Physician-to-Physician eConsultations to Ophthalmologists at an Academic Medical Center.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101595919 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2164-2591 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21642591 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Transl Vis Sci Technol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Rockville, Md. : Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
    • Subject Terms:
      Academic Medical Centers* ; Ophthalmologists*; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Referral and Consultation ; Aged ; Eye Diseases/diagnosis ; Eye Diseases/therapy ; Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data ; Ophthalmology ; Massachusetts
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: Physician-to-physician electronic consultation (eConsults) are used across specialties; however, their effectiveness in ophthalmology has not been reported. This study evaluated the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a physician-to-physician ophthalmology eConsult program, assessed the timeliness of in-person evaluation, and characterized the clinical questions of non-ophthalmology providers.
      Methods: Retrospective review of patients for whom an ophthalmology eConsult was placed to Massachusetts Eye and Ear from February 2019-August 2021. The eConsults were reviewed to identify submission-to-response time, primary diagnoses by eConsultant, and referral outcomes. The eConsults were categorized based on clinical question, urgency, and ophthalmic condition addressed. Demographic data on patients and referring providers were collected.
      Results: One hundred ophthalmology eConsults were placed, and 100% were responded to by an ophthalmologist. An average of 1.6 ± 1.9 days elapsed from the time of eConsult to completion. Of the 30 patients who presented for in-person evaluation at an ophthalmology clinic, diagnostic concordance between eConsultant and in-person ophthalmologist was observed in 93% of cases (n = 28 of 30). An average of 28.9 ± 27.4 days from eConsult response to in-person follow-up was observed. The most common clinical inquiries were about appropriate triage/referral (24.4%), management (22%), and diagnosis (19.7%). All eConsults were non-urgent. The most common ophthalmic condition addressed was chalazia/hordeola (14%). Only 5% of patients presented to an emergency department for the same ophthalmic concern addressed by eConsult.
      Conclusions: Ophthalmology eConsults provide timely access to nonurgent ocular diagnosis, triage, and management and in our study seem to provide high rates of diagnostic accuracy for nonurgent ophthalmic conditions.
      Translational Relevance: Using ophthalmic eConsults can facilitate timely access to specialty care and reduce patient and provider burden.
    • References:
      JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 1;139(11):1174-1182. (PMID: 34554212)
      J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):471-479. (PMID: 31621847)
      Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):80-91. (PMID: 23968605)
      Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 Sep;37(5):804-810. (PMID: 32544276)
      BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Oct 15;4:54. (PMID: 33073171)
      J Neuroophthalmol. 2020 Sep;40(3):292-304. (PMID: 32604249)
      Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Aug 28;7:23337214211032055. (PMID: 34471649)
      Ophthalmology. 2017 May;124(5):720-729. (PMID: 28159379)
      BMJ Innov. 2021 Apr;7(2):271-277. (PMID: 34192016)
      Fam Med. 2019 Jul;51(7):567-573. (PMID: 31287902)
      Ophthalmology. 2016 Dec;123(12):2456-2461. (PMID: 27633646)
      Pediatr Dermatol. 2013 Sep-Oct;30(5):561-7. (PMID: 23889079)
      J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;12(4):449-450. (PMID: 29090062)
      Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;222:126-136. (PMID: 32882220)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3117-3119. (PMID: 32424786)
      Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;218:128-135. (PMID: 32445703)
      Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 01;14:4155-4163. (PMID: 33293788)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1427-1433. (PMID: 31197734)
      J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Sep;21(6):323-30. (PMID: 25995331)
      Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1145-1150. (PMID: 27732095)
      Telemed J E Health. 2020 Dec;26(12):1500-1506. (PMID: 32543326)
      Telemed J E Health. 2013 Oct;19(10):733-8. (PMID: 23980939)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):715-721. (PMID: 29532299)
      Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 15;2014:527831. (PMID: 27379302)
      BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010920. (PMID: 27338880)
      Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 10;20(1):58. (PMID: 33568126)
      Trials. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):348. (PMID: 31182123)
      Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):83-90. (PMID: 34027803)
      JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jul 10;7(3):e13354. (PMID: 31293239)
      JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;134(3):312-9. (PMID: 26821577)
      BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1):. (PMID: 32576560)
      J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211005303. (PMID: 33759622)
      J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Winter;38(1):41-48. (PMID: 29351133)
      J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Nov - Dec;7(8):2594-2602. (PMID: 31170540)
      JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Jan 14;3(1):e5. (PMID: 25589233)
      Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020910305. (PMID: 32349581)
      Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;5(4):361-7. (PMID: 17664503)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20241008 Date Completed: 20241008 Latest Revision: 20241011
    • Publication Date:
      20241011
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11463702
    • Accession Number:
      10.1167/tvst.13.10.13
    • Accession Number:
      39377754