Recovery of the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire score and walking ability following lumbar spinal stenosis surgery.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9301980 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-0932 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09406719 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur Spine J Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany : Springer-Verlag, c1992-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: We investigated the recovery of the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores and 6 min walk distance (6MWD) in patients after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and identified the items among 25 questions of JOABPEQ that showed recovery.
      Methods: A total of 227 patients (average age 71.5 years; SD: 7.5; 121 men) were included from a single center. The outcome measures were JOABPEQ, visual analog scale (VAS), and 6MWD and obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Mixed-model repeated measures were used to compare the variables at each time point between the surgery groups.
      Results: The JOABPEQ, VAS, and 6MWD scores generally improved at 1 month postoperatively compared with those obtained preoperatively, and some parameters further improved at 3 months. However, improvement in the lumbar spine dysfunction item of JOABPEQ was delayed, showing improvement at 3 months postoperatively for decompression surgery (average score: pre, 64.6; 3 months, 78.5) and 6 months postoperatively for fusion surgery (average score: Pre, 64.3; 6 months, 77.1). Responses to the individual JOABPEQ questions generally improved after surgery. No significant changes in lumbar spine dysfunction occurred in the fusion group.
      Conclusion: Our results demonstrated the early postoperative recovery course of JOABPEQ and 6MWD. In the fusion group, significant changes in lumbar spine dysfunction started at 6 months postoperatively. These findings could help medical staff explain postoperative recovery to patients after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and in their decision making regarding surgery.
      (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
    • References:
      Yabuki S, Fukumori N, Takegami M et al (2013) Prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, using the diagnostic support tool, and correlated factors in Japan: a population-based study. J Orthop Sci 18:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-013-0455-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00776-013-0455-5239635883838585)
      Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C (2016) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ 352:h6234. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6234. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.h6234267279256887476)
      Fritsch CG, Ferreira ML, Maher CG et al (2017) The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur Spine J 26:324–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4668-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-016-4668-027443531)
      Stienen MN, Ho AL, Staartjes VE et al (2019) Objective measures of functional impairment for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J 19:1276–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.014. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.01430831316)
      Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M et al (2009) JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The subcommittee of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese orthopaedic association on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation. J Orthop Sci 14:348–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1337-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00776-009-1337-819499305)
      Fujimori T, Miwa T, Oda T (2019) Responsiveness of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences. Spine J 19:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.01329792993)
      Fujimori T, Ikegami D, Sugiura T, Sakaura H (2022) Responsiveness of the Zurich claudication questionnaire, the Oswestry disability index, the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire, the 8-item short form health survey, and the Euroqol 5 dimensions 5 level in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 31:1399–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07236-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-022-07236-535524825)
      Kawakami M, Nakao SI, Fukui D et al (2013) Modified marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 38:E1461–E1468. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff4ae. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff4ae23778375)
      Makino T, Kaito T, Fujiwara H et al (2017) Risk factors for poor patient-reported quality of life outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: an analysis of 2-year follow-up. Spine 42:1502–1510. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002137. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.000000000000213728248893)
      Takenaka H, Kamiya M, Sugiura H et al (2023) Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery: 12 months follow-up. Spine 48:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004566. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.000000000000456636728803)
      Lee CS, Kang KC, Chung SS et al (2017) How does back muscle strength change after posterior lumbar interbody fusion? J Neurosurg Spine 26:163–170. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.7.SPINE151132. (PMID: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE15113227740397)
      Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T et al (2016) A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513721. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa151372127074066)
      Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Kunogi J et al (2009) The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 34:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f924d. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f924d19112336)
      Orita S, Yamashita M, Eguchi Y et al (2016) Pregabalin for refractory radicular leg pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary prospective study. Pain Res Manag 2016:5079675. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5079675. (PMID: 10.1155/2016/5079675274456154904630)
      Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J et al (2015) Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 163:373–381. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0934. (PMID: 10.7326/M15-093426302454)
      Ito Z, Matsuyama Y, Sakai Y et al (2010) Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 35:E1101–E1105. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181de4f2e. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181de4f2e20885279)
      ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. (PMID: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102)
      Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244. (PMID: 10.1038/bmt.2012.24423208313)
      Jegede KA, Miller CP, Bible JE, Whang PG, Grauer JN (2011) The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living. Spine 36:2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820921a5. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820921a521358469)
      Kimura H, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B et al (2016) Effects of lumbar stiffness after lumbar fusion surgery on activities of daily living. Spine 41:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001300. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.000000000000130026630422)
      Oba H, Tsutsumimoto T, Yui M et al (2017) A prospective study of recovery from leg numbness following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci 22:670–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.00428456353)
      McIlroy S, Jadhakhan F, Bell D, Rushton A (2021) Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 30:3307–3318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06938-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-021-06938-634351524)
      Tomkins-Lane CC, Battié MC, Macedo LG (2014) Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 14:1936–1943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.030. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.03024291033)
      Ohtori S, Ito T, Yamashita M et al (2010) Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. J Orthop Sci 15:86–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1426-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00776-009-1426-820151256)
      Parai C, Hägg O, Lind B, Brisby H (2019) Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data. Eur Spine J 28:2187–2197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-031041598)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ); Lumbar spinal stenosis; Recovery; Surgery; Walking ability
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240407 Date Completed: 20240628 Latest Revision: 20240908
    • Publication Date:
      20240909
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s00586-024-08238-1
    • Accession Number:
      38584242