L and Rojas JC, Antennal sensilla and electrophysiological response of male and female Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to conspecific sex pheromone and plant odors. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:1273–1284 (2004).
Rojas JC, Virgen A and Cruz‐López L, Chemical and tactile cues influencing oviposition of a generalist moth, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 32:1386–1392 (2003).
Glas JJ, Schimmel BCJ, Alba JM, Escobar‐Bravo R, Schuurink RC and Kant MR, Plant glandular trichomes as targets for breeding or engineering of resistance to herbivores. Int J Mol Sci 13:17077–17103 (2012).
Kariyat RR, Hardison SB, Ryan AB, Stephenson AG, De Moraes CM and Mescher MC, Leaf trichomes affect caterpillar feeding in an instar‐specific manner. Commun Integr Biol 11:1–6 (2018).
Butter NS and Singb S, Ovipositional response of Helicoverpa armigera to different cotton genotypes. Phytoparasitica 24:97–102 (1996).
Moraes RFO, Boiça Júnior AL, Eduardo WI and Ribeiro ZA, Oviposition behavior of Helicoverpa armigera in soybean. Arq Inst Biol (Sao Paulo) 87:e1252018 (2020).
Griese E, Pineda A, Pashalidou FG, Iradi EP, Hilker M, Dicke M et al., Plant responses to butterfly oviposition partly explain preference–performance relationships on different brassicaceous species. Oecologia 192:463–475 (2020).
de Oriani MAG and Vendramim JD, Influence of trichomes on attractiveness and ovipositional preference of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) B biotype (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on tomato genotypes. Neotrop Entomol 39:1002–1007 (2010).
Wagner GJ, Wang E and Shepherd RW, New approaches for studying and exploiting an old protuberance, the plant trichome. Ann Bot 93:3–11 (2004).
Rojas JC, Kolomiets MV and Bernal JS, Nonsensical choices? Fall armyworm moths choose seemingly best or worst hosts for their larvae, but neonate larvae make their own choices. PLoS One 13:1–29 (2018).
Nault BA, All JN and Boerma HR, Resistance in vegetative and reproductive stages of a soybean breeding line to three defoliating pests (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 85:1507–1515 (1992). - Contributed Indexing: Keywords: fall armyworm; mass gain; oviposition; pest biology; reproductive stage volatiles; trichomes
- Publication Date: Date Created: 20241222 Latest Revision: 20241222
- Publication Date: 20241223
- Accession Number: 10.1002/ps.8600
- Accession Number: 39710863
- Publication Information:
Contact CCPL
Copyright 2022 Charleston County Public Library Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [350.3] | Staff Login
No Comments.