Therapy effect on hand function after home use of a wearable assistive soft-robotic glove supporting grip strength.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Hand Strength*/physiology ; Hand*/physiology ; Wearable Electronic Devices*; Humans ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Aged ; Self-Help Devices ; Robotics/instrumentation ; Activities of Daily Living

Background: Soft-robotic gloves with an assist-as-needed control have the ability to assist daily activities where needed, while stimulating active and highly functional movements within the user's possibilities. Employment of hand activities with glove support might act as training for unsupported hand function.
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of a grip-supporting soft-robotic glove as an assistive device at home during daily activities.
Methods: This multicentre intervention trial consisted of 3 pre-assessments (averaged if steady state = PRE), one post-assessment (POST), and one follow-up assessment (FU). Participants with chronic hand function limitations were included. Participants used the Carbonhand glove during six weeks in their home environment on their most affected hand. They were free to choose which activities to use the glove with and for how long. The primary outcome measure was grip strength, secondary outcome measures were pinch strength, hand function and glove use time.
Results: 63 patients with limitations in hand function resulting from various disorders were included. Significant improvements (difference PRE-POST) were found for grip strength (+1.9 kg, CI 0.8 to 3.1; p = 0.002) and hand function, as measured by Jebson-Taylor Hand Function Test (-7.7 s, CI -13.4 to -1.9; p = 0.002) and Action Research Arm Test (+1.0 point, IQR 2.0; p≤0.001). Improvements persisted at FU. Pinch strength improved slightly in all fingers over six-week glove use, however these differences didn't achieve significance. Participants used the soft-robotic glove for a total average of 33.0 hours (SD 35.3), equivalent to 330 min/week (SD 354) or 47 min/day (SD 51). No serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: The present findings showed that six weeks use of a grip-supporting soft-robotic glove as an assistive device at home resulted in a therapeutic effect on unsupported grip strength and hand function. The glove use time also showed that this wearable, lightweight glove was able to assist participants with the performance of daily tasks for prolonged periods.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Kottink et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. (PMID: 33275908)
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul;18(5):658-672. (PMID: 33861684)
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2181-6. (PMID: 12907818)
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 6;14(8):e0220544. (PMID: 31386685)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11:CD006073. (PMID: 27841442)
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:1401-1406. (PMID: 28814016)
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2022;30:1737-1744. (PMID: 35731756)
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):23-8. (PMID: 18184204)
Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 09;11:547. (PMID: 29062267)
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):1641-1657. (PMID: 35089447)
Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11):2529-39. (PMID: 15472114)
J Hand Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;34(3):396-403. (PMID: 32156578)
Assist Technol. 2020;32(1):9-15. (PMID: 29601251)
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Feb 11;19(1):17. (PMID: 35148786)
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020 Jun;28(6):1407-1415. (PMID: 32305931)
Wearable Technol. 2021 Nov 21;2:e14. (PMID: 38486636)
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Mar;31(3):351-360. (PMID: 27056250)
J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78. (PMID: 30774209)
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Feb;31(2):207-216. (PMID: 26869596)
Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):361-6. (PMID: 14998794)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Mar;101(3):553-565. (PMID: 31730754)
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Apr;41(5):327-31. (PMID: 19363564)
Soft Robot. 2021 Apr;8(2):128-143. (PMID: 32552422)
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(4):e34200. (PMID: 35380115)
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Mar 5;17(1):40. (PMID: 32138780)
Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):342-54. (PMID: 27447365)
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2020 Jul 20;2020:2724783. (PMID: 32802156)
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2020 Dec 15;7:2055668320964050. (PMID: 33403121)
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jun 29;13(1):62. (PMID: 27357107)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2536-41. (PMID: 24817380)
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2016 Nov 29;3:2055668316670553. (PMID: 31186913)
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 02;13(6):. (PMID: 37371378)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1693-700. (PMID: 18760153)
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Dec;56(12):6089-6098. (PMID: 36342498)
Exp Gerontol. 1999 Jun;34(3):393-405. (PMID: 10433393)
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Dec;29(8):539-550. (PMID: 34420498)
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 28;15(1):59. (PMID: 29954401)
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):513-20. (PMID: 17398254)
Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):241-56. (PMID: 17039223)
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Aug 22;4(8):e1000133. (PMID: 18769588)
Front Neurol. 2023 Jan 11;13:887205. (PMID: 36712422)
Curr J Neurol. 2022 Apr 4;21(2):125-132. (PMID: 38011474)

Date Created: 20240711 Date Completed: 20240711 Latest Revision: 20240714

20240714

PMC11239026

10.1371/journal.pone.0306713

38990858