Motor improvement and spasms recovery with high-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation in a patient with spastic tetraparesis: beyond pain relief.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Gazzeri R;Gazzeri R; Galarza M; Galarza M; Occhigrossi F; Occhigrossi F
  • Source:
    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society [Eur Spine J] 2024 Dec; Vol. 33 (12), pp. 4750-4756. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 26.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Case Reports
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9301980 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-0932 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09406719 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur Spine J Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany : Springer-Verlag, c1992-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: To describe the clinical outcomes beyond pain relief of high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz (10 kHz SCS) in a patient with cervical myelopathy and drug-resistant chronic neuropathic pain with spastic tetraparesis.
      Methods: A patient with C3-C6 myelomalacia and spastic tetraparesis previously treated with decompressive laminectomy underwent implantation of 10 kHz SCS for pain management through a trial procedure followed by permanent implantation. Due to the presence of epidural fibrotic scar tissue in the area of the previous C3-C6 laminectomy, the leads could not be implanted at the cervical level; therefore, the leads were positioned at the thoracic level. Data were collected during routine follow-up visits up to 15 months after implantation.
      Results: Since the trialing phase and during all follow-up visits, along with complete pain relief in the lower limbs, a recovery from spasms was observed with an improvement in motor function. The patient recovered from a sensation of stiffness and difficulty in movement, with a significant decrease in muscle tone, regaining confidence in walking, and no longer needing assistance even for long walking distances. Although all disabling and painful symptomatology in the upper limbs instead did not ameliorate, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score decreased from 50% at baseline to 6%.
      Conclusion: To our knowledge, recovery from spasms and motor improvement in a spastic tetraparesis patient has never been reported before with 10 kHz SCS and possibly this new stimulation paradigm may overcome some performance limitations of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Treatment eliminated spasms at the lower limbs but not at the upper ones, thus suggesting that the location of the epidural leads could affect outcomes.
      Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Conflict of interest: None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest. Consent to participate: The procedures performed including 10 kHz SCS trial and implantation of the IPG was part of the usual treatment plan for patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain and was not part of a prospective study requiring Institutional Review Board approval. Consent to publish: The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Lebl DR, Hughes A, Cammisa FP, O’Leary PF (2011) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSS J 7:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-011-9208-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s11420-011-9208-1227544193145857)
      De Carolis G, Paroli M, Tollapi L, Doust M, Burgher AH, Yu C et al (2017) Paresthesia-Independence: an Assessment of technical factors related to 10 kHz paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation. Pain Physician 20:331–341. (PMID: 28535555)
      Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT et al (2015) Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is Superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: the SENZA-RCT Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology 123:851–860. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000774. (PMID: 10.1097/ALN.000000000000077426218762)
      Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT et al (2016) Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month results from a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial. Neurosurgery 79:667–677. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418. (PMID: 10.1227/NEU.000000000000141827584814)
      Amirdelfan K, Vallejo R, Benyamin R, Yu C, Yang T, Bundschu R et al (2020) High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of Combined Neck and Arm Pain: results from a prospective Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 87:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz495. (PMID: 10.1093/neuros/nyz49531792530)
      Deer TR, Grider JS, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski S, Hunter CW et al (2020) A systematic literature review of spine neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of Pain. Pain Med 21:1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz353. (PMID: 10.1093/pm/pnz35332034422)
      Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M (2015) Treatment-limiting complications of Percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implants: a review of eight years of experience from an academic Center Database. Neuromodulation 18:603–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12312. (PMID: 10.1111/ner.1231226053499)
      Nagel SJ, Wilson S, Johnson MD, Machado A, Frizon L, Chardon MK et al (2017) Spinal cord stimulation for spasticity: historical approaches, current status, and future directions. Neuromodulation: Technol Neural Interface 20:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12591. (PMID: 10.1111/ner.12591)
      Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T (2014) Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back Pain: 24-Month results of a prospective Multicenter Study. Pain Med 15:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12294. (PMID: 10.1111/pme.1229424308759)
      Stauss T, El Majdoub F, Sayed D, Surges G, Rosenberg WS, Kapural L et al (2019) A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 6:496–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.720. (PMID: 10.1002/acn3.720309115736414485)
      Amirdelfan K, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Morgan DM, Kapural L et al (2018) Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT. Qual Life Res 27:2035–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-829858746)
      Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN (2018) Spinal cord stimulation: clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract 18:1048–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12692. (PMID: 10.1111/papr.12692295260436391880)
      Chakravarthy K, Richter H, Christo PJ, Williams K, Guan Y (2018) Spinal cord stimulation for treating Chronic Pain: reviewing preclinical and clinical data on paresthesia-free high frequency therapy. Neuromodulation 21:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12721. (PMID: 10.1111/ner.1272129105244)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Cervical myelopathy; Drug-resistant pain; High-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation; Spastic tetraparesis; Spasticity
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240925 Date Completed: 20241125 Latest Revision: 20241125
    • Publication Date:
      20241126
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s00586-024-08505-1
    • Accession Number:
      39322776