Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Enlightenment of robotic gastrectomy from 527 patients with gastric cancer in the minimally invasive era: 5 years of optimizing surgical performance in a high-volume center - a retrospective cohort study.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101228232 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1743-9159 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17439159 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Publication: 2023- : [Philadelphia] : Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Original Publication: London : Surgical Associates Ltd., c2004-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Background: Learning curves have been used in the field of robotic gastrectomy (RG). However, it should be noted that the previous study did not comprehensively investigate all changes related to the learning curve. This study aims to establish a learning curve for radical RG and evaluate its effect on the short-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.
Methods: The clinicopathological data of 527 patients who underwent RG between August 2016 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Learning curves related to the operation time and postoperative hospital stay were determined separately using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Then, the impact of the learning curve on surgical efficacy was analyzed.
Results: Combining the CUSUM curve break points and technical optimization time points, the entire cohort was divided into three phases (patients 1-100, 101-250, and 251-527). The postoperative complication rate and postoperative recovery time tended to decrease significantly with phase advancement ( P <0.05). More extraperigastric examined lymph nodes (LN) were retrieved in phase III than in phase I (I vs. III, 15.12±6.90 vs. 17.40±7.05, P =0.005). The rate of LN noncompliance decreased with phase advancement. Textbook outcome (TO) analysis showed that the learning phase was an independent factor in TO attainment ( P <0.05).
Conclusion: With learning phase advancement, the short-term outcomes were significantly improved. It is possible that our optimization of surgical procedures could have contributed to this improvement. The findings of this study facilitate the safe dissemination of RG in the minimally invasive era.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
- References:
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. (PMID: 27342689)
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111499. (PMID: 25360767)
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):858-867. (PMID: 32889876)
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):521-31. (PMID: 24287319)
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2921-2927. (PMID: 32556694)
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Sep;22(5):1069-1080. (PMID: 30830639)
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May 27;13(5):429-442. (PMID: 34122733)
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3412-3418. (PMID: 30604257)
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):1983-1992. (PMID: 31135850)
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):194-206. (PMID: 33541746)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1258-65. (PMID: 23080320)
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):140-148. (PMID: 32149825)
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):300-311. (PMID: 32101269)
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):983-991. (PMID: 30829698)
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4583-4596. (PMID: 28411345)
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1126-1132. (PMID: 34037206)
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):58-70. (PMID: 29931452)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1547-52. (PMID: 26169636)
J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;111(6):760-7. (PMID: 25580709)
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Apr;17(2):e2212. (PMID: 33340239)
Urology. 2016 Jul;93:104-11. (PMID: 27045710)
Gastric Cancer. 2020 May;23(3):391-402. (PMID: 31686260)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. (PMID: 33538338)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Apr;27(4):783-785. (PMID: 36414912)
BMC Surg. 2016 Sep 20;16(1):65. (PMID: 27646414)
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2651-2660. (PMID: 27743123)
Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):742-750. (PMID: 28240357)
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 12;21(1):288. (PMID: 37697286)
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:15-23. (PMID: 29775735)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar 16;:. (PMID: 35294649)
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):865-872. (PMID: 33058054)
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1662-6. (PMID: 17345142)
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Apr;2(1):10-18. (PMID: 28723441)
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1673-1689. (PMID: 34031848)
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:120-127. (PMID: 29413875)
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):638-645. (PMID: 28187041)
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. (PMID: 15273542)
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3880-3888. (PMID: 31376007)
World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2734-41. (PMID: 26170158)
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. (PMID: 34774726)
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 01;5(4):506-513. (PMID: 30730546)
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e434-e443. (PMID: 33491975)
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1277-e1283. (PMID: 31651533)
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar;8(2):194-201. (PMID: 31032202)
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):60-7. (PMID: 21789643)
BMC Cancer. 2021 Dec 13;21(1):1328. (PMID: 34903191)
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):389-394. (PMID: 32129815)
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;5(2):142-151. (PMID: 31757656)
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):927-32. (PMID: 19474671)
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):949-956. (PMID: 31503017)
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. (PMID: 26352529)
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. (PMID: 28094848)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1152-1162. (PMID: 29736669)
J Endourol. 2016 Feb;30(2):170-6. (PMID: 26154481)
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1759-1771. (PMID: 30756329)
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15394. (PMID: 34321568)
BJS Open. 2020 Feb;4(1):27-44. (PMID: 32011823)
- Molecular Sequence:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05715775
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20240522 Date Completed: 20240914 Latest Revision: 20240914
- Publication Date:
20240914
- Accession Number:
PMC11392220
- Accession Number:
10.1097/JS9.0000000000001652
- Accession Number:
38775618
No Comments.