Getting ahead in the social sciences: How parenthood and publishing contribute to gender gaps in academic career advancement.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0373126 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-4446 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00071315 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Br J Sociol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: London : published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science
      Original Publication: London, Published by Routledge & Kegan Paul for London, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      How do parenthood and publishing contribute to gender gaps in academic career advancement? While extensive research examines the causes of gender disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers, we know much less about the factors that constrain women's advancement in the social sciences. Combining detailed career- and administrative register data on 976 Danish social scientists in Business and Management, Economics, Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology (5703 person-years) that obtained a PhD degree between 2000 and 2015, we estimate gender differences in attainment of senior research positions and parse out how publication outputs, parenthood and parental leave contribute to these differences. Our approach is advantageous over previous longitudinal studies in that we track the careers and publication outputs of graduates from the outset of their PhD education and match this data with time-sensitive information on each individual's publication activities and family situation. In discrete time-event history models, we observe a ∼24 per cent female disadvantage in advancement likelihoods within the first 7 years after PhD graduation, with gender differences increasing over the observation period. A decomposition indicates that variations in publishing, parenthood and parental leave account for ∼ 40 per cent of the gender gap in career advancement, suggesting that other factors, including recruitment disparities, asymmetries in social capital and experiences of unequal treatment at work, may also constrain women's careers.
      (© 2024 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.)
    • References:
      Aagaard, K. (2017). The evolution of a national research funding system: Transformative change through layering and displacement. Minerva, 55(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024‐017‐9317‐1.
      Acker, J. (2010). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002.
      Aksnes, D. W., Kahn, S. R., Rune, B., & Ulvestad, M. E. (2022). Longitudinal evidence on Norwegian PhDs suggests slower progression for women academics but not a leaky pipeline. SocArxiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/pvx8q.
      Allgood, S., Badgett, L., Bayer, A., Bertrand, M., Black, S. E., Bloom, N., & Cook, L. D. (2019). AEA professional climate survey: Final report. American Economic Association Committee on Equity, Diversity and Professional Conduct.
      Allison, P. D. (2014). Event history and survival analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Vol. 46). SAGE publications.
      Antecol, H., Kelly, B., & Stearns, J. (2018). Equal but inequitable: Who benefits from gender‐neutral tenure clock stopping policies? The American Economic Review, 108(9), 2420–2441. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160613.
      Astin, H. S. (1967). Factors associated with the participation of women doctorates in the labor force. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 46(3), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164‐4918.1967.tb03178.x.
      Balafoutas, L., & Sutter, M. (2012). Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Science, 335(6068), 579–582. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211180.
      Bataille, P., Feuvre, N. Le, & Morales, S. K. (2017). Should I stay or should I go? The effects of precariousness on the gendered career aspirations of postdocs in Switzerland. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116673372.
      Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. McGraw‐Hill Education.
      Belle, D., Smith‐Doerr, L., & O’Brien, L. M. (2014). Gendered networks: Professional connections of science and engineering faculty. In Gender transformation in the academy. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
      Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer‐reviewed journals. Journal of informetrics, 7(4), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001.
      Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full‐time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778920.
      Bozzon, R., Murgia, A., Poggio, B., & Rapetti, E. (2017). Work–life interferences in the early stages of academic careers: The case of precarious researchers in Italy. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116669364.
      Briscoe‐Palmer, S., & Mattocks, K. (2021). Career development and progression of early career academics in political science: A gendered perspective. Political Studies Review, 19(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920925664.
      Carlsson, M., Finseraas, H., Midtbøen, A. H., & Linda Rafnsdóttir, G. (2021). Gender bias in academic recruitment? Evidence from a survey experiment in the nordic region. European Sociological Review, 37(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa050.
      Casad, B. J., Garasky, C. E., Jancetic, T. R., Brown, A. K., Franks, J. E., & Bach, C. R. (2022). US women faculty in the social sciences also face gender inequalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756.
      Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2015). Women have substantial advantage in STEM faculty hiring, except when competing against more‐accomplished men. Frontiers in Psychology, 1532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01532.
      Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.
      Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942.
      Danell, R., & Hjerm, M. (2013). Career prospects for female university researchers have not improved. Scientometrics, 94(3), 999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192‐012‐0840‐4.
      Drange, I., Pietilä, M., Reisel, L., & Silander, C. (2023). Advancing women’s representation in top academic positions–what works? Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 877–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2172563.
      Eagly, A. H. (2020). Do the social roles that women and men occupy in science allow equal access to publication? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(11), 5553–5555. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001684117.
      European Commission. (2021). She figures 2021. Publications Office of the European Union.
      Flory, J. A., Leibbrandt, A., & List, J. A. (2015). Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large‐scale natural field experiment on job entry decisions. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1), 122–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu030.
      Fox, M. F., & Gaughan, M. (2022). Gender, family and caregiving leave, and advancement in academic science: Effects across the life course. Sustainability, 13(12), 6820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126820.
      Frølich, N., Wendt, K., Reymert, I., Tellmann, S. M., Elken, M., Kyvik, S., Vabø, A., & Larsen, E. H. (2018). Academic career structures in Europe: Perspectives from Norway, Denmark, Sweden. Finland.
      Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2009). Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973‐2001. In Science and engineering careers in the United States: An analysis of markets and employment (pp. 163–194). University of Chicago Press.
      Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2014a). Women’s careers in academic social science: Progress, pitfalls, and plateaus. In A. Lanteri & J. Vromen (Eds.), The economics of economists. Cambridge University Press.
      Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2014b). Women in economics: Moving up or falling off the academic career ladder? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162386.
      Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716211416925.
      Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. H. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162‐017‐9454‐2.
      Heckman, J. J., & Moktan, S. (2020). Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2), 419–470. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191574.
      Hengel, E. (2022). Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. The Economic Journal, 132(648), 2951–2991. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac032.
      Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A.‐L. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609–4616. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914221117.
      Hunter, L. A., & Leahey, E. (2010). Parenting and research productivity: New evidence and methods. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709358472.
      Husu, L. (2000). Gender discrimination in the promised land of gender equality. Higher Education in Europe, 25(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/713669257.
      Jerolmack, C., & Khan, S. (2014). Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523396.
      Karlson, K. B., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same‐sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 286–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012444861.
      Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Egholt Søgaard, J. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180010.
      Leahey, E. (2007). Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200403.
      Leišytė, L. (2016). New public management and research productivity–a precarious state of affairs of academic work in The Netherlands. Studies in Higher Education, 41(5), 828–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1147721.
      Lund, R. (2012). Publishing to become an ‘ideal academic’: An institutional ethnography and a feminist critique. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.003.
      Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980–2013. Research Policy, 45(5), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019.
      Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2020). Is there a motherhood penalty in academia? The gendered effect of children on academic publications in German sociology. European Sociological Review, 36(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz063.
      Lutter, M., Habicht, I. M., & Schröder, M. (2022). Gender differences in the determinants of becoming a professor in Germany. An event history analysis of academic psychologists from 1980 to 2019. Research Policy, 51(6), 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104506.
      Madison, G., & Fahlman, P. (2021). Sex differences in the number of scientific publications and citations when attaining the rank of professor in Sweden. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2506–2527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1723533.
      Madsen, E. B., & Aagaard, K. (2020). Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1159–1181. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00077.
      Madsen, E. B., Nielsen, M. W., Bjørnholm, J., Jagsi, R., & Andersen, J. P. (2022). Author‐level data confirm the widening gender gap in publishing rates during COVID‐19. Elife, 11, e76559. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.76559.
      Mairesse, J., & Pezzoni, M. (2015). Does gender affect scientific productivity? A critical review of the empirical evidence and a panel data econometric analysis for French physicists. Revue Économique, 66(1), 65–113. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.661.0065.
      Marini, G., & Meschitti, V. (2018). The trench warfare of gender discrimination: Evidence from academic promotions to full professor in Italy. Scientometrics, 115(2), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192‐018‐2696‐8.
      Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Yi, Vani Rayasam, G., Stavreva, D. A., & Cohen‐Fix, O. (2007). Falling off the academic bandwagon: Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO Reports, 8(11), 977–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110.
      Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. Rutgers University Press.
      McDowell, J. M., Singell, L. D., Jr., & Ziliak, J. P. (1999). Cracks in the glass ceiling: Gender and promotion in the economics profession. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 392–396. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.392.
      McDowell, J. M., Singell, L. D., Jr., & Ziliak, J. P. (2001). Gender and promotion in the economics profession. ILR Review, 54(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696008.
      Morgan, A. C., Way, S. F., Hoefer, M. J. D., Larremore, D. B., Galesic, M., & Clauset, A. (2021). The unequal impact of parenthood in academia. Science Advances, 7(9), eabd1996. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1996.
      Murgia, A., & Poggio, B. (2018). Gender and precarious research careers. Routledge.
      Nelson, L. K., & Zippel, K. (2021). From theory to practice and back: How the concept of implicit bias was implemented in academe, and what this means for gender theories of organizational change. Gender & Society, 35(3), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211000335.
      Ni, C., Smith, E., Yuan, H., Vincent, L., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). The gendered nature of authorship. Science Advances, 7(36), eabe4639. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639.
      Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067.
      Nielsen, M. W. (2016). Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv052.
      Nielsen, M. W. (2017). Scandinavian approaches to gender equality in academia: A comparative study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(3), 295–318.
      Nielsen, M. W. (2018). Scientific performance assessments through a gender lens: A case study on evaluation and selection practices in academia. Science and Technology Studies, 31(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60610.
      O'Connor, P., & O'Hagan, C. (2016). Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: A problematic reality? Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1943–1957. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.1000292.
      OECD. (2023). PF2. 2: Parents’ use of childbirth‐related leave. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/PF2‐2‐Use‐childbirth‐leave.pdf.
      Orupabo, J., & Mangset, M. (2022). Promoting diversity but striving for excellence: Opening the ‘Black Box’of academic hiring. Sociology, 56(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211028064.
      O’Laughlin, E. M., & Bischoff, L. G. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academia: Work/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x04265942.
      Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745‐9125.1998.tb01268.x.
      Ross, M. B., Glennon, B. M., Murciano‐Goroff, R., Berkes, E. G., Weinberg, B. A., & Lane, J. I. (2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, 608(7921), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586‐022‐04966‐w.
      Rossi, A. S. (1965). Women in science: Why so few? Social and psychological influences restrict women's choice and pursuit of careers in science. Science, 148(3674), 1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3674.1196.
      Rostgaard, T., & Ejrnæs, A. (2021). How different parental leave schemes create different take‐up patterns: Denmark in nordic comparison. Social Inclusion, 9(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i2.3870.
      Sapiro, V., & Campbell, D. (2018). Report on the 2017 APSA survey on sexual harassment at annual meetings. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096517002104.
      Schiebinger, L. L., Henderson, A. D., & Gilmartin, S. K. (2008). Dual‐career academic couples: What universities need to know. Michelle R. Clayman institute for gender research, Stanford University.
      Schröder, M., Lutter, M., & Habicht, I. M. (2021). Publishing, signaling, social capital, and gender: Determinants of becoming a tenured professor in German political science. PLoS One, 16(1), e0243514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243514.
      Seierstad, C., & Healy, G. (2012). Women’s equality in the scandinavian academy: A distant dream? Work, Employment & Society, 26(2), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017011432918.
      Sherman, M. G., & Tookes, H. E. (2022). Female representation in the academic finance profession. The Journal of Finance, 77(1), 317–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13094.
      Stage, A. K., & Aagaard, K. (2020). National policies as drivers of organizational change in universities: A string of reinforcing reforms. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 849–871.
      Timmers, T. M. W., Tineke, M., & Tijdens, K. G. (2010). Gender diversity policies in universities: A multi‐perspective framework of policy measures. Higher Education, 59(6), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734‐009‐9276‐z.
      van den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of science: Gender practices in the recruitment and selection of professors in The Netherlands. Amsterdam University Press.
      van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293.
      van Leeuwen, T. N., & Moed, H. F. (2012). Funding decisions, peer review, and scientific excellence in physical sciences, chemistry, and geosciences. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs009.
      Villanueva‐Felez, A., Woolley, R., & Cañibano, C. (2015). Nanotechnology researchers’ collaboration relationships: A gender analysis of access to scientific information. Social Studies of Science, 45(1), 100–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714552347.
      Vincent‐Lancrin, S. (2008). The reversal of gender inequalities in higher education: An on‐going trend. Higher Education, 2030(1), 265–298.
      Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052.
      Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 5360–5365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418878112.
      Xie, Yu, & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657505.
      Xie, Yu, & Shauman, K. A. (2005). Women in science. Harvard University Press.
      Zhao, X., Akbaritabar, A., Kashyap, R., & Zagheni, E. (2023). A gender perspective on the global migration of scholars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(10), e2214664120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214664120.
    • Grant Information:
      9130-00029B Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: career progression; gender; parenthood; scientific performance; social sciences
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240329 Date Completed: 20240601 Latest Revision: 20240601
    • Publication Date:
      20240602
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/1468-4446.13088
    • Accession Number:
      38549173