Team pro-social rule breaking and team innovation performance: An information processing theory perspective.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Author(s): Miao G;Miao G;Miao G; Chen G; Chen G; Yao Y; Yao Y
  • Source:
    PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jul 11; Vol. 19 (7), pp. e0303800. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 11 (Print Publication: 2024).
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
      Organizational Innovation*; Humans ; China ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Cooperative Behavior ; Leadership ; Group Processes
    • Abstract:
      Exploring the antecedents that affect the team innovation performance can better promote the organization to research the potential factors to enhance the organizational innovation competitiveness. Drawing upon information processing theory, we develop a moderated mediation model to examine the relationship between team pro-social rule breaking and team innovation performance. A three-wave field study is constructed from two large manufacturing enterprises from 82 team leaders and their 382 subordinates in Shanghai, China. The results reveal that team pro-social rule breaking is positively related to team innovation performance through team reflexivity. In addition, the relationship between team pro-social rule breaking and team innovation performance via team reflexivity is positive only when team learning orientation is high. The implications, limitations, and future research directions of these findings are discussed.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Miao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1103-1116. (PMID: 30843704)
      Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:751446. (PMID: 34733217)
      Int J Hosp Manag. 2022 May;103:103225. (PMID: 35946038)
      J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):552-60. (PMID: 12814303)
      J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):974-88. (PMID: 23895039)
      Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. (PMID: 26821081)
      Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):107-18. (PMID: 10836564)
      Adm Sci Q. 1978 Jun;23(2):224-53. (PMID: 10307892)
      J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):732-58. (PMID: 23915429)
      J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1189-207. (PMID: 17100478)
      Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Oct 11;14:1691-1706. (PMID: 34703333)
      J Appl Psychol. 2015 May;100(3):735-48. (PMID: 25384202)
      Psychol Rep. 2021 Oct;124(5):2155-2179. (PMID: 32878545)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240711 Date Completed: 20240711 Latest Revision: 20240714
    • Publication Date:
      20240714
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11239028
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0303800
    • Accession Number:
      38990921