Development and implementation of local pediatric anesthesia performance metrics at a Canadian children's hospital: a technical report.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Transliterated Title:
      Élaboration et mise en œuvre de mesures de productivité de l’anesthésie pédiatrique localement dans un hôpital canadien pour enfants : un rapport technique.
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer New York Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8701709 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1496-8975 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0832610X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Can J Anaesth Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: New York : Springer New York
      Original Publication: [Toronto, Ont.] : Canadian Anaesthetists' Society, [c1987-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: In this project, we sought to develop and implement pediatric anesthesia metrics into electronic health records (EHR) in a hospital setting to improve quality and safety of patient care. While there has been an upsurge in metric-driven health care, specific metrics catering to pediatric anesthesia remain lacking despite widespread use of EHR. The rapid proliferation and implementation of EHR presents opportunities to develop and implement metrics appropriate to local patient care, in this case pediatric anesthesia, with the strategic goal of enhancing quality and safety of patient care, while also delivering transparency in reporting of such metrics.
      Clinical Features: Using a quasi-nominal consensus group design, we collected requirements from attending anesthesiologists using Agile methodology. Forty-five metrics addressing quality of care (e.g., induction experience, anesthesia delivery, unanticipated events, and postanesthetic care unit stay) and provider performance (e.g., bundle-compliance, collaboration, skills assurance) were developed. Implementation involved integration into the EHR followed by transition from PDF-based feedback to interactive Power BI (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) dashboards.
      Conclusion: We introduced and implemented customized pediatric anesthesia metrics within an academic pediatric hospital; however, this framework is easily adaptable across multiple clinical specialties and institutions. In harnessing data-collecting and reporting properties of EHR, the metrics we describe provide insights that facilitate real-time monitoring and foster a culture of continuous learning in line with strategic goals of high-reliability organizations.
      (© 2024. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.)
    • References:
      Ali U, Tsang M, Campbell F, et al. Reducing postoperative pain in children undergoing strabismus surgery: from bundle implementation to clinical decision support tools. Paediatr Anaesth 2020; 30: 415–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13811. (PMID: 10.1111/pan.1381131889371)
      Sharma P, Parasa S, Shaheen N. Developing quality metrics for upper endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.048. (PMID: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.04831626753)
      Savulescu J, Vergano M, Craxì L, Wilkinson D. An ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 253–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.028. (PMID: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.02832560912)
      Mangione-Smith R, Decristofaro AH, Setodji CM, et al. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1515–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa064637. (PMID: 10.1056/nejmsa06463717928599)
      Kazemi P, Lau F, Matava C, Simpao AF. An environmental scan of anesthesia information management systems in the American and Canadian marketplace. J Med Syst 2021; 45: 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01781-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s10916-021-01781-034661760)
      Kazemi P, Lau F, Simpao AF, Williams RJ, Matava C. The state of adoption of anesthesia information management systems in Canadian academic anesthesia departments: a survey. Can J Anesth 2021; 68: 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-01924-4. (PMID: 10.1007/s12630-021-01924-433512661)
      Hugé, J, Mukherjee, N. The nominal group technique in ecology & conservation: application and challenges. Methods Ecol Evol 2018; 9: 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12831. (PMID: 10.1111/2041-210X.12831)
      Government of Canada. TCPS-2 (2018)—Chapter 2: Scope and Approach; 2018. Available from URL: https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/tcps2-eptc2_2018_chapter2-chapitre2.html (accessed February 2024).
      Matava CT, Gentry H, Simpao AF, Weintraub A. Standardized Anesthesia InductioN Tool (SAINT)—the development and international adoption of an integrated electronic tool for documenting the induction of anesthesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2023; 33: 347–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14625. (PMID: 10.1111/pan.1462536595336)
      Kokol P, Blažun Vošner H, Kokol M, Završnik J. Role of agile in digital public health transformation. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 899874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.899874. (PMID: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.899874356467549134062)
      Nordmark S, Lindberg I, Zingmark K. “It’s all about time and timing”: nursing staffs’ experiences with an agile development process, from its initial requirements to the deployment of its outcome of ICT solutions to support discharge planning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22: 186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01932-4. (PMID: 10.1186/s12911-022-01932-4358439489288650)
      Blake H, Vaughan B, Bartle C, et al. Managing Minds at Work: development of a digital line manager training program. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138006. (PMID: 10.3390/ijerph19138006358056659266047)
      Deblois S, Lepanto L. Lean and Six Sigma in acute care: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2016; 29: 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhcqa-05-2014-0058. (PMID: 10.1108/ijhcqa-05-2014-005826959898)
      Joseph T, Wax D, Goldstein R, Huang J, McCormick PJ, Levin MA. A web-based perioperative dashboard as a platfrom for anesthesia informatics innovation. Anesth Analg 2020; 131: 1640–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005193. (PMID: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005193330798908278241)
      Hensley N, Grant M, Cho B, Suffredini G, Abernathy J. How do we use dashboards to enhance quality in cardiac anesthesia? J Cardio Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 2969–76. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2021.04.034. (PMID: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.04.034)
      Bartels K, Barbeito A, Mackensen G. The anesthesia team of the future. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2022; 6: 687–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e32834c15b6. (PMID: 10.1097/aco.0b013e32834c15b6)
      Shirakawa Y, Noma K, Maeda N, et al. Early intervention of the perioperative multidisciplinary team approach decreases the adverse events during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer patients. Esophagus 2021: 18: 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-021-00844-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s10388-021-00844-y33999305)
      Afshari A, Disma N, von Ungern-Sternberg B, Matava C. COVID-19 implications for pediatric anesthesia: lessons learnt and how to prepare for the next pandemic. Paediatr Anaesth 2022; 32: 385–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14347. (PMID: 10.1111/pan.1434734850493)
      Lin J, Korczak D, Coelho S, et al. Impact of COVID-19 public health protocols on teachers instructing children and adolescents during an in-person simulation. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022; 31: 52–63. (PMID: 356149589084371)
      Matava C, Tighe N, Baertschiger R, et al. Patient and process outcomes among pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international retrospective cohort study. Anesthesiology 2023; 139: 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000004570. (PMID: 10.1097/aln.000000000000457037014980)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: anesthesia; informatics; perioperative; quality improvement
      Local Abstract: [Publisher, French] RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Dans le cadre de ce projet, nous avons cherché à développer et à mettre en œuvre des mesures d’anesthésie pédiatrique dans les dossiers de santé électroniques (DSE) en milieu hospitalier afin d’améliorer la qualité et la sécurité des soins aux patient·es. Bien qu’il y ait eu une recrudescence des soins de santé guidés par les procédures d’évaluation, les mesures spécifiques à l’anesthésie pédiatrique restent insuffisantes malgré l’utilisation généralisée du DSE. La prolifération et la mise en œuvre rapides des DSE offrent des possibilités d’élaborer et de mettre en œuvre des paramètres appropriés aux soins locaux aux patient·es, dans ce cas-ci en anesthésie pédiatrique, dans le but stratégique d’améliorer la qualité et la sécurité des soins tout en assurant la transparence des communications concernant ces paramètres. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: À l’aide d’un modèle de groupe consensuel quasi nominal, nous avons recueilli les exigences des anesthésiologistes traitant·es à l’aide de la méthodologie Agile. Quarante-cinq paramètres portant sur la qualité des soins (p. ex., l’expérience d’induction, l’administration de l’anesthésie, les événements imprévus et le séjour en salle de réveil) et la productivité des prestataires (p. ex., l’observance des forfaits, la collaboration, l’assurance des compétences) ont été élaborés. La mise en œuvre a impliqué l’intégration dans le DSE, suivie de la transition des commentaires en format PDF vers les tableaux de bord interactifs Power BI (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, États-Unis). CONCLUSION: Nous avons introduit et mis en œuvre des mesures personnalisées de l’anesthésie pédiatrique au sein d’un hôpital pédiatrique universitaire. Cependant, ce cadre est facilement adaptable à de multiples spécialités cliniques et institutions. Parce qu’elles exploitent les propriétés de collecte de données et de communications du DSE, les mesures que nous décrivons fournissent des informations qui facilitent la surveillance en temps réel et favorisent une culture d’apprentissage continu conforme aux objectifs stratégiques des organisations à haute fiabilité.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240509 Date Completed: 20240723 Latest Revision: 20240724
    • Publication Date:
      20240726
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s12630-024-02763-9
    • Accession Number:
      38724871