Abstract: Background: For the initial treatment strategy for patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indications, whether to choose left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) or biventricular pacing (BVP) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of LBBaP and BVP in heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).
Methods: This observational study included HF patients with LBBB who underwent successful LBBaP or BVP. The primary outcomes were echocardiographic response (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] increase ≥5%), LVEF improvement, hospitalization costs, and CER (CER = cost/echocardiographic response rate). Secondary outcomes included other echocardiographic parameters, New York Heart Association (NYHA), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), pacemaker parameters, complications, ventricular arrhythmia (VA) events, HF hospitalization (HFH), and all-cause mortality.
Results: A total of 130 patients (85 LBBaP and 45 BVP) were included (65.6 ± 10.0 years, 70.77% men). The median follow-up period was 16(12,30), months. Compared with BVP, the LBBaP group showed a greater increase in LVEF (20.2% ± 11.8% vs. 10.5% ± 13.9%; p < 0.001), higher echocardiographic response rate (86.1% vs. 57.8%; p < 0.001), and lower hospitalization costs [$9707.7 (7751.2, 18,088.5) vs. $20,046.1 (18,840.1, 22,447.3); p < 0.0001]. The CER was 112.7 and 346.8 in LBBaP and BVP, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER = △cost/△echocardiographic response rate) was $-365.3/per 1% increase in effectiveness. LBBaP improved cardiac function more significantly than BVP. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: LBBaP-CRT is more cost-effective than BVP, offering greater LVEF improvement, higher echocardiographic response rates, lower hospitalization costs, and more significantly improved cardiac function. These findings need large randomized clinical trials for further confirmation.
(© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: C. Daubert, N. Behar, R. P. Martins, P. Mabo, and C. Leclercq, “Avoiding Non‐responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Practical Guide,” European Heart Journal 38, no. 19 (2017): 1463–1472.
Y. Wang, H. Zhu, X. Hou, et al., “Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 80, no. 13 (2022): 1205–1216.
W. Huang, L. Su, S. Wu, et al., “A Novel Pacing Strategy With Low and Stable Output: Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Immediately Beyond the Conduction Block,” The Canadian Journal of Cardiology 33, no. 12 (2017): 1736.e1–1736.e3.
W. Zhang, J. Huang, Y. Qi, et al., “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block,” Heart Rhythm 16, no. 12 (2019): 1783–1790.
P. Vijayaraman, P. S. Sharma, Ó. Cano, et al., “Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing in Candidates for Resynchronization Therapy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 82, no. 3 (2023): 228–241.
J. C. Diaz, W. H. Sauer, M. Duque, et al., “Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Biventricular Pacing as Initial Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization,” JACC Clinical Electrophysiology (2023): 1568–1581.
W. Huang, X. Chen, L. Su, S. Wu, X. Xia, and P. Vijayaraman, “A Beginner's Guide to Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing,” Heart Rhythm 16, no. 12 (2019): 1791–1796.
K. Chen and Y. Li, “How to Implant Left Bundle Branch Pacing Lead in Routine Clinical Practice,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 30, no. 11 (2019): 2569–2577.
W. Huang, S. Wu, P. Vijayaraman, et al., “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing,” JACC Clinical Electrophysiology 6, no. 7 (2020): 849–858.
P. Vijayaraman, S. Ponnusamy, Ó. Cano, et al., “Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group,” JACC Clinical Electrophysiology 7, no. 2 (2021): 135–147.
X. Chen, Y. Ye, Z. Wang, et al., “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy via Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs. Optimized Biventricular Pacing With Adaptive Algorithm in Heart Failure With Left Bundle Branch Block: A Prospective, Multi‐centre, Observational Study,” Europace: European Pacing, Arrhythmias, and Cardiac Electrophysiology 24, no. 5 (2022): 807–816.
Y. Wang, K. Gu, Z. Qian, et al., “The Efficacy of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared With Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure: A Matched Case‐Control Study,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 31, no. 8 (2020): 2068–2077.
A. Naik, B. Singh, R. Yadav, et al., “Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Associated With Improvement in Clinical Outcomes in Indian Heart Failure Patients: Results of a Large, Long‐Term Observational Study,” Indian Heart Journal 70, no. 3 (2018): S377–S383.
Q. J. Shan, H. Xu, X. J. Zhou, et al., “Effects of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing on QRS Duration and Short‐Term Cardiac Function in Pacing‐Indicated Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block,” Chinese Medical Journal 134, no. 9 (2021): 1101–1103.
X. Li, C. Qiu, R. Xie, et al., “Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Delivery of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing,” ESC Heart Failure 7, no. 4 (2020): 1711–1722.
S. S. Ponnusamy, V. Ganesan, V. Ramalingam, et al., “MAgnetic Resonance Imaging Based DUal Lead Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Prospective Left Bundle Branch Pacing Study (MADURAI LBBP Study),” Heart Rhythm 20, no. 8 (2023): 1119–1127.
S. Wu, L. Su, P. Vijayaraman, et al., “Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Nonrandomized on‐Treatment Comparison With His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing,” The Canadian Journal of Cardiology 37, no. 2 (2021): 319–328.
F. M. Ezzeddine, S. M. Pistiolis, M. Pujol‐Lopez, et al., “Outcomes of Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure: A Multicenter Experience,” Heart Rhythm 20, no. 6 (2023): 863–871.
No Comments.