First genetic evaluation of a wild population of Crocodylus intermedius: New insights for the recovery of a Critically Endangered species.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
      Endangered Species* ; Alligators and Crocodiles*/genetics ; Microsatellite Repeats*/genetics ; Genetic Variation* ; Conservation of Natural Resources*; Animals ; Colombia ; Genetics, Population
    • Abstract:
      During the second third of last century, the Orinoco Crocodile (Crocodylus intermedius) underwent a hunting process driven by the demand from the North American, European, and Japanese leather industry, resulting in a sharp decline of its populations. Currently, only two known remaining populations of this Critically Endangered species persist in the Colombian Orinoquía: in the Guayabero-Duda-Lozada and the Cravo Norte-Ele-Lipa River Systems. The latter has been the only population subject of study, including recent surveys and local conservation initiatives such as egg and hatchling ranching. Despite suggestions for population recovery based on the observed increase in clutches in the area, information regarding its genetic status has been pending assessment. This research aims to provide a genetic characterization of this remaining population and to evaluate the diversity recovered during a period of the egg ranching initiative. For this purpose, we utilized variable molecular markers, specifically 17 microsatellite loci, nuclear DNA. Despite revealing intermediate levels of genetic diversity, we identified an effective population size of 11.5-17, well below the minimum values proposed for short-term subsistence. While no evidence of inbreeding was found, it is acknowledged as a potential risk based on the population's history. Additionally, we detected a historical bottleneck possibly influenced by arid periods affecting the region since the Pleistocene. While the evaluated population presents a unique opportunity for C. intermedius conservation, it also exposes a high risk of entering the extinction vortex. The primary action to be taken is to support the egg and hatchling ranching program, which successfully recovered most of the genetic diversity present in the population.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Castillo-Rodríguez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6. (PMID: 21585727)
      BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Feb 02;10:33. (PMID: 20122269)
      PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0226505. (PMID: 31869351)
      Mol Ecol. 2012 Jul;21(14):3403-18. (PMID: 22646281)
      Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5627. (PMID: 33707622)
      Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):305-18. (PMID: 11298947)
      Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7. (PMID: 21565059)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166-70. (PMID: 8159720)
      PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150245. (PMID: 26982578)
      Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Sep;115(3):185-7. (PMID: 25873145)
      Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 15;30(8):1187-1189. (PMID: 24389659)
      Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370. (PMID: 28563791)
      Mol Ecol. 2015 Jul;24(13):3441-54. (PMID: 26042479)
      Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(10):2148-64. (PMID: 19389175)
      Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Mar;114(3):272-80. (PMID: 25335559)
      Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Oct;27(10):578-84. (PMID: 22868005)
      Evol Appl. 2010 May;3(3):244-62. (PMID: 25567922)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1):. (PMID: 34930821)
      Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 20;8(1):1071. (PMID: 29057865)
      Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1413-9. (PMID: 7498780)
      Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):465-75. (PMID: 21486369)
      Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):2001-14. (PMID: 8978083)
      Science. 2014 Dec 12;346(6215):1254449. (PMID: 25504731)
      Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jan;14(1):209-14. (PMID: 23992227)
      PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172439. (PMID: 28234956)
      Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):551-5. (PMID: 21565056)
      BMC Biol. 2008 Nov 05;6:46. (PMID: 18986515)
      Anim Genet. 2014 Jun;45(3):456-9. (PMID: 24617992)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20241003 Date Completed: 20241003 Latest Revision: 20241005
    • Publication Date:
      20241005
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11449319
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0311412
    • Accession Number:
      39361668