Developing a Nursing Workload Intensity Staffing Model: Evaluating the Perceptions of Nurses and the Effect on Nursing-Sensitive Indicators.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1263116 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1539-0721 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00020443 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Nurs Adm Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      Original Publication: [Billerica, Mass., Contemporary Publishing Associates]
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To explore a workload intensity staffing (WIS) model's effect on nurse and patient outcomes.
      Background: Little is known about the relationship between WIS and nurse and patient outcomes.
      Methods: A point-based workload intensity tool was developed and implemented to determine the level of care for adult inpatients. Before and after implementation, nurses provided feedback on staffing practices. Rates for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), and patient fall rates were collected.
      Results: Nurses indicated that patients were equally distributed among nurses (pre-score mean [M] = 3.7 vs post M = 3.6, P = 0.609) and that patient work intensity was incorporated into patient assignments (pre M = 3.4 vs post M = 3.5, P = 0.717). A significant negative trend was revealed for patient falls per 1000 patient-days (b = -0.063, P = 0.010) with fewer falls post-WIS implementation and a significant decrease in falls with injury (b = -0.085, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in CAUTI and CLABSI rates for pre- versus post-WIS and WIS implementation.
      Conclusions: Although these initial results are promising, more research is needed on WIS and nurse and patient outcomes.
      Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
      (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
    • References:
      US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2022. Occupational Outlook Handbook: Registered Nurses. https://www.bls.gov. Accessed August 31, 2022.
      McHugh MD, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Windsor C, Douglass C, Yates P. Effects of nurse-to-patient ratio legislation on nurse staffing and patient mortality, readmissions, and length of stay: a prospective study in a panel of hospitals. Lancet. 2021;397(10288):1905–1913. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00768-6. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00768-6)
      American Nurses Association (ANA). August 31, 2022. Nurse staffing measures. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nurse-staffing/nurse-staffing-measures. Accessed February 13, 2024.
      Lasater KB, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, et al. Patient outcomes and cost savings associated with hospital safe nurse staffing legislation: an observational path. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e052899. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10/1136/bmjopen-2021-052899. (PMID: 10/1136/bmjopen-2021-052899)
      Lasater KB, Aiken LH, Sloane DM, et al. Chronic hospital nurse understaffing meets COVID-19: an observational study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021; 30:639–647. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011512. (PMID: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011512)
      McHugh MD, Rochman MF, Sloan DM, et al; And American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines—Resuscitation Investigators. Better nurse staffing and nurse work environments associated with increased survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Med Care. 2016;54(1):74–80. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000456. (PMID: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000456)
      Welton JM, Harper EM. Measuring nursing care value. Nurs Econ. 2016;34(1):7–14 quiz 15.
      Ellis WM, Dark T. Developing a tool to measure work intensity. Nurs Manage. 2020;51(2):10–12. doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000617036.73190.96. (PMID: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000617036.73190.96)
      Firestone-Howard B, Gonzalez JFZ, Dudjak LA, Ren D, Rader S. The effects of implementing a patient acuity tool on nurse satisfaction in a pulmonary medicine unit. Nurs Adm Q. 2017;41(4):E5–E14. doi:10.109//NAQ.0000000000000254. (PMID: 10.109//NAQ.0000000000000254)
      Acar I, Butt SE. Modeling nurse-patient assignments considering patient acuity and travel distance metrics. J Biomed Inform. 2016;64:192–206.
      American Nurses Association (ANA). ANA CAUTI Prevention Tool. November 30, 2022. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/work-environment/health-safety/infection-prevention/ana-cauti-prevention-tool/. Accessed February 13, 2024.
      Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Preventing falls in hospitals. December 1, 2022. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-prevention/toolkit/index.html. Accessed February 13, 2024.
      LeLaurin JH, Shorr RI. Preventing falls in hospitalized patients: state of the science. Clin Geriatr Med. 2019;35(2):273–283. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.007)
      Shang J, Needleman J, Liu J, Larson E, Stone PW. Nurse staffing and healthcare-associated infection, unit-level analysis. J Nurs Adm. 2019;49(5):260–265. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000748. (PMID: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000748)
      Cooke M, de la Fuente M, Stringfield C, et al. The impact of nurse staffing on falls performance within a health care system: a descriptive study. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(3):750–757. doi:10.1111/jonm.13555. (PMID: 10.1111/jonm.13555)
      He J, Staggs VS, Bergquist-Beringer S, Dunton N. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes: a longitudinal study on trend and seasonality. BMC Nurs. 2016;15(1):60. doi:10.1186/s12912-016-0181-3. (PMID: 10.1186/s12912-016-0181-3)
      Zhang F, Wagner AK, Ross-Degnan D. Simulation-based power calculation for designing interrupted time series analyses of health policy interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(11):1252–1261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.007. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.02.007)
      Koualty IA, Nassar N, Nizam M, Badr LK. Evidence on nurse staffing ratios and patient outcomes in a low-income country: implications for future research and practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018;15(5):353–360. doi:10.1111/wvn.12316. (PMID: 10.1111/wvn.12316)
      Penfold RB, Zhang F. Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(6 suppl):S38–S44. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002)
      Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002;27(4):299–309. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x)
      SAS Institute, Inc. SAS 9.4 Statements: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2013.
      Emmons KL. Exploring the Organizational Development Changes Needed by Healthcare Leaders to Increase Engagement by Nurse Managers [doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations Database. Colorado Springs, CO: Colorado Technical University; 2008.
      Welton JM, Unruh L, Halloran EJ. Nurse staffing, nursing intensity, staff mix, and direct nursing care costs across Massachusetts hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(9):416–425. doi:10.1097/00005110-200609000-00008. (PMID: 10.1097/00005110-200609000-00008)
      Fasolino T, Verdin T. Nursing surveillance and physiological signs of deterioration. Medsurg Nurs. 2015;24(6):397–402.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20241210 Date Completed: 20241210 Latest Revision: 20241210
    • Publication Date:
      20241210
    • Accession Number:
      10.1097/NNA.0000000000001490
    • Accession Number:
      39654461