Clinical performance and risk factors of all-ceramic screw-retained implant crowns in the posterior region based on a retrospective investigation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: John Wiley and Sons, Inc Country of Publication: Denmark NLM ID: 9105713 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1600-0501 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09057161 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Oral Implants Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2009- : Copenhagen : John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
      Original Publication: Copenhagen : Munksgaard, c1990-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: Clinical data on all-ceramic screw-retained implant crowns (SICs) luted on titanium base abutments (TBAs) over more than 3 years are sparse. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance and potential risk factors for these restorations.
      Materials and Methods: Analysis took place based on the medical patient-records of three dental offices. Implant survival and prosthetic complications over time were evaluated. The study included SICs in premolar and molar regions made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic (M_LiDi) or veneered zirconia (V_ZiO) luted on a TBA documented over an observation time of at least 3 years. Survival and complication rates were calculated and compared by a log-rank test. Cox-Regressions were used to check potential predictors for the survival (p < .05).
      Results: Six hundred and one crowns out of 371 patients met the inclusion criteria and follow-up period was between 3.0 and 12.9 (mean: 6.4 (SD: 2.1)) years. Over time, six implants had to be removed and 16 restorations had to be refabricated. The estimated survival rates over 10 years were 93.5% for M_LiDi and 95.9% for V_ZiO and did not differ significantly among each other (p = .80). However, V_ZiO showed significantly higher complication rates (p = .003). Material selection, sex, age, and implant diameter did not affect the survival of investigated SICs but crown height influences significantly the survival rate (hazard ratio, HR = 1.26 (95%CI: 1.08, 1.49); p = .043).
      Conclusions: Screw-retained SICs luted on TBAs that were fabricated from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic or veneered zirconia showed reliable and similar survival rates. Increasing crown heights reduced survival over the years.
      (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
    • References:
      Bakke, M. (2006). Bite force and occlusion. Seminars in Orthodontics, 12(2), 120–126.
      Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., & Edelhoff, D. (2008). Digital dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. British Dental Journal, 204(9), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350.
      Blanes, R. J. (2009). To what extent does the crown‐implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant‐supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(Suppl 4), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01762.x.
      Burkhardt, F., Sailer, I., Fehmer, V., Mojon, P., & Pitta, J. (2022). Retention and marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fabricated crowns adhesively cemented to titanium base abutments ‐ influence of bonding system and restorative material. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 36, 651. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7576.
      Chantler, J. G. M., Evans, C. D. J., Zitzmann, N. U., & Derksen, W. (2023). Clinical performance of single implant prostheses restored using titanium base abutments: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(Suppl 26), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14128.
      Darby, I. (2022). Risk factors for periodontitis & peri‐implantitis. Periodontology 2000, 90(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12447.
      Derksen, W., Joda, T., Chantler, J., Fehmer, V., Gallucci, G., Gierthmuehlen, P., Pala, K., Pjetursson, B. E., Roccuzzo, M., Sailer, I., Strauss, F. J., Sun, T. C., Wolfart, S., & Zitzmann, N. U. (2023). Group 2 ITI consensus report: Technological developments in implant prosthetics. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34, 104–111.
      Edelhoff, D., Schweiger, J., Prandtner, O., Stimmelmayr, M., & Güth, J. F. (2019a). Metal‐free implant‐supported single‐tooth restorations. Part I: Abutments and cemented crowns. Quintessence International, 50(3), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a41906.
      Edelhoff, D., Schweiger, J., Prandtner, O., Stimmelmayr, M., & Güth, J. F. (2019b). Metal‐free implant‐supported single‐tooth restorations. Part II: Hybrid abutment crowns and material selection. Quintessence International, 50(4), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a42099.
      Ferrario, V. F., Sforza, C., Serrao, G., Dellavia, C., & Tartaglia, G. M. (2004). Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 31(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305‐182x.2003.01179.x.
      Graf, T., Güth, J. F., Schweiger, J., Erdelt, K. J., Edelhoff, D., & Stimmelmayr, M. (2023). Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss‐ an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27, 5887–5894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784‐023‐05199‐5.
      Graf, T., Schweiger, J., Stimmelmayr, M., Erdelt, K., Schubert, O., & Güth, J. F. (2023). Influence of monolithic restorative materials on the implant‐abutment interface of hybrid abutment crowns: An in vitro investigation. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 67(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00115.
      Graf, T., Völler, E., Schweiger, J., Stimmelmayr, M., Güth, J. F., & Erdelt, K. J. (2023). In vitro survival and fracture force of lithium‐disilicate hybrid abutment crowns. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8548.
      Graf, T., Völler, E., Erdelt, K., Stimmelmayr, M., Schubert, O., & Güth, J. F. (2024). Monolithic hybrid abutment crowns: Influence of crown height, crown morphology and material on the implant‐abutment complex. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00253.
      Joda, T., Gintaute, A., Brägger, U., Ferrari, M., Weber, K., & Zitzmann, N. U. (2021). Time‐efficiency and cost‐analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double‐blinded RCT. Journal of Dentistry, 113, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103779.
      Joda, T., Yeung, A. W. K., Hung, K., Zitzmann, N. U., & Bornstein, M. M. (2021). Disruptive innovation in dentistry: What it is and what could be next. Journal of Dental Research, 100(5), 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520978774.
      Jung, R. E., Zembic, A., Pjetursson, B. E., Zwahlen, M., & Thoma, D. S. (2012). Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow‐up of 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl 6), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2012.02547.x.
      Kalk, W., & de Baat, C. (1989). Some factors connected with alveolar bone resorption. Journal of Dentistry, 17(4), 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300‐5712(89)90068‐7.
      Koller, M., Steyer, E., Theisen, K., Stagnell, S., Jakse, N., & Payer, M. (2020). Two‐piece zirconia versus titanium implants after 80 months: Clinical outcomes from a prospective randomized pilot trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(4), 388–396.
      Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2017). Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant‐abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck. Archives of Oral Biology, 83, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.07.022.
      Mühlemann, S., Kraus, R. D., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Thoma, D. S. (2018). Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant‐supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl 18), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13300.
      Nouh, I., Kern, M., Sabet, A. E., Aboelfadl, A. K., Hamdy, A. M., & Chaar, M. S. (2019). Mechanical behavior of posterior all‐ceramic hybrid‐abutment‐crowns versus hybrid‐abutments with separate crowns‐a laboratory study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13395.
      Pellizzer, E. P., de Luna, M., Gomes, J., Araújo Lemos, C. A., Minatel, L., de Oliveira, J., Limírio, J. P., & Dantas de Moraes, S. L. (2021). The influence of crown‐to‐implant ratio in single crowns on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 126(4), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.010.
      Pjetursson, B. E., Sailer, I., Latyshev, A., Rabel, K., Kohal, R. J., & Karasan, D. (2021). A systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(Suppl 21), 254–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13863.
      Pjetursson, B. E., Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Zwahlen, M., & Thoma, D. S. (2015). All‐ceramic or metal‐ceramic tooth‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple‐unit FDPs. Dental Materials, 31(6), 624–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.013.
      Pjetursson, B. E., Valente, N. A., Strasding, M., Zwahlen, M., Liu, S., & Sailer, I. (2018). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic single crowns. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl 16), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13306.
      Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Thoma, D. S., Zwahlen, M., & Pjetursson, B. E. (2015). All‐ceramic or metal‐ceramic tooth‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dental Materials, 31(6), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.
      Sailer, I., Muhlemann, S., Zwahlen, M., Hammerle, C. H., & Schneider, D. (2012). Cemented and screw‐retained implant reconstructions: A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(Suppl 6), 163–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2012.02538.x.
      Schubert, O., Goob, J., Schweiger, J., Güth, J. F., Edelhoff, D., & Graf, T. (2023). Clinical performance of monolithic lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns over at least 3.5 years. Journal of Prosthodontics, 33, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13719.
      Spitznagel, F. A., Boldt, J., & Gierthmuehlen, P. C. (2018). CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. Journal of Dental Research, 97(10), 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518779759.
      Sulaiman, T. A. (2020). Materials in digital dentistry‐a review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 32(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12566.
      Tokmakidis, K., Wessing, B., Papoulia, K., & Spiekermann, H. (2009). Load distribution and loading concepts on teeth and implants. Journal of Dental Implantology, 25(1), 44–52.
      Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457.
      Wittneben, J. G., Joda, T., Weber, H. P., & Brägger, U. (2017). Screw retained vs. cement retained implant‐supported fixed dental prosthesis. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12168.
      Wittneben, J. G., Millen, C., & Bragger, U. (2014). Clinical performance of screw‐ versus cement‐retained fixed implant‐supported reconstructions–A systematic review. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 29(Suppl), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: complication rate; monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic; single implants; titanium base abutments; veneered zirconia
    • Accession Number:
      S38N85C5G0 (zirconium oxide)
      C6V6S92N3C (Zirconium)
      12001-21-7 (Dental Porcelain)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240410 Date Completed: 20240710 Latest Revision: 20240710
    • Publication Date:
      20240710
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/clr.14264
    • Accession Number:
      38594815