An exploration of the emotional response among nurses in Bermuda, during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

COVID-19*/psychology ; COVID-19*/epidemiology ; Emotions* ; Nurses*/psychology ; Pandemics*; Humans ; Bermuda/epidemiology ; Qualitative Research ; Workload/psychology

Objectives: This paper utilizes an ontological approach to conduct a qualitative literature review in order to investigate the emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on nurses internationally. After identifying common themes in the literature review, primary research is conducted to investigate the emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on nurses working in Bermuda´s only acute healthcare facility.
Methods: The literature review used the FRAMEWORK approach (Richie and Spencer, 1994, as cited in Hackett et al. (2018) to select a total of 16 papers for review, each of them qualitative primary research, aside from one paper reviewing international literature. Within the second part of this paper, investigating the experience of nurses in Bermuda, a grounded theory approach was utilised to collect primary data. Convenience sampling was used to recruit subjects to participate in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Data saturation was achieved after 9 interviews. The FRAMEWORK method was utilised to analyse the interview transcripts, and identify, organise and collate themes.
Results: The literature review highlights that nurses have strong emotional responses to caring for patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. Specific responses include: higher stress levels at work due to higher, more challenging workload, and a reliance on clinical leaders to assuage this stress. Stigma experienced outside of work lead to feelings of anxiety and isolation. Despite this, there was a common theme that nurses felt a satisfaction within their role to ´play their part´ in the pandemic. The primary research conducted in Bermuda demonstrates that there was an initial fear of Covid-19, receding as the pandemic developed. Much anxiety was due to a perceived lack of knowledge about the disease, lack of a coherent strategy, and inadequate equipment to protect staff, and properly care for patients. An increased level of cooperation amongst staff, and mutual support amongst nurses was noted, as was social stigma leading to feelings of isolation and anxiety. Social interactions and holistic activities were identified as primary resources to alleviate stress and uncertainty.
Conclusions: Nurses in Bermuda elicited many of the same emotional responses as their international colleagues, as a result of caring for patients during the pandemic. These manifested as a result of higher, more challenging workload, and uncertainty about preparedness plan and quickly changing situations within the working environment. The results from this study can help formulate changes in policy to ensure smoother transitions to pandemic preparedness in the future.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exists.
(Copyright: © 2024 Moore, Leena. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

J Trauma Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;24(2):110-115. (PMID: 28272184)
Couns Psychother Res. 2020 Sep;20(3):389-393. (PMID: 32837328)
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11):766-767. (PMID: 32176257)
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):e60-e65. (PMID: 32283221)
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83. (PMID: 7899572)
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Mar;29(2):258-267. (PMID: 32881134)
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Mar;34(2):142-145. (PMID: 33358273)
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036469. (PMID: 33538823)
J Perianesth Nurs. 2020 Aug;35(4):439-440. (PMID: 32741522)
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Aug;29(15-16):2742-2750. (PMID: 32320509)
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Sep;37(5):757-763. (PMID: 32677072)
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Sep;28(6):1381-1390. (PMID: 32657465)
Int J Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr 04;7(2):157-160. (PMID: 32292633)
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237303. (PMID: 32764825)
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;41(6):525-530. (PMID: 32497451)
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4217-4226. (PMID: 32786150)
Nurse Res. 2019 Sep 21;26(2):8-13. (PMID: 30215482)
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;36(4):253-263. (PMID: 28570380)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 03;17(21):. (PMID: 33153198)
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):197. (PMID: 31238907)
Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Jul;38(2):. (PMID: 33047546)
Aust Crit Care. 2021 Mar;34(2):146-154. (PMID: 33632606)
Nurs Open. 2020 Sep 11;8(1):171-179. (PMID: 33318825)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103725. (PMID: 32810720)
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Oct;28(7):1704-1712. (PMID: 32767852)
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2020 Oct;34(5):427-433. (PMID: 33032769)
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):. (PMID: 33277297)
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 May;36(COVID19-S4):S6-S11. (PMID: 32582306)
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Jun;28(2):e1766. (PMID: 30687986)
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4270-4280. (PMID: 32810919)
PeerJ. 2020 Aug 19;8:e9725. (PMID: 32879801)
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 May 31;9(5):2180-2182. (PMID: 32754469)
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Jun;1(2):e61. (PMID: 32835330)
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Apr;123:9-20. (PMID: 32007680)
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:559-565. (PMID: 32330593)
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Nov;111:103637. (PMID: 32919358)

Date Created: 20240917 Date Completed: 20240917 Latest Revision: 20241007

20241008

PMC11407671

10.1371/journal.pone.0279792

39288110