- Source:
Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100967799 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2393 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712393 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Background: Findings from research and recommendations from the World Health Organization favor restrictive use of episiotomy, but whether this guidance is being followed in India, and factors associated with its use, are not known. This study sought to document trends in use of episiotomy over a five-year period (2014-2018); to examine its relationship to maternal, pregnancy, and health-system characteristics; and to investigate its association with other obstetric interventions.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected by the Maternal Newborn Health Registry, a prospective population-based pregnancy registry established in Central India (Nagpur, Eastern Maharashtra). We examined type of birth and use of episiotomy in vaginal deliveries from 2014 to 2018, as well as maternal and birth characteristics, health systems factors, and concurrent obstetric interventions associations with its use with multivariable Poisson regression models.
Results: During the five-year interval, the rate of episiotomy in vaginal birth rose from 13 to 31% despite a decline in assisted vaginal birth. Associations with episiotomy were found for the following factors: prior birth, multiple gestations, seven or more years of maternal education, higher gestational age, higher birthweight, delivery by an obstetrician (as compared to midwife or general physician), and birth in hospital (as compared to clinic or health center). After adjusting for these factors, year over year rise in episiotomy was significant with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (AIRR) of 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.12; p = 0.002]. We found an association between episiotomy and several other obstetric interventions, with the strongest relationship for maternal treatment with antibiotics (AIRR 4.23, 95% CI 3.12-5.73; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: Episiotomy in this population-based sample from central India steadily rose from 2014 to 2018. This increase over time was observed even after adjusting for patient characteristics, obstetric risk factors, and health system features, such as specialty of the birthing provider. Our findings have important implications for maternal-child health and respectful maternity care given that most women prefer to avoid episiotomy; they also highlight a potential target for antibiotic stewardship as part of global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance.
Trial Registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under reference number NCT01073475.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
- References:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 08;2:CD000081. (PMID: 28176333)
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S9. (PMID: 26063492)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 23;15:306. (PMID: 26596353)
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1734-1741. (PMID: 31003947)
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Feb;30(3):251-256. (PMID: 27018243)
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):131. (PMID: 27724946)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9:CD005528. (PMID: 30264405)
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322-38. (PMID: 6346168)
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;5(6):229-41. (PMID: 25436105)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;125(1):6-14. (PMID: 24529800)
Reprod Health. 2014 Sep 19;11(1):71. (PMID: 25238684)
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Jan;43(1):41-48. (PMID: 28334585)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Nov;91(2):157-9. (PMID: 16169552)
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2326-32. (PMID: 23478961)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;299(2):317-325. (PMID: 30564925)
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):233-9. (PMID: 22227639)
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):37-47. (PMID: 25712278)
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;36(7):730-736. (PMID: 30372772)
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. (PMID: 30322586)
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. (PMID: 35065702)
BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):945-6. (PMID: 11964339)
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):79-84. (PMID: 29889761)
Reprod Health. 2015 Dec 23;12:118. (PMID: 26700474)
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):214-8. (PMID: 10908765)
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Dec;19:313-316. (PMID: 31176071)
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):. (PMID: 34130991)
Birth. 1997 Jun;24(2):121-3. (PMID: 9271979)
Reprod Health. 2007 Oct 29;4:10. (PMID: 17967168)
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Oct 05;73(suppl 4):e20190899. (PMID: 33027489)
Reprod Health. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):55. (PMID: 28438209)
Indian J Med Res. 2016 Apr;143(4):474-80. (PMID: 27377504)
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1347-54. (PMID: 25894903)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Apr;96(4):410-420. (PMID: 28107771)
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. (PMID: 17999693)
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):606-607. (PMID: 35065701)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):573.e1-7. (PMID: 19243733)
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e024654. (PMID: 31383691)
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 May 19;2020:1582653. (PMID: 32934656)
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):e87-e102. (PMID: 30134424)
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100370. (PMID: 33831590)
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1308-1315. (PMID: 28604925)
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):219-23. (PMID: 16128977)
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251331. (PMID: 33989355)
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S1. (PMID: 26063166)
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 2;18(1):142. (PMID: 34215256)
- Grant Information:
U01 HD058322 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; U10 HD078439 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; UG1 HD078439 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS; U01HD058322, U01HD078439 United States NH NIH HHS
- Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Birth complications; Episiotomy; India; Vaginal birth
Local Abstract: [plain-language-summary] Episiotomy is a surgical procedure to widen the vaginal opening for childbirth. It was once commonly used worldwide. However, because the procedure can cause pain to mothers and place them at risk for infections and serious tears to the vagina—especially when the cut is directly downward—research suggests it should be used sparingly. As such, it is now less often practiced in high-income countries, but whether the same is true in India is not known. To answer this question, we used a large population-based pregnancy registry, the Maternal Newborn Health Registry, from Central India (Nagpur) to assess the frequency of episiotomy use between 2014 and 2018 and if there were certain maternal characteristics, features of the health care system, and other pregnancy interventions that were related with its use. Over this five-year period, the use of episiotomy during vaginal birth rose more than two-fold. It was more often used on women who had never delivered a baby before, were further along in pregnancy, had higher levels of education, had heavier babies, or were carrying more than one baby. Obstetricians were more likely to perform episiotomy than midwives or general physicians and it was more likely to be performed in hospitals than in clinics or primary health centers. This rise during the five-year interval was significant even when accounting for these patient and provider characteristics, suggesting a shift in medical practice. Because this was an observational study more research is needed to determine if the associations we found are causal.
- Molecular Sequence:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01073475
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20240912 Date Completed: 20240913 Latest Revision: 20240915
- Publication Date:
20240915
- Accession Number:
PMC11396254
- Accession Number:
10.1186/s12884-024-06762-y
- Accession Number:
39267006
Processing Request
No Comments.