Parametric and nonparametric population pharmacokinetic analysis of fluconazole in critically ill patients and dosing simulations for Candida infections.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Society for Microbiology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0315061 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1098-6596 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00664804 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Washington, American Society for Microbiology
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of fluconazole has been reported in critically ill patients, but the implications for fluconazole dosing remain unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the population PK of fluconazole and identify appropriate dosage regimens by simulations. This was a retrospective analysis of fluconazole PK data from patients hospitalized in critical care and infectious disease departments. Both parametric and nonparametric population approaches were used. Various loading and maintenance fluconazole doses were evaluated by simulations, with computation of the probabilities of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fractions of response (CFR) based on international and local minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of Candida sp. Data from 36 critically ill patients and 16 non-critically ill patients were available for model building ( n = 202 concentrations). The final model adequately described the data, including the external data set (13 patients). After 24 h of therapy, 65% and 74% of patients had trough and area under the concentration-time curve values below the usual targets. Standard dosages were associated with low PTA for MIC >1 mg/L at 24 h. Higher loading doses administered two times daily improved PTA. CFR were >90% for C. albicans with standard dosages, while they were very low for C. glabrata , even with high dosages. Candida species and associated MIC distributions strongly influence fluconazole dosage requirements. Higher loading doses may be necessary for the achievement of PK/PD targets up to MIC breakpoints. The use of fluconazole for invasive C. glabrata infection should be discouraged because of poor PK/PD target attainment.
      Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
    • References:
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Aug;49(8):3171-7. (PMID: 16048920)
      Rev Med Interne. 2020 Feb;41(2):98-105. (PMID: 31898997)
      Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 1;48(5):503-35. (PMID: 19191635)
      Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 30;9(10):. (PMID: 34683388)
      Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22(8):733.e1-8. (PMID: 27189197)
      Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1303-12. (PMID: 25097069)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Sep;43(9):2116-20. (PMID: 10471550)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Sep 21;64(10):. (PMID: 32816723)
      J Infect. 2017 Jul;75(1):59-67. (PMID: 28366686)
      J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;62(2):158-170. (PMID: 34713491)
      Mycoses. 2011 Jan;54(1):46-51. (PMID: 19627509)
      Crit Care. 2019 Jun 14;23(1):219. (PMID: 31200780)
      J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 May;69(5):1162-76. (PMID: 24379304)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Feb 17;65(3):. (PMID: 33361309)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Feb;57(2):1006-11. (PMID: 23254425)
      Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993 Jan;24(1):10-27. (PMID: 8448970)
      Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Aug;34(4):467-76. (PMID: 22722776)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6550-6557. (PMID: 27550344)
      Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;24(5):643-7. (PMID: 6873144)
      Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Mar-Apr;12 Suppl 3:S318-26. (PMID: 2184510)
      J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;62(2):142-157. (PMID: 33103785)
      J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Jun;37(3):356-63. (PMID: 21883330)
      Crit Care. 2015 Feb 04;19:33. (PMID: 25888060)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1105-9. (PMID: 9593135)
      Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1127-1153. (PMID: 32383061)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Oct;51(10):3599-604. (PMID: 17646421)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jan;51(1):35-9. (PMID: 17101684)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Sep;52(9):3022-8. (PMID: 18591269)
      Pharmacotherapy. 2003 May;23(5):592-602. (PMID: 12741433)
      J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011 Feb;38(1):41-61. (PMID: 21088872)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Apr;47(4):1179-86. (PMID: 12654644)
      Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Dec;57(10):723-7. (PMID: 11829202)
      Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 15;62(4):e1-50. (PMID: 26679628)
      Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;40(7):1521-1528. (PMID: 33638727)
      Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):789-805. (PMID: 30911804)
      Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1739-46. (PMID: 22423135)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Dec;55(12):5868-73. (PMID: 21930888)
      Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Feb 17;65(3):. (PMID: 33361296)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: antifungal; critical care; fluconazole; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring
    • Accession Number:
      8VZV102JFY (Fluconazole)
      0 (Antifungal Agents)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240926 Date Completed: 20241106 Latest Revision: 20241108
    • Publication Date:
      20241108
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11539208
    • Accession Number:
      10.1128/aac.00991-24
    • Accession Number:
      39324800