Revisiting the philosophy of technology and nursing: Time to move beyond romancing resistance or resisting romance.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Bayuo J;Bayuo J;Bayuo J
  • Source:
    Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals [Nurs Philos] 2024 Oct; Vol. 25 (4), pp. e12503.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100897394 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1466-769X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14667681 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nurs Philos Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Wiley, c2000-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Technology remains enmeshed in our daily lives and given its continuing presence in clinical practice and rapid technological proliferation; it becomes relevant for nurses to examine techno-onto-epistemology in relation to the discipline of nursing. This is critical considering the intersection of technology and nursing remains an area of ongoing discussion revealing a need for further philosophical reflection. To this end, this paper sought to examine the philosophy of technology from the engineering and humanities perspectives to contribute to the discussion regarding its intersection with the onto-epistemology of nursing. Although technology seems to be constantly present in nursing practice, two opposing perspectives reflecting a love-hate relationship is highlighted: technological optimism (promotes technology) and technological romanticism (dissuades technology). Based on Mitcham's interpretation of 'mutual relationship' and 'being-with', a potential way to break away from the binary perspectives is to view the intersection of/relationship between technology and nursing as being on a continuum rather than entirely monolithic entities. Caring is presented as multidimensional reflecting actions and attitudes. Arguably, some caring actions may intersect with the engineering perspective to suggest that technology can support nurses in their roles, that is, by imitating some of what nurses do, but not to replace them. From the humanities perspective, technology is presented as a way of being with humans exercising control over what technology has to offer. Put together, it is clearly time to break away from the love-hate relationship between nursing and technology. Although this emphasises a great need to build the technological competency of nurses, there is an even greater call for nurses to reflect on and voice the epistemological, ontological, axiological, and ethical issues that the application of technology raises for the discipline.
      (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      AACN. (2021). American Association of Colleges of Nursing‐AACN The essentials: Core competencies for professional education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Publications/Essentials-2021.pdf.
      Archibald, M. M. & Barnard, A. (2018). Futurism in nursing: Technology, robotics and the fundamentals of care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(11–12), 2473–2480.
      Barnard, A. (1996). Technology and nursing: An anatomy of definition. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 33(4), 433–441.
      Barnard, A. (2002). Philosophy of technology and nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 3(1), 15–26.
      Barr, J., Downs, B., Ferrell, K., Talebian, M., Robinson, S., Kolodisner, L., Kendall, H., & Holdych, J. (2024). Improving outcomes in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients following implementation of the ICU liberation (ABCDEF) bundle across a large healthcare system. Critical Care Explorations, 6(1), e1001.
      Barnard, A., & Sandelowski, M. (2001). Technology and humane nursing care: (ir) reconcilable or invented difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(3), 367–375.
      Bayuo, J., Abu‐Odah, H., Su, J. J., & Aziato, L. (2023). Technology: A metaparadigm concept of nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 30(4), e12592.
      Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
      Browne, M., & Cook, P. (2011). Inappropriate trust in technology: Implications for critical care nurses. Nursing in Critical Care, 16(2), 92–98.
      Cooper, M. C. (1993). The intersection of technology and care in the ICU. Advances in Nursing Science, 15(3), 23–32.
      Dessauer, F. (1927). Philosophie der Technik: Das Problem der Realisierung. Cohen.
      Dessauer, F. (1956). Streit um die Technik, Frankfurt 1958 (erw. Neuauflage der “Philosophie der Technik”, Bonn 1926). Erbe und Zukunft des Abendlandes.
      Dessauer, F. (1972). Technology in its proper sphere. Philosophy and Technology, 317–334.
      Doorenbos, A. Z., Jang, M. K., Li, H., & Lally, R. M. (2020). eHealth education: Methods to enhance oncology nurse, patient, and caregiver teaching. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 24(3), 42–48.
      Ely, E. W. (2017). The ABCDEF bundle: Science and philosophy of how ICU liberation serves patients and families. Critical Care Medicine, 45(2), 321–330.
      Ferguson, C., Davidson, P. M., Scott, P. J., Jackson, D., & Hickman, L. D. (2015). Augmented reality, virtual reality and gaming: An integral part of nursing. Contemporary Nurse, 51(1), 1–4.
      Foronda, C. L., Alfes, C. M., Dev, P., Kleinheksel, A. J., Nelson, Jr., D. A., O'Donnell, J. M., & Samosky, J. T. (2017). Virtually nursing: Emerging technologies in nursing education. Nurse Educator, 42(1), 14–17.
      Gadow, S. (1984). Touch and technology: Two paradigms of patient care. Journal of Religion & Health, 23, 63–69.
      von Gerich, H., Moen, H., Block, L. J., Chu, C. H., DeForest, H., Hobensack, M., Michalowski, M., Mitchell, J., Nibber, R., Olalia, M. A., Pruinelli, L., Ronquillo, C. E., Topaz, M., & Peltonen, L. M. (2022). Artificial Intelligence‐based technologies in nursing: A scoping literature review of the evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 127, 104153.
      Hartmann, F. (2016). Of artifacts and organs: World telegraph cables and Ernst Kapp's philosophy of technology, In Information Beyond Borders (pp. 23–34). Routledge.
      Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. Harper & Row. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf.
      Heidegger, M. (1993). The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
      Hsieh, C. J., Li, P. S., Wang, C. H., Lin, S. L., Hsu, T. C., & Tsai, C. M. T. (2023). Socially assistive robots for people living with dementia in long‐term facilities: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gerontology, 69(8), 1027–1042.
      Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology (626). Indiana University Press.
      Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Paragon House.
      Ihde, D. (1995). Philosophy of technology, 1975‐1995. Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, 1(1/2), 8–12.
      Johnson, E., & Carrington, J. M. (2023). Revisiting the nursing metaparadigm: Acknowledging technology as foundational to progressing nursing knowledge. Nursing Inquiry, 30(1), e12502.
      Kapp, E. (2018). Elements of a philosophy of technology: On the evolutionary history of culture. U of Minnesota Press.
      Lin, Y. H., & Lou, M. F. (2021). Effects of mHealth‐based interventions on health literacy and related factors: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(3), 385–394.
      Locsin, R. C. (2016). Technological competency as caring in nursing: Co‐creating moments in nursing occurring within the universal technological domain. Journal of Theory construction & testing, 20(1), 5.
      Maalouf, N., Sidaoui, A., Elhajj, I. H., & Asmar, D. (2018). Robotics in nursing: A scoping review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 50(6), 590–600.
      McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2021). The person‐centred nursing framework. Person‐centred nursing research: Methodology, methods and outcomes (pp. 13–27). Springer International Publishing.
      Mitcham, C. (2022). EPILOGUE Three Ways of Being‐with Technology, In Thinking through Technology (pp. 275–300). University of Chicago Press.
      Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
      Mitcham, C. (2022). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
      O'Lynn, C. & Krautscheid, L. (2011). ‘How should I touch you?’: A qualitative study of attitudes on intimate touch in nursing care. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 111(3), 24–31.
      Papakostas, G. A., Sidiropoulos, G. K., Papadopoulou, C. I., Vrochidou, E., Kaburlasos, V. G., Papadopoulou, M. T., Holeva, V., Nikopoulou, V. A., & Dalivigkas, N. (2021). Social robots in special education: A systematic review. Electronics, 10(12), 1398.
      Petrovskaya, O. (2023). Technology and nursing, In Routledge Handbook of Philosophy and Nursing (pp. 481–493). Routledge.
      Pun, B. T., Balas, M. C., Barnes‐Daly, M. A., Thompson, J. L., Aldrich, J. M., Barr, J., Byrum, D., Carson, S. S., Devlin, J. W., Engel, H. J., Esbrook, C. L., Hargett, K. D., Harmon, L., Hielsberg, C., Jackson, J. C., Kelly, T. L., Kumar, V., Millner, L., Morse, A., … Ely, E. W. (2019). Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: Results of the ICU liberation collaborative in over 15,000 adults. Critical Care Medicine, 47(1), 3–14.
      Sandelowski, M. (2023). Visible humans, vanishing bodies, and virtual nursing: Complications of life, presence, place, and identity, In Medical Anthropology (pp. 503–515). Routledge.
      Sawik, B., Tobis, S., Baum, E., Suwalska, A., Kropińska, S., Stachnik, K., & Wieczorowska‐Tobis, K. (2023). Robots for elderly care: Review, multi‐criteria optimization model and qualitative case study, In Healthcare (11, No. 9, p. 1286). MDPI.
      Sun, W., & Zhang, M. (2015). Technology from the humanistic perspective: The social and cultural results of the technological development. In The “New Culture”. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐662‐48011‐3_7.
      Vargo, D., Zhu, L., Benwell, B., & Yan, Z. (2021). Digital technology use during COVID‐19 pandemic: A rapid review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 13–24.
      Walters, A. J. (1995). Technology and the lifeworld of critical care nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(2), 338–346.
      Walz, A., Canter, M. O., & Betters, K. (2020). The ICU liberation bundle and strategies for implementation in pediatrics. Current pediatrics reports, 8, 69–78.
      Wilson, D. (2017). An overview of the application of wearable technology to nursing practice, Nursing forum (Vol. 52, pp. 124–132).
      Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics‐out‐of‐control as a theme in political thought. Mit Press.
      Wolfe, C. (2009). What Is Posthumanism? (Posthumanities; 8). University of Minnesota Press.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: epistemology; nursing; ontology; technology
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240826 Date Completed: 20240826 Latest Revision: 20240826
    • Publication Date:
      20240827
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/nup.12503
    • Accession Number:
      39186482