Predicting poor functional outcomes for patients with large computed tomography perfusion core infarctions treated with endovascular thrombectomy.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: Stroke patients with large core infarctions benefit from endovascular intervention, though only approximately 20% are functionally independent at 90 days. We studied prognostic factors for patients presenting with a large computed tomography perfusion (CTP) core.
      Methods: Retrospective analysis from a health system stroke registry, including consecutive thrombectomy patients treated within 24 hours from August 2020-December 2022 with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and CTP core infarct ≥50 milliliters. Logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4-6. The prognostic ability of previously reported scales was also assessed.
      Results: In 118 included patients, with mean age 64.3 ± 14.1 years, poor functional outcomes were present in 66 subjects (55.9%). The multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that higher presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.23, p = 0.014), elevated glucose (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p = 0.002), absence of treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.35-11.95, p = 0.013), and poor revascularization (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.24-18.37, p = 0.023) were independently associated with primary outcome. The Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS) predicted 90-day mRS 4-6 (per 25-point increase, OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.34, p<0.001) and mRS 5-6 (per 25-point increase, OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.33, p<0.001). Nineteen of 20 (95%) patients with CLEOS ≥ 675 had 90-day mRS scores of 4-6, while 10 of 12 (83.3%) with CLEOS ≥ 725 had 90-day mRS scores of 5-6.
      Conclusion: We report prognostic factors that can risk stratify thrombectomy patients with large CTP core infarctions.
      Competing Interests: Dr. Rahul Karamchandani receives research support from Genentech. Dr. Joe Bernard declares stock/stock options from Viz.Ai and personal fees from Stryker, Terumo, and Rapid AI. Dr. Andrew Asimos is a consultant for Rapid AI. All other authors report no disclosures.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Karamchandani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Neurology. 2013 Jan 1;80(1):21-8. (PMID: 23175723)
      J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 May;31(5):106393. (PMID: 35276475)
      Neurology. 2009 Sep 29;73(13):1066-72. (PMID: 19786699)
      N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 7;386(14):1303-1313. (PMID: 35138767)
      J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Nov;7(11):783-8. (PMID: 25320054)
      Lancet Neurol. 2018 Oct;17(10):895-904. (PMID: 30264728)
      J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):350-355. (PMID: 31401563)
      N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 6;388(14):1259-1271. (PMID: 36762865)
      J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 May;15(5):413-414. (PMID: 36810356)
      AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Aug;31(7):1192-6. (PMID: 20223889)
      Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. (PMID: 31662037)
      N Engl J Med. 2019 May 9;380(19):1795-1803. (PMID: 31067369)
      Lancet. 2023 Nov 11;402(10414):1753-1763. (PMID: 37837989)
      J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1172-1179. (PMID: 32457220)
      Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):46-55. (PMID: 30413385)
      N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718. (PMID: 29364767)
      J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Aug;31(8):106548. (PMID: 35567936)
      N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 22;390(8):701-711. (PMID: 38329148)
      N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):611-622. (PMID: 29766770)
      N Engl J Med. 2023 Apr 6;388(14):1272-1283. (PMID: 36762852)
      N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21. (PMID: 29129157)
      Stroke. 1988 May;19(5):604-7. (PMID: 3363593)
      Can J Neurol Sci. 2018 May;45(3):339-342. (PMID: 29455683)
      Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3324-30. (PMID: 23929748)
      JAMA Neurol. 2019 Oct 01;76(10):1147-1156. (PMID: 31355873)
      Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. (PMID: 26898852)
      AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Mar;29(3):582-7. (PMID: 18337393)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20241118 Date Completed: 20241118 Latest Revision: 20241120
    • Publication Date:
      20241120
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11573161
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0309163
    • Accession Number:
      39556573