Employing the International Classifications of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify relevant categories for disability evaluation in older adults from the research perspective: a systematic review.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Edizioni Minerva Medica Country of Publication: Italy NLM ID: 101465662 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1973-9095 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19739087 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Torino : Edizioni Minerva Medica
    • Subject Terms:
      Disability Evaluation* ; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health* ; Disabled Persons*/classification ; Disabled Persons*/rehabilitation; Humans ; Aged ; Activities of Daily Living ; Geriatric Assessment/methods
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: The objective of this study was to identify relevant aspects for disability evaluation used in scientific literature for older adults.
      Evidence Acquisition: We employed a systematic review methodology as outlined by the ICF Research Branch. The methodology consists of four steps: 1) identifying studies that focus on disability evaluation among older adults; 2) identifying disability measures used in these studies; 3) linking the concepts contained in these measures to ICF categories; 4) conducting frequency analysis.
      Evidence Synthesis: A total of 1942 concepts contained in disability measures from 137 studies were extracted. About 97.7% of the concepts could be linked, and 1862 concepts were linked to 52 second-level ICF categories. Of these, 44 categories found in at least 5% of the studies (range 5.1-85.4%) were selected to develop an outcome set that represents the relevant categories, including five categories in the Body Functions component and 39 categories from the Activities and Participation component.
      Conclusions: The relevant categories identified in our study reflect the essential areas that measure disability for older adults, providing a scientific basis for developing an ICF Core Set for disability evaluation, in combination with further empirical study and expert survey. Information from the outcome set is also valuable for providing a standardized minimal set for disability measurement, which can be used for data comparison across different studies and the development of an ICF-based disability measurement tool.
    • References:
      Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 Sep;31(6):506-16. (PMID: 27475282)
      BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;11(2):e037333. (PMID: 33597130)
      J Rehabil Med. 2005 Jul;37(4):212-8. (PMID: 16024476)
      Eur J Ageing. 2008 Sep 2;5(3):161. (PMID: 28798570)
      Am J Public Health. 2012 Aug;102(8):1508-15. (PMID: 22698013)
      Am J Public Health. 2004 Oct;94(10):1788-94. (PMID: 15451751)
      Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Nov - Dec;85:103901. (PMID: 31352186)
      BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jun 19;7:13. (PMID: 17578574)
      Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;28(6):597-606. (PMID: 22968965)
      J Aging Health. 2016 Oct;28(7):1124-58. (PMID: 27590795)
      Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):214-8. (PMID: 17826582)
      Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):578-88. (PMID: 25813890)
      J Rehabil Med. 2002 Sep;34(5):205-10. (PMID: 12392234)
      Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(25):2337-43. (PMID: 25784203)
      Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Mar 18;7(1):17. (PMID: 25815063)
      BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. (PMID: 33782057)
      BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):42. (PMID: 28143509)
      J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):298-313. (PMID: 24589525)
      Disabil Health J. 2014 Oct;7(4):457-65. (PMID: 25224986)
      Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jun 19;16(1):104. (PMID: 28629413)
      Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 Nov;30(4):697-707. (PMID: 31563163)
      Gerontology. 2011;57(5):405-13. (PMID: 20798482)
      Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Apr 8-22;27(7-8):411-7. (PMID: 16040544)
      J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Feb;64(2):230-6. (PMID: 19196904)
      J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):792-9. (PMID: 10215969)
      J Am Geriatr Soc. 1983 Dec;31(12):721-7. (PMID: 6418786)
      Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):574-583. (PMID: 26984720)
      Autism Res. 2015 Dec;8(6):782-94. (PMID: 25820780)
      J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):357-63. (PMID: 16537355)
      Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 May-Jun;50(3):306-10. (PMID: 19520442)
      Clin Gerontol. 2020 Jan-Feb;43(1):95-103. (PMID: 31397645)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 03;12(4):3814-34. (PMID: 25854297)
      Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392-6. (PMID: 18850352)
      Arch Intern Med. 2001 Nov 26;161(21):2602-7. (PMID: 11718592)
      J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Feb;15(2):150.e1-9. (PMID: 24314698)
      Lancet. 2005 Nov 26;366(9500):1885-93. (PMID: 16310556)
      J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Apr;66(4):467-73. (PMID: 21300745)
      Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(11):884-93. (PMID: 23930643)
      Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;51(1):105-17. (PMID: 24686893)
      Exp Gerontol. 2020 Dec;142:111123. (PMID: 33191210)
      PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220157. (PMID: 31348797)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240729 Date Completed: 20241104 Latest Revision: 20241116
    • Publication Date:
      20241116
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11561473
    • Accession Number:
      10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08320-5
    • Accession Number:
      39073357