Can we really distinguish 'responders' from 'non-responders' to myopia control interventions?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Brennan NA;Brennan NA; Nixon AD; Nixon AD; Cheng X; Cheng X; Bullimore MA; Bullimore MA
  • Source:
    Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) [Ophthalmic Physiol Opt] 2024 Nov; Vol. 44 (7), pp. 1363-1367. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 04.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8208839 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1475-1313 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02755408 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2002- : Oxford : Blackwell Publishers
      Original Publication: Oxford ; New York : Pergamon Press, c1981-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: It is common to hear talk of 'responders' and 'non-responders' with respect to myopia control interventions. We consider the reality of distinguishing these sub-groups using data from the first year of the Low-concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study.
      Methods: The first year of the LAMP study was a robustly designed, placebo-controlled trial of three different low concentrations of atropine using a large sample size (N > 100 randomised to each group). The authors subsequently published mean axial elongation and myopia progression rates by age group. We used these data to calculate efficacy in terms of both absolute reduction in myopic progression and absolute reduction in axial elongation for each of the different atropine concentrations at each age group. We then compared these efficacy data to the overall progression for each of the two progression metrics.
      Results: Plotting efficacy as a function of overall myopia progression and axial elongation for each of the different atropine concentrations demonstrates the invariant nature of efficacy, in terms of clinically meaningful reduction in progression, despite a substantial range of underlying overall progression. That is, faster progressors-the so-called non-responders-achieved similar reduction in axial elongation and myopia progression as the slower progressors-the so-called responders-within the various atropine treatment groups.
      Conclusion: The use of the terms, responders and non-responders, during myopia progression interventions is not supported by evidence. Those designated as such may simply be slower or faster progressors, who, on average achieve the same benefit from treatment.
      (© 2024 College of Optometrists.)
    • References:
      Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1036–1042.
      Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW. The complications of myopia: a review and meta‐analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:ARVO E‐Abstract 49.
      Bullimore MA, Ritchey ER, Shah S, Leveziel N, Bourne RRA, Flitcroft DI. The risks and benefits of myopia control. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1561–1579.
      Tideman JW, Snabel MC, Tedja MS, van Rijn GA, Wong KT, Kuijpers RWAM, et al. Association of axial length with risk of uncorrectable visual impairment for Europeans with myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:1355–1363.
      Bullimore MA, Brennan NA. The underestimated role of myopia in uncorrectable visual impairment in the United States. Sci Rep. 2023;13:15283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598‐023‐42108‐y.
      Xu L, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Cui T, Li J, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing: the Beijing eye study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:e1–e11.
      Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1354–1362.
      Hsu WM, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Tsai SY, Chou P. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai eye study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:62–69.
      Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:622–660.
      Yam JC, Zhang XJ, Zhang Y, Yip BHK, Tang F, Wong ES, et al. Effect of low‐concentration atropine eyedrops vs. placebo on myopia incidence in children: the LAMP2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;329:472–481.
      Jawaid I, Saunders K, Hammond CJ, Dahlmann‐Noor A, Bullimore MA. Low concentration atropine and myopia: a narrative review of the evidence for United Kingdom based practitioners. Eye (Lond). 2024;38:434–441.
      Logan NS, Bullimore MA. Optical interventions for myopia control. Eye (Lond). 2024;38:455–463.
      Li FF, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Yip BHK, Tang SM, Kam KW, et al. Age effect on treatment responses to 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine: low‐concentration atropine for myopia progression study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1180–1187.
      Chamberlain P, Bradley A, Arumugam B, Hammond D, McNally J, Logan NS, et al. Long‐term effect of dual‐focus contact lenses on myopia progression in children: a 6‐year multicenter clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2022;99:204–212.
      Prieto‐Garrido FL, Hernandez Verdejo JL, Villa‐Collar C, Ruiz‐Pomeda A. Predicting factors for progression of the myopia in the MiSight assessment study Spain (MASS). J Optom. 2022;15:78–87.
      Weng R, Lan W, Bakaraju R, Conrad F, Naduvilath T, Yang ZK, et al. Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: insights from a randomised, contralateral study design. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022;42:1253–1263.
      Usmani E, Callisto S, Chan WO, Taranath D. Real‐world outcomes of low‐dose atropine therapy on myopia progression in an Australian cohort during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;51:775–780.
      Guggenheim JA, Walline JJ. Identifying non‐responders to treatments for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023;43:945–946.
      Mutti DO, Sinnott LT, Brennan NA, Cheng X, Zadnik K, Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group. The limited value of prior change in predicting future progression of juvenile‐onset myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2022;99:424–433.
      Matsumura S, Lanca C, Htoon HM, Brennan N, Tan CS, Kathrani B, et al. Annual myopia progression and subsequent 2‐year myopia progression in Singaporean children. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:12. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.13.12.
      Brennan NA, Toubouti YM, Cheng X, Bullimore MA. Efficacy in myopia control. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;83:100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100923.
      Yam JC, Jiang Y, Tang SM, Law AKP, Chan JJ, Wong E, et al. Low‐concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study: a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled trial of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine eye drops in myopia control. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:113–124.
      Bullimore MA, Brennan NA. Efficacy in myopia control: the low‐concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study. Ophthalmology. 2023;130:771–772.
      Brennan NA, Shamp W, Maynes E, Cheng X, Bullimore MA. Influence of age and race on axial elongation in myopic children: a systematic review and meta‐regression. Optom Vis Sci. 2024;101:496–506.
      Wang Y. Re: Li et al.: Age effect on treatment responses to 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine: low‐concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study (ophthalmology. 2021;128:1180–1187). Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e70–e72.
      Cheng X, Xu J, Brennan NA. Accommodation and its role in myopia progression and control with soft contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39:162–171.
      Richdale K, Skidmore KV, Tomiyama ES, Bullimore MA. Compounded 0.01% atropine‐what's in the bottle? Eye Contact Lens. 2023;49:219–223.
      Bullimore MA, Jong M, Brennan NA. Myopia control: seeing beyond efficacy. Optom Vis Sci. 2024;101:134–142.
      Troilo D, Smith EL III, Nickla DL, Ashby R, Tkatchenko AV, Ostrin LA, et al. IMI—report on experimental models of emmetropization and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:M31–M88.
      Hung LF, Arumugam B, She Z, Ostrin L, Smith EL III. Narrow‐band, long‐wavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards vision‐induced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys. Exp Eye Res. 2018;176:147–160.
      Phillips JR. Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1196–1200.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: axial length; children; myopia; myopia control; myopia progression
    • Accession Number:
      7C0697DR9I (Atropine)
      0 (Mydriatics)
      0 (Ophthalmic Solutions)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240904 Date Completed: 20241030 Latest Revision: 20241105
    • Publication Date:
      20241106
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/opo.13379
    • Accession Number:
      39229644