The work performed through interprofessional meeting discourse: an observational study.

Publisher: Informa Healthcare Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9205811 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1469-9567 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13561820 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Interprof Care Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: London : Informa Healthcare
Original Publication: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX, U.K. : Carfax Pub. Co., c1992-

Interprofessional Relations* ; Communication*; Humans ; Group Processes ; Cooperative Behavior ; Patient Care Team/organization & administration ; Female ; Health Personnel/psychology

The effectiveness of work performed through interprofessional practice is contingent on the nature and extent of communication between professionals. To date, there is little research exploring how the patterns of communication may impact interprofessional work. This study focused on communication during interprofessional meetings to better understand the interprofessional work performed through these encounters. Specifically, it examined how interactional discourse, that is, the patterns of language, influenced work performed during interprofessional meetings. A series of four interprofessional meetings in a rehabilitation unit were observed. Twenty-one participants were observed, including medical, nursing, allied health clinicians, and health professions students. Follow-up stimulated-recall interviews were conducted with five meeting participants. The data collection consisted of video and audio recordings and detailed field notes. Data were analyzed using a combination of genre analysis, a form of discourse analysis, and activity system analysis, drawing on Cultural Historical Activity Theory. This facilitated an in-depth examination of the structure of discourse and its influence on meeting outcomes. The meeting structure was defined and predictable. Two distinct forms of discourse were identified and labeled s cripted and unscripted . Scripted discourse was prompted by standardized documents and facilitated the completion of organizational work. In contrast, unscripted discourse was spontaneous dialogue used to co-construct knowledge and contributed to collaboration. There was constant shifting between scripted and unscripted discourse throughout meetings which was orchestrated by experienced clinicians. Rather than fragmenting the discussion, this shifting enabled shared decision making. This research provides further insights into the interprofessional work performed during interprofessional meetings. The scripted discourse was highly influenced by artifacts (communication tools) in meetings, and these were used to ensure organizational imperatives were met. Unscripted discourse facilitated not only new insights and decisions but also social cohesion that may influence work within and outside the meeting.

Keywords: Interprofessional communication; interprofessional meetings; observational research; qualitative research

Date Created: 20240428 Date Completed: 20240530 Latest Revision: 20240718

20240719

10.1080/13561820.2024.2343833

38678369