Establishing case volume benchmarks for ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery of the spine fellowship training.

Publisher: Elsevier Science Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101130732 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-1632 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15299430 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Spine J Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: New York, NY : Elsevier Science Inc., c2001-

Benchmarking* ; Orthopedics*/education ; Orthopedics*/standards ; Fellowships and Scholarships*/statistics & numerical data ; Fellowships and Scholarships*/standards; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Accreditation/standards ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Education, Medical, Graduate/standards ; Orthopedic Procedures/education ; Orthopedic Procedures/standards ; Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data ; Adult ; Spine/surgery ; Internship and Residency/standards ; Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Female

Background Context: There has been increasing scrutiny on the standardization of surgical training in the US.
Purpose: This study provides case volume benchmarks for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowship training.
Study Design/setting: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of fellows at ACGME-accredited orthopedic spine surgery fellowships (2017-2022).
Patient Sample: N/A.
Outcome Measures: Reported case volume during fellowship training.
Methods: Case volume percentiles were calculated across ACGME-defined case categories and temporal changes assessed via linear regression. Variability between the highest and lowest deciles by case volume was calculated as fold-differences (90th percentile/10th percentile). Sensitivity analyses were performed to identify potential targets for case minimum requirements.
Results: A total of 163 spine surgery fellows were included in this study. Total mean reported spine surgery case volume increased from 313.2±122 in 2017 to 382.0±164 in 2022 (p=.19). Most cases were classified as adult (range, 97.2%-98.0%) over pediatric cases (range, 2.0%-2.8%). An average of 322.0 cases were reported and most were classified as laminectomy (32%), posterior arthrodesis (29%), and anterior arthrodesis (20%). Overall variability in total case volume was 2.4 and the greatest variability existed for posterior instrumentation (38.1), application of cage (34.6), anterior instrumentation (20.8), and fractures and dislocations (17.3). If case minimum requirements for total reported cases was assumed at 200 cases, then all spine fellows included in this study would achieve this requirement. However, if case minimum requirements were assumed at 250 total cases, then approximately thirty percent of fellows (n=49) would not achieve this requirement for graduation.
Conclusions: Increasingly, national societies and accrediting bodies for surgical education recognize the need for standardized training. This study provides benchmarks to inform potential case minimum requirements and help reduce variability during spine fellowship training. Future studies are needed to establish case minimum requirements for spine surgery fellowship training across comprehensive and granular case categories that cover the full gamut of orthopedic spine surgery.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Keywords: ACGME; Case volume; Fellowship; Orthopaedic; Spine

Date Created: 20240330 Date Completed: 20240717 Latest Revision: 20240717

20240718

10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.014

38554735