Different memory systems in food-hoarding birds: A response to Pravosudov.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101155056 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1543-4508 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15434494 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Learn Behav Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2011- : New York : Springer
      Original Publication: Austin, Tex. : Psychonomic Society, c2003-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      We recently showed that food-hoarding birds use familiarity processes more than recollection processes when remembering the spatial location of their caches (Smulders et al., Animal Cognition 26:1929-1943, 2023). Pravosudov (Learning & Behavior, https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x , 2023) called our findings into question, claiming that our method is unable to distinguish between recollection and familiarity, and that associative learning tasks are a better way to study the memory for cache sites. In this response, we argue that our methods would have been more likely to detect recollection than familiarity, if Pravosudov's assertions were correct. We also point out that associative learning mechanisms may be good for building semantic knowledge, but are incompatible with the needs of cache site memory, which requires the unique encoding of caching events.
      (© 2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.)
    • References:
      Crystal, J. D. (2021). Evaluating evidence from animal models of episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 47(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000294. (PMID: 10.1037/xan000029434618532)
      Feeney, M. C., Roberts, W. A., & Sherry, D. F. (2009). Memory for what, where, and when in the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Animal Cognition, 12(6), 767–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0236-x.
      Hitchcock, C. L., & Sherry, D. F. (1990). Long-term memory for cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Animal Behaviour, 40, 701–712. (PMID: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80699-2)
      Krebs, J. R., Sherry, D. F., Healy, S. D., Perry, V. H., & Vaccarino, A. L. (1989). Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 86, 1388–1392. (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.13882919184286696)
      Male, L. H., & Smulders, T. V. (2007). Memory decay and cache site preferences in hoarding coal tits—A laboratory study. Behaviour, 144, 693–710. (PMID: 10.1163/156853907781347808)
      McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.4197624455)
      O’Reilly, R. C., Bhattacharyya, R., Howard, M. D., & Ketz, N. (2014). Complementary learning systems. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01214.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01214.x22141588)
      Pravosudov, V. V. (2023). Multiple cache recovery task cannot determine memory mechanisms. Learning & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x. (PMID: 10.3758/s13420-023-00616-x)
      Pravosudov, V. V., & Roth, T. C. (2013). Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: The evolution of spatial memory and the hippocampus. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 44(44), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135904. (PMID: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135904)
      Roth, T. C., LaDage, L. D., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2012). Evidence for long-term spatial memory in a parid. Animal Cognition, 15(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0440-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10071-011-0440-321773746)
      Sherry, D. F., Krebs, J. R., & Cowie, R. J. (1981). Memory for the location of stored food in marsh tits. Animal Behavior, 29, 1260–1266. (PMID: 10.1016/S0003-3472(81)80078-4)
      Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L. (1987). The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94(4), 439–454. (PMID: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.439)
      Sherry, D. F., & Vaccarino, A. L. (1989). Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103(2), 308–318. (PMID: 10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.308)
      Sherry, D. F., Vaccarino, A. L., Buckenham, K., & Herz, R. S. (1989). The hippocampal complex of food-storing birds. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 34, 308–317. (PMID: 10.1159/0001165162611638)
      Shettleworth, S. J. (1983). Memory in food-hoarding birds. Scientific American, 248(3), 102–110. (PMID: 10.1038/scientificamerican0383-102)
      Smulders, T. V., Douglas, L. J., Reza, D., Male, L. H., Prysce, A., Alix, A., de Guzman Dodd, A., & Read, J. C. A. (2023). Hoarding titmice predominantly use Familiarity, and not Recollection, when remembering cache locations. Animal Cognition, 26, 1929–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01829-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10071-023-01829-33786561910769918)
      Sonnenberg, B. R., Branch, C. L., Pitera, A. M., Bridge, E., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2019). Natural selection and spatial cognition in wild food-caching mountain chickadees. Current Biology, 29(4), 670-676.e673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.00630744977)
      Striedter, G. F. (2016). Evolution of the hippocampus in reptiles and birds. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 524(3), 496–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23803. (PMID: 10.1002/cne.2380325982694)
      Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1341-1354. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7983467.
      Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W.-C., & Koen, J. D. (2010). Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions. Hippocampus, 20(11), 1178–1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20864. (PMID: 10.1002/hipo.20864208486064251874)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240516 Date Completed: 20241209 Latest Revision: 20241209
    • Publication Date:
      20241210
    • Accession Number:
      10.3758/s13420-024-00630-7
    • Accession Number:
      38755512