The 'Paths to everyday life' (PEER) trial - a qualitative study of mechanisms of change from the perspectives of individuals with mental health difficulties participating in peer support groups led by volunteer peers.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Connect Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968559 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-244X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1471244X NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Psychiatry Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
      Peer Group* ; Qualitative Research* ; Mental Disorders*/psychology ; Mental Disorders*/therapy ; Self-Help Groups*; Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Social Support ; Volunteers/psychology
    • Abstract:
      Background: Worldwide, peers support has been shown to play a crucial role in supporting people with mental illness in their personal recovery process and return to everyday life. Qualitiative studies underpinning the mechanisms of change in peer support has been reviewed. However, the findings are primeraly based on the perspectives of peer support workers employed in mental health services. Thus, qualitiative studies elucidating the mechanisms of change from the recipient perspective in mental health service independent civil society settings are higly needed to further contribute to the evidence of peer support. The 'Paths to every day life' (PEER) is evaluated in a randomized trial and is substantiated by qualitative studies investigating the experiences of PEER from the perspectives of the recipients and the facilitators of peer support. The purpose of this qualitative study underpinned by critical realism was to substantiate the PEER intervention program theory by gaining deeper insight into the change mechanisms and elaborate how, when, and under what circumstances the peer support groups potentially had or did not have an impact on personal recovery from the perspectives of the recipients of peer support.
      Methods: Eleven individuals were interviewed at the end of the ten-week group course. The semi-structured realist-inspired interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis was guided by reflective thematic analysis and through an abductive framework based on the program theory. Data were coded and analysed in Nvivo software.
      Results: Four overarching themes were identified that informed and nuanced the program theory: 1) Connectedness as a prerequisite for engagement; 2) A sense of hope by working out new paths to recovery; 3) Seeing new sides of oneself; and 4) Sprout for change.
      Conclusions: This study substantiates the program theory and the quantitative results of the PEER trial by elaborating on mechanisms that were felt to be essential for the personal recovery process from the perspectives of the recipients of the group-based peer support. In addition, the study points out that the opportunities to act in everyday life depended on individual context and where the group participants were on their recovery journey.
      Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04639167.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001 Fall;25(2):134-41. (PMID: 11769979)
      J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):569-581. (PMID: 30411432)
      Community Ment Health J. 2013 Jun;49(3):260-9. (PMID: 22167660)
      Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;63(2):153-71. (PMID: 17137032)
      Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):847-858. (PMID: 36751908)
      BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. (PMID: 25791983)
      JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 1;80(10):1000-1008. (PMID: 37436730)
      BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. (PMID: 34593508)
      Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):727. (PMID: 36056407)
      Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):955-957. (PMID: 28617205)
      J Ment Health. 2019 Aug;28(4):341-344. (PMID: 31070066)
      Schizophr Res. 2012 Apr;136(1-3):36-42. (PMID: 22130108)
      Community Ment Health J. 2015 May;51(4):445-52. (PMID: 25535049)
      Trials. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):774. (PMID: 32912308)
      Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;57(1):90-9. (PMID: 21252359)
      Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 04;4:CD010880. (PMID: 30946482)
      BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):315. (PMID: 34162340)
      J Ment Health. 2019 Dec;28(6):677-688. (PMID: 29260930)
      J Ment Health. 2011 Aug;20(4):392-411. (PMID: 21770786)
      Community Ment Health J. 2012 Aug;48(4):420-30. (PMID: 22460927)
      BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):174. (PMID: 31182058)
      World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20. (PMID: 24497237)
      J Ment Health. 2019 Dec;28(6):640-646. (PMID: 28857639)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 9;18(1):343. (PMID: 29743067)
      Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885. (PMID: 27993338)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. (PMID: 17872937)
      Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Oct;24(5):435-45. (PMID: 24992284)
      Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jun;63(6):541-7. (PMID: 22508435)
      Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 May 15;5(1):11. (PMID: 21569633)
      Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2004 Spring;27(4):392-401. (PMID: 15222150)
      Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52. (PMID: 22130746)
      Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5332-5341. (PMID: 36066104)
      Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. (PMID: 26613970)
      J Ment Health. 2017 Jun;26(3):291-304. (PMID: 27649767)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Civil society; Mental health; Mental illness; Peer support; Personal recovery; Volunteer peers
    • Molecular Sequence:
      ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04639167
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240813 Date Completed: 20240813 Latest Revision: 20240817
    • Publication Date:
      20240817
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11321162
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12888-024-05992-w
    • Accession Number:
      39138435