High-impact practices in cancer education and research: Undergraduate students' perceptions of skills and career development.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Publication Information:
      Ahead of Print
    • Source:
      Publisher: John Wiley & sons Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 100970605 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1539-3429 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14708175 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Biochem Mol Biol Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2002- : Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & sons
      Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Elsevier, c2000-
    • Abstract:
      High-impact practices (HIPs) are educational practices that foster student success. HIPs have not been widely used in cancer education and research despite the need for students to develop key transferable skills and cultivate social responsibility. Our study addresses this need by implementing four community-based learning HIPs within the context of cancer education and research. Each HIP was classified as having low, moderate, or high alignment with the traits of effective HIPs. Undergraduate science students participated in one to four HIPs as a Feedback Participant, General Volunteer, Student Leader, or Cancer Undergraduate Research and Education (CURES) Class Student. We then studied the effect of these HIPs on students' development of knowledge and skills; career interest and preparedness; and social responsibility. Results from self-reported questionnaires showed that HIPs increased students' cancer knowledge and developed their transferable and technical skills. Many students reported that these HIPs strongly impacted their career preparedness; positively influenced their interest in pursuing careers in health or biomedical sciences; and encouraged them to participate in community service activities. Thus, these findings provide new insights into the perceived benefits of HIPs in cancer education and research by undergraduate students.
      (© 2024 The Author(s). Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.)
    • References:
      Kuh GD. High‐impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2008. https://www.aacu.org/publication/high‐impact‐educational‐practices‐what‐they‐are‐who‐has‐access‐to‐them‐and‐why‐they‐matter.
      Kuh G, O'Donnell K, Schneider CG. Hips at ten. Change: Mag High Learn. 2017;49(5):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366805.
      Watson C, Kuh GD, Rhodes T, Penny Light T, Chen HL. ePortfolios: the eleventh high‐impact practice. Int J ePortfolio. 2016;6:65–69. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP254.pdf.
      Brownell JE, Swaner LE. Five high‐impact practices: research on learning outcomes, completion and quality. Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2010 https://www.aacu.org/publication/five‐high‐impact‐practices‐research‐on‐learning‐outcomes‐completion‐and‐quality.
      Gipson J, Mitchell D Jr. How high‐impact practices influence academic achievement for African American college students. JCSCORE. 2019;3(2):123–144. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2017.3.2.123-144.
      Hakel MD, Smith EN. Documenting the outcomes of learning. In: Cambridge D, Cambridge BL, Yancey KB, editors. Electronic portfolios 2.0: emergent research on implementation and impact. Sterling, VA:Stylus Publishing; 2009. p. 133–136.
      McDaniel A, Van Jura M. High‐impact practices: evaluating their effect on college completion. J Coll Stud Reten Res Theor Pract. 2020;24(3):740–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120947357.
      Roldan M, Kothari T, Dunn‐Jensen LM. Direct effects of high‐impact practices on the success of business majors in large, mostly nonresidential public universities. J Manag Educ. 2020;44(1):39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919869384.
      Kilgo CA, Ezell Sheets JK, Pascarella ET. The link between high‐impact practices and student learning: some longitudinal evidence. High Educ. 2014;69(4):509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9788-z.
      Dinh TV, Zhang YL. Engagement in high‐impact practices and its influence on community college transfers' STEM degree attainment. Community Coll J Res Pract. 2021;45(11):834–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1824133.
      D'Souza MJ, Shuman KE, Wentzien DE, Roeske KP. Working with the Wesley College Cannon Scholar Program: improving retention, persistence, and success. J STEM Educ. 2018;19(1):31–40.
      Peters AW, Tisdale VA, Swinton D. High‐impact educational practices that promote student achievement in STEM. In: Wilson‐Kennedy ZS, Byrd GS, Kennedy E, Frierson HT, editors. Broadening participation in STEM: effective methods, practices, and programs. Leeds, England:Emerald Publishing Limited; 2019. p. 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-364420190000022008.
      Zhou C, Lewis M. A mobile technology‐based cooperative learning platform for undergraduate biology courses in common college classrooms. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021;49(3):427–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21496.
      Mackenzie SL, Hinchey DM, Cornforth KP. A public health service‐learning capstone: ideal for students, academia and community. Front Public Health. 2019;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00010.
      Hill HM, Karlin M. Reflections on an international research immersion field study as a high impact practice to produce publishable papers by underrepresented undergraduates. Front Psychol. 2019;10:601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00601.
      Imafuku R, Saiki T, Hayakawa K, Sakashita K, Suzuki Y. Rewarding journeys: exploring medical students' learning experiences in international electives. Med Educ. 2021;26(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1913784.
      Frenk J, Chen LC, Chandran L, Groff EO, King R, Meleis A, et al. Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID‐19 pandemic. Lancet. 2022;400(10362):1539–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02092-x.
      Epner DE, Baile WF. Difficult conversations. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):578–584. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000177.
      Fallowfield L. Learning how to communicate in cancer settings. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(6):349–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0765-4.
      Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Cancer Journey Action Group, Education Committee. The framework for achieving excellence in the provision of cancer patient education in Canada. 2009. https://www.iccp‐portal.org/system/files/resources/The‐Framework‐for‐Achieving‐Excellence‐in‐the‐Provision‐of‐Cancer‐Patient‐Education‐in‐Canada.pdf.
      Bylund CL, Brown RF, Bialer PA, Levin TT, Lubrano di Ciccone B, Kissane DW. Developing and implementing an advanced communication training program in oncology at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26(4):604–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0226-y.
      Greenman SJ, Chepp V, Burton S. High‐impact educational practices: leveling the playing field or perpetuating inequity? Teach High Educ. 2021;27(2):267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2000384.
      Miller RL, Rycek RF, Fritson K. The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.050.
      Sweat J, Jones G, Han S, Wolfgram SM. How does high impact practice predict student engagement? A comparison of White and minority students. Int J Scholar Teach Learn. 2013;7(2):Article 17. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070217.
      Sobeck J, Boraggina‐Ballard L, Najor‐Durack A, Lashore T, Olivera A. High impact practices in graduate education: preparing social work students for careers in child welfare. J Soc Work Educ. 2022;59(1):164–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.2019647.
      Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS, Masia BB. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The classification of educational goals: handbook II: affective domain. New York, NY:David McKay Company, Inc; 1973.
      Stofer KA, Chandler JW, Insalaco S, Matyas C, Lannon HJ, Judge J, et al. Two‐year college students report multiple benefits from participation in an integrated geoscience research, coursework, and outreach internship program. Community Coll Rev. 2021;49(4):457–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211026682.
    • Grant Information:
      University of Windsor
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: cancer education; cancer research; career; community‐based learning; high‐impact practices; skill development; undergraduate
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240530 Latest Revision: 20240530
    • Publication Date:
      20240530
    • Accession Number:
      10.1002/bmb.21839
    • Accession Number:
      38813762