How different of the rhizospheric and endophytic microbial compositions in watermelons with different fruit shapes.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Fruit shape is an important character of watermelon. And the compositions of rhizospheric and endophytic microorganisms of watermelon with different fruit shape also remains unclear. To elucidate the biological mechanism of watermelon fruit shape formations, the rhizospheric and endophytic microbial community compositions between oval (OW) and circular watermelons (CW) were analyzed. The results showed that except of the rhizospheric bacterial richness (P < 0.05), the rhizospheric and endophytic microbial (bacterial and fungal) diversity were not statistically significant between OW and CW (P > 0.05). However, the endophytic microbial (bacterial and fungal) compositions were significantly different. Firstly, Bacillus, Rhodanobacter, Cupriavidus, Luteimonas, and Devosia were the unique soil dominant bacterial genera in rhizospheres of circular watermelon (CW); In contrast, Nocardioides, Ensifer, and Saccharomonospora were the special soil dominant bacterial genera in rhizospheres of oval watermelons (OW); Meanwhile, Cephalotrichum, Neocosmospora, Phialosimplex, and Papulaspora were the unique soil dominant fungal genera in rhizospheres of circular watermelon (CW); By contrast, Acremonium, Cladosporium, Cryptococcus_f__Tremellaceae, Sodiomyces, Microascus, Conocybe, Sporidiobolus, and Acremonium were the unique soil dominant fungal genera in rhizospheres of oval watermelons (OW). Additionally, Lechevalieria, Pseudorhodoferax, Pseudomonas, Massilia, Flavobacterium, Aeromicrobium, Stenotrophomonas, Pseudonocardia, Novosphingobium, Melittangium, and Herpetosiphon were the unique dominant endophytic bacterial genera in stems of CW; In contrast, Falsirhodobacter, Kocuria, and Kineosporia were the special dominant endophytic genera in stems of OW; Moreover, Lectera and Fusarium were the unique dominant endophytic fungal genera in stems of CW; By contrast, Cercospora only was the special dominant endophytic fungal genus in stems of OW. All above results suggested that watermelons with different fruit shapes exactly recruited various microorganisms in rhizospheres and stems. Meanwhile, the enrichments of the different rhizosphric and endophytic microorganisms could be speculated in relating to watermelon fruit shapes formation.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Xiao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0402722. (PMID: 36622169)
      Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2020 Aug;113(8):1075-1107. (PMID: 32488494)
      Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013 May;66:1-9. (PMID: 23454292)
      AMB Express. 2021 Dec 17;11(1):172. (PMID: 34919198)
      New Phytol. 2022 Jun;234(6):1919-1928. (PMID: 35114015)
      BMC Genomics. 2008 Jun 05;9:275. (PMID: 18534026)
      Mol Plant. 2022 Aug 1;15(8):1268-1284. (PMID: 35746868)
      Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Apr;131(4):947-958. (PMID: 29362832)
      Scientifica (Cairo). 2019 Apr 2;2019:9106395. (PMID: 31065398)
      Front Microbiol. 2021 Sep 06;12:722626. (PMID: 34552573)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):E11542-E11550. (PMID: 30455308)
      Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 25;20(15):. (PMID: 31349588)
      Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 7;7(1):2950. (PMID: 28592854)
      Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Jul;18(7):784-8. (PMID: 10888850)
      World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Sep;31(9):1461-6. (PMID: 26081602)
      Molecules. 2012 Sep 07;17(9):10754-73. (PMID: 22960869)
      Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15;12(1):6360. (PMID: 35428856)
      Protoplasma. 2020 May;257(3):853-861. (PMID: 31863170)
      Hortic Res. 2019 Feb 1;6:19. (PMID: 30729009)
      PLoS One. 2022 Apr 12;17(4):e0266949. (PMID: 35413083)
      J Adv Res. 2017 Nov;8(6):687-695. (PMID: 28951786)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240516 Date Completed: 20240516 Latest Revision: 20240518
    • Publication Date:
      20240518
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11098346
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0302462
    • Accession Number:
      38753836