Application and evaluation of minimally invasive surgical treatment options for early endometrial cancer.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Xu L;Xu L; Hua F; Hua F; Li C; Li C; Xu T; Xu T
  • Source:
    Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine [Technol Health Care] 2024; Vol. 32 (6), pp. 4403-4415.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: IOS Press Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9314590 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-7401 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09287329 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Technol Health Care Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Amsterdam : IOS Press
      Original Publication: Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier, c1993-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques have gained popularity, and endometrial cancer (EC) remains a significant health problem among women.
      Objective: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) therapy options for early endometrial cancer will be evaluated for their effectiveness and safety is the aim of this paper. We also investigate the differences in oncologic outcomes between MIS and open surgery (OS) for individuals with early-stage EC. The patient was diagnosed with early-stage EC and treated with laparoscopic surgery and was the focus of a retrospective analysis. 162 patients with early EC were analyzed, with diagnoses occurring between 2002 and 2022.
      Methods: The patients were fragmented into two groups, one for OS and another for laparoscopic procedures. The total tumor excision and recurrence rates were identical across the two methods, indicating similar oncologic results. Rates of complications were likewise comparable across the two groups.
      Results: The quality of life ratings of patients with robotic-assisted surgery was higher than those with laparoscopic surgery. Sixty-two (62.2%) of the 162 patients in this research had OS, whereas Fifty-six (57.8%) had MIS. The probability of recurrence of EC from stages III to IV was significanitly higher in women who had OS.
      Conclusion: Minimally invasive procedures were shown to be effective in treating early-stage EC, and while these findings provide support for their usage, larger multicenter randomized controlled studies are required to verify these results and further examine possible long-term advantages. Patients with early-stage EC, regardless of histologic type, had superior survival rates with MIS compared to OS.
    • References:
      Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;44(12):1117-1121. (PMID: 36580938)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 1;138(6):828-837. (PMID: 34735382)
      Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 30;53(9):791-797. (PMID: 37366149)
      Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1608-1616. (PMID: 38291161)
      J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May - Jun;27(4):816-825. (PMID: 31715304)
      BMJ. 2022 Nov 14;379:e070750. (PMID: 36375827)
      Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 29;12(12):. (PMID: 33260382)
      Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):625-632. (PMID: 33158510)
      Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):83-90. (PMID: 33160695)
      Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jul;63(4):417-431. (PMID: 32689770)
      Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):732-736. (PMID: 33004215)
      Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):549-557. (PMID: 33091967)
      J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):. (PMID: 33396373)
      Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 May;31(5):647-655. (PMID: 33664126)
      JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):157-164. (PMID: 33175109)
      Eur J Cancer. 2024 Feb;198:113500. (PMID: 38199146)
      Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;11:720894. (PMID: 34568050)
      Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 15;29(18):3681-3690. (PMID: 37439797)
      Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020 Aug;29(4):232-239. (PMID: 31169418)
      Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Feb;301(2):585-590. (PMID: 31781888)
      Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:256-261. (PMID: 34837855)
      Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):65.e1-65.e11. (PMID: 32693096)
      Int J Surg. 2024 May 01;110(5):3072-3080. (PMID: 38445439)
      Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 16;14(18):. (PMID: 36139659)
      Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;158(3):681-688. (PMID: 32571681)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Early stage; adjuvant treatment; endometrial cancer (EC); minimally invasive surgery (MIS); open surgery (OS)Highlights•Certain patients with endometrial cancer at an early stage may be candidates for minimally invasive surgical. •There are several benefits to treating early endometrial cancer with minimally invasive surgical.•Selecting patients for minimally invasive treatments of early-stage endometrial cancer and performing thorough preoperative evaluations are essential for maximizing the probability of success.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240830 Date Completed: 20241109 Latest Revision: 20241205
    • Publication Date:
      20241209
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11613008
    • Accession Number:
      10.3233/THC-240439
    • Accession Number:
      39213110