The Couples' Closeness-Distance Scale- Observation through joint-drawing: A pilot dyadic validation study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7904614 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1752-0606 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0194472X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Marital Fam Ther Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: <2007->: Malden, Mass. : Blackwell
      Original Publication: Washington, D.C., American Assn. for Marriage and Family Therapy
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The study aimed to evaluate the Couples' Closeness-Distance Scale (CCDS), an observational assessment reflecting couples' relational dynamics; based on joint-drawing, it offers measurable dimensions. Forty cohabiting Israeli couples participated in the joint-drawing task and answered self-report questionnaires for attachment, differentiation of self, and relationship satisfaction. The paintings were assessed by trained observers on the CCDS scales (too distant, too close, autonomy, engagement) for both the women's and men's experiences. A two-level-dyadic model showed that differentiation and relationship satisfaction predicted the CCDS and revealed a "pursue-withdraw cycle": Women sensed the men as too distant, while men sensed the women as too close. Participants' sense of discomfort from their partners' distance related to less autonomy and engagement during the painting, with a greater effect on the women. The pilot implies that the CCDS enables observing dyadic-systemic aspects of couple dynamics and may enrich clinical evaluation.
      (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.)
    • References:
      Anderson, J. R. (2020). Inviting autonomy back to the table: The importance of autonomy for healthy relationship functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12413.
      Appel, Z., Elizur, D., & Cohen, A. (2001). Facets of differentiation of self. In D. Elizur (Ed.), Facet theory: Integrating theory construction with data analysis (pp. 353–365). Matfyzpress.
      Bar‐Shachar, Y., Lopata, S., & Bar‐Kalifa, E. (2023). Relationship satisfaction during COVID‐19: The role of partners' perceived support and attachment. Family Relations, 72(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12767.
      Ben‐Ari, A., & Lavee, Y. (2005). Dyadic characteristics of individual attributes: Attachment, neuroticism, and their relation to marital quality and closeness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(4), 621–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.4.621.
      Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Aronson.
      Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss (Vol 2). Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
      Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self‐report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0062-x.
      Brock, R. L., Ramsdell, E. L., Franz, M. R., & Volk, S. (2020). Validation of a behavioral coding system for measuring mutually responsive orientation in intimate relationships. Psychological Assessment, 32(8), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000826.
      Cockery, L., & Gjerde, P. F. (1989). Romantic attachment interview (RAI) [database record]. PsycTESTS. https://doi.org/10.1037/t35551-000.
      Constant, E., Christophe, V., Bodenmann, G., & Nandrino, J. L. (2021). Attachment orientation and relational intimacy: The mediating role of emotional competences. Current Psychology, 40(403), 1374–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0062-x.
      Corem, S., Snir, S., & Regev, D. (2015). Patients' attachment to therapists in art therapy simulation and their reactions to the experience of using art materials. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 45, 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2015.04.006.
      Czikmantori, T., Hagemeyer, B., & Engeser, S. (2018). A dyadic typology of social desires in couples. Journal of Personality, 86(4), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12338.
      Egozi, S., Tishby, O., & Wiseman, H. (2021a). Changes in clients and therapists' experiences of therapeutic distance during psychodynamic therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23077.
      Egozi, S., Tishby, O., & Wiseman, H. (2021b). Therapeutic distance in client‐therapist narratives: Client attachment, therapist attachment, and dyadic effects. Psychotherapy Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.1874069.
      Estlein, R., & Lavee, Y. (2022). Effect of daily stress on desire for physical proximity and emotional closeness. Journal of Family Issues, 43(4), 1039–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211007528.
      Feeney, J. A. (1999). Issues of closeness and distance in dating relationships: Effects of sex and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(5), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407599165002.
      Feeney, J. A. (2003). The systemic nature of couple relationships: An attachment perspective. In P. Erdman, & T. Caffery (Eds.), Attachment and family systems: Conceptual, empirical, and therapeutic relatedness (pp. 139–163). Brunner‐Routledge.
      Fitzpatrick, J., Gareau, A., Lafontaine, M.‐F., & Gaudreau, P. (2016). How to use the actor‐partner Interdependence Model (APIM) to estimate different dyadic patterns in Mplus: A step‐by‐step tutorial. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.1.p074.
      Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1992). Four types of premarital couples: An empirical typology based on PREPARE. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.6.1.10.
      Furneaux‐Blick, S. (2019). Painting together: How joint activity reinforces the therapeutic relationship with a young person with learning disabilities. International Journal of Art Therapy, 24(4), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2019.1677732.
      Gavron, T. (2013). Meeting on common ground: Assessing parent–child relationships through the joint painting procedure. Art Therapy, 30(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2013.757508.
      Gerschwer, S. (2022). Conflicts over intimacy within mature, happy marriages reliance and reliability in intimate relationships: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 39(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21321.
      Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. Simon & Schuster.
      Hagemeyer, B., Neyer, F. J., Neberich, W., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2013). The ABC of social desires: Affiliation, being alone, and closeness to partner. European Journal of Personality, 27(5), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1857.
      Hagemeyer, B., Schönbrodt, F. D., Neyer, F. J., Neberich, W., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2015). When “together” means “too close”: Agency motives and relationship functioning in coresident and living‐apart‐together couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000031.
      Halford, W. K., Jarukasemthawee, S., Pisitsungkagarn, K., & Foophrateepsiri, W. (2022). Couple relationship standards in Thailand. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000235.
      Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter‐rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
      Hardy, N. R., & Fisher, A. R. (2018). Attachment versus differentiation: The contemporary couple therapy debate. Family Process, 57(2), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12343.
      Ho, R., & Chiu, W. C. (2020). Joint painting for understanding the development of emotional regulation and adjustment between mother and son in expressive arts therapy. In L. McKay, G. Barton, S. Garvis, & V. Sappa (Eds.), Arts‐based research, resilience and well‐being across the lifespan (pp. 127–146). Springer International Publishing.
      Hook, J. N., Hodge, A. S., Sandage, S. J., Davis, D. E., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2023). Differentiation of self and cultural competence: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Practice Innovations, 8(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000196.
      Jose, P. E. (2013). Doing statistical mediation & moderation. Guilford Press.
      Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Barbara, A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. The Guilford Press.
      Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. Norton.
      Lavee, Y. (1995) Marriage quality scale: Clinical and research use [Paper presentation]. Israeli Psychological Society 25th Scientific Conference, Hebrew, Beer Sheva, Israel.
      Lavy, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Autonomy–proximity imbalance: An attachment theory perspective on intrusiveness in romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 552–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.004.
      Lavey‐Khan, S., & Reddick, D. (2020). Painting together: A parent‐child dyadic art therapy group. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 70, 101687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2020.101687.
      Lilliengren, P., Falkenström, F., Sandell, R., Mothander, P. R., & Werbart, A. (2015). Secure attachment to therapist, alliance, and outcome in psychoanalytic psychotherapy with young adults. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000044.
      Marmarosh, C. L. (2013). Measuring group and dyadic attachment styles. In C. L. Marmarosh, R. D. Markin, & E. B. Spiegel (Eds.), Attachment in group psychotherapy (pp. 37–50). Routledge.
      Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
      Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Adult attachment orientations and relationship processes. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 4(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00142.x.
      Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2018). Attachment theory as a framework for studying relationship dynamics and functioning. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 175–185). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.015.
      Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Bar‐On, N., & Ein‐Dor, T. (2010). The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017366.
      Molina, M. E., Tapia‐Villanueva, L., Fossa, P., Pereira, X., Aspillaga, C., & de la Puerta, S. (2019). A methodological approach to couples therapy using a conjoint relational drawing process for the description of and intervention with relational patterns and meaning‐attributions. Journal of Family Therapy, 41(4), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12241.
      Mónaco, E., de la Barrera, U., & Montoya‐Castilla, I. (2022). Are emotional competencies mediators between attachment and relationship satisfaction in young couples. Behavioral Psychology, 30(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.51668/bp.8322206n.
      Monteoliva, A., García–Martínez, J. M. A., & Calvo–Salguero, A. (2016). Perceived benefits and costs of romantic relationships for young people: Differences by adult attachment style. The Journal of Psychology, 150(8), 931–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2016.1217190.
      Navarra, R. J., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Gottman Method couple therapy: From theory to practice. In D. K. Carson & M. Casado‐Kehoe (Eds.), Case studies in couples therapy: Theory‐based approaches (pp. 331–343). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
      Nichols, M. P. (1987). The self in the system: Expanding the limits of family therapy. Brunner/Mazel.
      Olson, D. H., Fournier, D. G., & Druckman, J. M. (1986). Counselors' manual for prepare/enrich (rev. ed.). Prepare/Enrich Inc.
      Peixoto‐Freitas, J., Rodríguez‐González, M., Crabtree, S. A., & Martins, M. V. (2020). Differentiation of self, couple adjustment and family life cycle: A cross‐sectional study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 48(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2020.1736689.
      Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
      Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Stress, coping, and social support processes in stepfamilies. In T. A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. American Psychological Association.
      Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult attachment measures: A 25‐year review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.006.
      Rober, P. (2009). Relational drawings in couple therapy. Family Process, 48, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01271.x.
      Rosenblatt, P. C., & Barner, J. R. (2006). The dance of closeness–distance in couple relationships after the death of a parent. OMEGA ‐ Journal of Death and Dying, 53(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.2190/X1W4-M210-6522-1034.
      Sandberg, J. G., Busby, D. M., Johnson, S. M., & Yoshida, K. (2012). The Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement (BARE) Scale: A tool for measuring attachment behavior in couple relationships. Family Process, 51(4), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01422.x.
      Schnarch, D. (1997). Passionate marriage: Love, sex, and intimacy in emotionally committed relationships. Norton.
      Schnarch, D., & Regas, S. (2012). The Crucible Differentiation Scale: Assessing differentiation in human relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00259.x.
      Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2014). Attachment bonds in romantic relationships. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 273–290). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14250-016.
      Skowron, E. A. (2000). The role of differentiation of self in marital adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.229.
      Snir, S., Egozi, S., Svorai, L., Tuch, R., & Shalev, O. (2023). Joint drawings as a tool for observing couple relationships: Development of the Couples' Closeness‐Distance Scale (CCDS). The Arts in Psychotherapy, 85, 102065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2023.102065.
      Snir, S., Gavron, T., Maor, Y., Haim, N., & Sharabany, R. (2020). Friends' closeness and intimacy from adolescence to adulthood: Art captures implicit relational representations in joint‐drawing: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573140.
      Snir, S., & Hazut, T. (2012). Observing the relationship: Couple patterns reflected in joint paintings. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 39(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2011.10.001.
      Snir, S., Regev, D., & Shaashua, Y. H. (2017). Relationships between attachment avoidance and anxiety and responses to art materials. Art Therapy, 34(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2016.1270139.
      Snir, S., & Wiseman, H. (2010). Attachment in romantic couples and perceptions of a joint‐drawing session. The Family Journal, 18(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480710364318.
      Snir, S., & Wiseman, H. (2013). Relationship patterns of connectedness and individuality in couples as expressed in the couple joint‐drawing method. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.07.005.
      Snir, S., & Wiseman, H. (2015). Joint‐drawing interpersonal recall in insecurely attached couples. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 44, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2014.12.001.
      Snir, S., & Wiseman, H. (2016). Couples' joint‐drawing patterns: Associations with self‐report measures of interpersonal patterns and attachment styles. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 48, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2015.12.006.
      Snyder, D. K., Heyman, R. E., Haynes, S. N., Carlson, C. I., & Balderrama‐Durbin, C. (2019). Couple and family assessment. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater‐Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Family therapy and training (pp. 35–51). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000101-003.
      Story, L. B., & Bradbury, T. N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1139–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.10.002.
      Strauss, B., Altmann, U., Schönherr, D., Schurig, S., Singh, S., & Petrowski, K. (2022). Is there an elephant in the room? A study of convergences and divergences of adult attachment measures commonly used in clinical studies. Psychotherapy Research, 32, 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.2020930.
      Wang, K., Li, F., Xu, J., Chen, S., & Zhou, M. (2022). Insecure attachment maymay not hamper relationships: A dyadic fit perspective. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04005-x.
      Wilson, J. M., & Wilkinson, R. B. (2012). The self‐report assessment of adolescent attachment: A systematic review and critique. Journal of Relationships Research, 3, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2012.7.
      Wiseman, H., & Tishby, O. (2017). Applying relationship anecdotes paradigm interviews to study client‐therapist relationship narratives: Core conflictual relationship theme analyses. Psychotherapy Research, 27(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1271958.
    • Grant Information:
      75300 Tel Hai college research authority
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: couples' closeness–distance dynamics; couples' relationships; evaluation; joint‐drawing
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240403 Date Completed: 20240704 Latest Revision: 20240704
    • Publication Date:
      20240704
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/jmft.12701
    • Accession Number:
      38567695