Multisystem factors contributing to redundant intracranial vascular imaging in the ED.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Mehan WA Jr;Mehan WA Jr; Shin D; Shin D; Buch K; Buch K
  • Source:
    Emergency radiology [Emerg Radiol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 31 (4), pp. 447-453. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 21.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer-Verlag New York Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9431227 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1438-1435 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10703004 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Emerg Radiol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: New York, NY : Springer-Verlag New York Inc
      Original Publication: Baltimore, MD. : Williams & Wilkins, c1994-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: To evaluate the multisystem factors contributing to redundant neurovascular orders in the ED.
      Methods: This was an IRB-approved, retrospective study, performed at a single institution examining a 5-year history of redundant CTA/MRA head and neck (HN) exams performed in the ED for patients with no documented clinical change in mental status/neurological exam necessitating additional imaging. Factors contributing to redundant ordering including provider experience, synchronous order placement, and radiologist recommendations were examined. Additionally, the impact of duplicative imaging in terms of medical cost and ED length of stay was evaluated.
      Results: 250 patients met inclusion criteria with both CTA/MRA of the HN performed during a single ED encounter (total 500 exams). 190 (76%) redundant exams were not recommended by a radiologist and contributed to an added ED length of stay of 3.6 h on average. Provider experience was not a significant contributing factor. 60 (24%) of redundant exams were recommended by a radiologist and were most frequently CTAs needed to clarify an area of artifact/high-grade stenosis/occlusion on a primary MRA exam.
      Conclusion: Evaluation of contributing factors to redundant CTA/MRA HN exams ordering has highlighted multiple associated factors including provider experience, recommendations by radiologists for clarification of MRA findings, as well as systems processes related to synchronous CTA/MRA order placement.
      (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER).)
    • References:
      Savioli G, Ceresa IF, Gri N et al (2022) Emergency Department Overcrowding: understanding the factors to find corresponding solutions. J Pers Med 12:279. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12020279. (PMID: 10.3390/jpm12020279352077698877301)
      Juliusson G, Thorvaldsdottir B, Kristjansson JM, Hannesson P (2019) Diagnostic imaging trends in the emergency department: an extensive single-center experience. Acta Radiol Open 31(7):2058460119860404. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460119860404. (PMID: 10.1177/2058460119860404)
      Selvarajan SK, Levin DC, Parker L (2019) The increasing use of Emergency Department Imaging in the United States: is it appropriate? AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:W180–W184. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.21386. (PMID: 10.2214/AJR.19.2138631237433)
      Prabhakar AM, Gottumukkala RV, Hemingway J et al (2018) Increasing utilization of emergency department neuroimaging in Medicare beneficiaries from 1994 to 2015. Am J Emerg Med 36:680–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.057. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.05729306644)
      ElHabr A, Merdan S, Ayer T, Prater A, Hanna TN, Horný M, Duszak R Jr, Hughes DR (2017) Increasing Utilization of Emergency Department Neuroimaging from 2007 through 2017. AJR Am J Roentgenol 218:165–173. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25864. (PMID: 10.2214/AJR.21.25864)
      Beheshtian E, Emamzadehfard S, Sahraian S et al (2020) Redundant neurovascular imaging: who is to blame and what is the value? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:35–39. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6329. (PMID: 10.3174/ajnr.A6329318065986975323)
      Haley T, Ghaemmaghami V, Loftus T et al (2009) Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. Am J Surg 198:858–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.030. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.03019969142)
      Brown RD Jr, Broderick JP (2014) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology, natural history, management options, and familial screening. Lancet Neurol 13:393–404. (PMID: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70015-824646873)
      Mehan WA Jr, Shin D, Buch K (2023) Effect of provider type on overutilization of CT angiograms of the Head and Neck for patients presenting to the Emergency Department with Nonfocal neurologic symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol. 16:S1546-1440(23)00714-7.
      Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Probst MA et al (201) Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med. 22:390-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12625.
      Rigney GH, King AH, Chung J, Ghoshal S, Jain A, Shi Z, Razak S, Hirsch JA, Lev MH, Buch K, Succi MD (2024) Trends in non-focal neurological chief complaints and CT angiography utilization among adults in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med Mar 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03569-9.
      Litkowski PE, Smetana GW, Zeidel ML, Blanchard MS (2016) Curbing the urge to image. Am J Med 129:1131–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.020. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.06.02027421918)
      Christensen EW, Liu CM, Duszak R Jr et al (2022) Association of State Share of Nonphysician Practitioners with Diagnostic Imaging Ordering among Emergency Department visits for Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open 5:e2241297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41297. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41297363553749650604)
      Valtchinov VI, Ip IK, Khorasani R, Schuur JD, Zurakowski D, Lee J, Raja AS (2019) Use of Imaging in the Emergency Department: do Individual Physicians contribute to Variation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:637–643. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.21065. (PMID: 10.2214/AJR.18.2106531063428)
      Roshanov PS, You JJ, Dhaliwal J, Koff D, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB (2011) CCDSS Systematic Review Team. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners’ diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci 3:6:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-88. (PMID: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-88)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: CT angiography; Emergency radiology; MR angiography; Neuroradiology
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240520 Date Completed: 20240730 Latest Revision: 20240730
    • Publication Date:
      20240730
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s10140-024-02240-2
    • Accession Number:
      38769220