Comparison of adjustment to a temporary or permanent ostomy using the OAI-23.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Whiteley I;Whiteley I; Randall S; Randall S; Fetheny J; Fetheny J; Stanaway F; Stanaway F
  • Source:
    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland [Colorectal Dis] 2024 Jun; Vol. 26 (6), pp. 1231-1238. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 14.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Observational Study; Comparative Study; Multicenter Study
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Science Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100883611 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1463-1318 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14628910 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Colorectal Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Science Ltd.,
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Aim: The aim of this work was to compare adjustment between those with a new temporary or permanent ostomy in a cohort of Australian adults.
      Method: This is a multicentre, longitudinal observational study. Ostomy adjustment was measured using the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory (OAI-23) at six possible time points ending at 9 months postsurgery or at the time of ostomy closure in those with a temporary stoma. The OAI-23 includes four domains: anger, acceptance, anxious preoccupation and social engagement.
      Results: Eligibility criteria were met by 1230 patients, with 849 (69%) recruited and consented. Of these, 108 were excluded as their surgery did not result in the formation of an ostomy and a further 41 were excluded due to there being no data on ostomy type (temporary or permanent). This left a study population of 700, of whom 397 had a temporary and 303 a permanent ostomy. Only small differences were observed between the temporary and permanent ostomy groups at most time points within the four OAI-23 domains. There were no statistically significant differences found beyond 2 weeks postdischarge and the differences were of small size. While no difference was found between the groups in the domain of anxious preoccupation, both groups demonstrated an increase in anxious preoccupation over time. Neither group regained their presurgery confidence to attend social engagements.
      Conclusion: We found only minor differences in adjustment in those with a new temporary ostomy compared with a new permanent ostomy. Both groups demonstrated increasing anxious preoccupation and problems with social engagement. This suggests that access to education, training and support should be equitable between these two groups in clinical practice, and needs to incorporate a focus on psychological as well as physical outcomes.
      (© 2024 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
    • References:
      Ketterer SN, Leach MJ, Fraser C. Factors associated with quality of life among people living with a stoma in nonmetropolitan areas. Nurs Res. 2021;70(4):281–288.
      Schott LL, Eaves D, Inglese G, Sinha M. Characteristics, hospital length of stay, and readmissions among individuals undergoing abdominal ostomy surgery: review of a large US healthcare database. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(6):529–539.
      Care DoHaA. Stoma Appliance Scheme: Commonwealth of Australia. 2023. Accessed June 2, 2023. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/our‐work/stoma‐appliance‐scheme/stoma‐appliance‐scheme‐for‐ostomates.
      Osborne W, White M, Aibibula M, Boisen EB, Ainsworth R, Vestergaard M. Prevalence of leakage and its negative impact on quality of life in people living with a stoma in the UK. Br J Nurs. 2022;31(16):S24–S38.
      Burgess‐Stocks J, Gleba J, Lawrence K, Mueller S. Ostomy and continent diversion patient bill of rights: research validation of standards of care. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(3):251–260.
      Karadag A, Karabulut H, Baykara ZG, Harputlu D, Toyluk E, Ulusoy B, et al. A prospective, multicentered study to assess social adjustment in patients with an intestinal stoma in Turkey. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015;61(10):16–29.
      Thorpe G, McArthur M. Social adaptation following intestinal stoma formation in people living at home: a longitudinal phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(22):2286–2293.
      Thompson AR. Adaptation in long‐term conditions: the role of stigma particularly in conditions that affect appearance. In: Randell S, Ford H, editors. Long‐term conditions: a guide for nurses and healthcare professionals. 1st ed. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2011. p. 121–137.
      Chan F, Cardoso E, Chronister JA. Understanding psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness and disability: a handbook for evidence‐based practitioners in rehabilitation. New York: Springer Publishing; 2009.
      Chutikamo N, Navicharern R, Lohsiriwat V. Comparative study of health‐related quality of life between colorectal cancer patients with temporary and permanent stoma. Siriraj Med J. 2019;71(3):196–200.
      de Gouveia Santos VL, Chaves EC, Kimura M. Quality of life and coping of persons with temporary and permanent stomas. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006;33(5):503–509.
      Yasan A, Unal S, Gedik E, Girgin S. Quality of life, depression and anxiety among patients who have undergone permanent or temporary ostomy. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2008;9(3):162–168.
      Radcliffe A. An investigation into psychological morbidity and body image disturbances in adult colorectal resection patients. [D.Clin.Psy.]. University of Leicester (United Kingdom) 2014.
      Whiteley I, Randall S, Stanaway FF. Comparison of adjustment or adaptation to the formation of a temporary versus a permanent ostomy: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2024;51(1):39–45.
      Simmons KL, Smith JA, Maekawa A. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Ostomy Adjustment Inventory‐23. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2009;36(1):69–76.
      Heidari‐Beni F, Esmaeilian S, Yousefi F, Zarei MR, Farahani MA. Comparison of face‐to‐face education and multimedia software education on adjustment of patients with intestinal ostomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(2):152–157.
      Taylor A. Standardised Effect Size in a Mixed/Multilevel Model. 2014 Department of Psychology, Macquarie University. Available from: https://alan‐taylor.net/SPSS.html.
      Farahani MA, Sargolzaei MS, Shariatpanahi S, Dehkordi AH, Dalvand P, Heidari‐Beni F. The prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with ostomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psychooncology. 2022;31(12):2020–2035.
      Moraes JT, Borges EL, Santos CF, da Silva ME, de Sá FDS. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in persons with ostomies: a cross‐sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47(6):595–600.
      Knowles SR, Cook SI, Tribbick D. Relationship between health status, illness perceptions, coping strategies and psychological morbidity: a preliminary study with IBD stoma patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7(10):e471–e478.
      Song L, Han X, Zhang J, Tang L. Body image mediates the effect of stoma status on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Psychooncology. 2020;29(4):796–802.
      Hao J, Xu Y, Li H. The value of applying a continuous nursing model based on virtual platforms for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2023;36(4):206–212.
      Ayaz‐Alkaya S. Overview of psychosocial problems in individuals with stoma: a review of literature. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):243–249.
      Ji H, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Wang A. The Progress of social isolation in patients with enterostomy during discharge transition period. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:4940946.
      Koc MA, Akyol C, Gokmen D, Aydin D, Erkek AB, Kuzu MA. Effect of prehabilitation on stoma self‐care, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with stomas: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(1):138–147.
      Choudhary M, Kaur H. Experiences of living with intestinal ostomy: a qualitative meta‐synthesis. Indian J Palliat Care. 2020;26(4):421–427.
      Xi Z, Rong CM, Ling LJ, Hua ZP, Rui G, Fang HG, et al. The influence of stigma and disability acceptance on psychosocial adaptation in patients with stoma: a multicenter cross‐sectional study. Front Psychol. 2022;13:937374.
      Dellafiore F, Manara DF, Arrigoni C, Baroni I, Di Pasquale C, Nania T, et al. Predictors of adjustment to living with an ostomy: results of a cross‐sectional study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022;35(5):1–6.
      Simmons KL, Maekawa A, Smith JA. Culture and psychosocial function in british and Japanese people with an ostomy. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2011;38(4):421–427.
      Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B. Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Montreux study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(2):48–55.
      Karabulut HK, Dinc L, Karadag A. Effects of planned group interactions on the social adaptation of individuals with an intestinal stoma: a quantitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(19–20):2800–2813.
      Liu H, Zhu X, Yu J, He P, Shen B, Tang X, et al. The quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer and a stoma in China: a quantitative cross‐sectional study. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34:302–307.
      Özden ZM, Kılıç M. The effect of self‐efficacy levels of patients with intestinal stoma on stoma adaptation. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(5):252.
      Black P, Notter J. Psychological issues affecting patients living with a stoma. Br J Nurs. 2021;30(6):S20–S32.
      Vonk‐Klaassen SM, de Vocht HM, den Ouden ME, Eddes EH, Schuurmans MJ. Ostomy‐related problems and their impact on quality of life of colorectal cancer ostomates: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(1):125–133.
      Knaak S, Mantler E, Szeto A. Mental illness‐related stigma in healthcare: barriers to access and care and evidence‐based solutions. Healthcare Manage Forum. 2017;30(2):111–116.
      University C. Graduate Certificate in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Practice 2022. Accessed July 1, 2022. Available from: https://handbook.curtin.edu.au/courses/course‐pg‐graduate‐certificate‐in‐wound‐ostomy‐and‐continence‐practice‐‐gc‐wocpv2/.
      AASTN. Standards of Stomal Therapy Nursing Practice. (5th edn); 2022.
      Harris MS, Kelly K, Parise C. Does preoperative ostomy education decrease anxiety in the new ostomy patient? A quantitative comparison cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020;47(2):137–139.
      Zhang Y, Xian H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Wang X. Relationship between psychosocial adaptation and health‐related quality of life of patients with stoma: a descriptive, cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(15–16):2880–2888.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: colostomy; ileostomy; ostomy; stoma; urostomy
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240415 Date Completed: 20240627 Latest Revision: 20241003
    • Publication Date:
      20241004
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/codi.16985
    • Accession Number:
      38616314