Common obesity-related anthropometric indices and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population: a prospective cohort study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Wang H;Wang H; Sui L; Sui L; Xu Q; Xu Q; Li M; Li M; Xing Y; Xing Y; Li G; Li G
  • Source:
    Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology [Gynecol Endocrinol] 2024 Dec; Vol. 40 (1), pp. 2390848. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 12.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Informa Healthcare Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8807913 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1473-0766 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09513590 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Gynecol Endocrinol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: London : Informa Healthcare
      Original Publication: [Carnforth, Lancashire ; Park Ridge, N.J.] : Parthenon Pub., [c1987-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: Anthropometric measurement provides a simple, noninvasive approach to evaluate obesity in pregnant women. We aimed to develop a predictive model utilizing anthropometric index for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the most common obesity-related complications during pregnancy.
      Methods: A prospective cohort of 4709 women was enrolled in Qingdao, China. Logistic regression model was constructed to determine the association of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in the first trimester (<14 weeks' gestation) with GDM. The discrimination ability for GDM was assessed using areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Delong tests were performed to compare AUC values between different measures.
      Results: The GDM incidence was 19.50%. GDM risk increased with VAT during early pregnancy, and the risk increased by 117% (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.23-2.83) to 326% (OR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.29-7.91) in pregnant women with the second quartile or above after adjusting for confounders (all p <.05). Combined index using VAT and BMI demonstrated superior predictive power for GDM compared with BMI alone ( p <.05), but didn't differ from VAT ( p> .05). Overall, VAT was positively correlated with GDM occurrence, outperforming BMI, WHR, WHtR and SAT in the predicative model. A first-trimester VAT cutoff of 27.05 mm might be promising for GDM risk stratification.
      Conclusions: First-trimester routine ultrasound screening may facilitate earlier identification and intervention of GDM. Pregnant women with VAT above the optimal threshold (27.05 mm) might benefit from targeted GDM monitoring.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Gestational diabetes mellitus; abdominal obesity; anthropometric index; body fat distribution; visceral adipose tissue
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240813 Date Completed: 20240813 Latest Revision: 20240813
    • Publication Date:
      20240813
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/09513590.2024.2390848
    • Accession Number:
      39135447