References: Venkatakrishnan, K. & van der Graaf, P.H. Model‐informed drug development: connecting the dots with a totality of evidence mindset to advance therapeutics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 1147–1154 (2021).
Madabushi, R., Seo, P., Zhao, L., Tegenge, M. & Zhu, H. Review: role of model‐informed drug development approaches in the lifecycle of drug development and regulatory decision‐making. Pharm. Res. 39, 1669–1680 (2022).
Madabushi, R. et al. The US Food and Drug Administration's model‐informed drug development paired meeting pilot program: early experience and impact. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 106, 74–78 (2019).
Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Madabushi, R., Liu, Q., Huang, S.M. & Zineh, I. Model‐informed drug development: current US regulatory practice and future considerations. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 105, 899–911 (2019).
Jain, L., Mehrotra, N., Wenning, L. & Sinha, V. PDUFA VI: it is time to unleash the full potential of model‐informed drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 8, 5–8 (2019).
Marshall, S. et al. Model‐informed drug discovery and development: current industry good practice and regulatory expectations and future perspectives. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 8, 87–96 (2019).
Krishnaswami, S. et al. MID3: Mission impossible or model‐informed drug discovery and development? Point‐counterpoint discussions on key challenges. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 107, 762–772 (2020).
Chan, J.R. et al. Current practices for QSP model assessment: an IQ consortium survey. J. Pharmacokinet. Pharmacodyn. 11, 1–13 (2022).
United States, Food and Drug Administration. Pilot meetings program for model informed drug development. 83 FR 16868 (2018). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/04/17/2018‐08010/pilot‐meetings‐program‐for‐model‐informed‐drug‐development‐approaches.
Lesko, L.J. Perspective on model‐informed drug development. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 10, 1127–1129 (2021).
Madabushi, R., Benjamin, J., Zhu, H. & Zineh, I. 2024. The US Food and Drug Administration's model‐informed drug development meeting program: from pilot to pathway. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 116, 278–281 (2024).
Galluppi, G.R. et al. Industrial perspective on the benefits realized from the FDA's model‐informed drug development paired meeting pilot program. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 1172–1175 (2021).
United States, Food and Drug Administration. Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 2023 VII meetings program for model informed drug development approaches. 88 FR 1597 (2023). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/11/2023‐00389/prescription‐drug‐user‐fee‐act‐of‐2023‐vii‐meetings‐program‐for‐model‐informed‐drug‐development.
FDA model‐informed drug development paired meeting program. (Accessed December 5, 2023).
United States Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: interacting with the FDA on complex innovative trial designs for drugs and biological products. https://www.fda.gov/media/130897/download (Accessed December 20, 2020).
Anziano, R.J. & Milligan, P.A. Model informed drug development: collaboration through a common framework. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 110, 1165–1167 (2021).
Model‐informed drug development paired meeting program. (Accessed February 12, 2024).
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Assessing credibility of computational modeling through verification and validation: application to medical devices (2018). ASME Standard, V&V 40–2018 p. 60. (Accessed February 12, 2024).
Kuemmel, C. et al. Consideration of a credibility assessment framework in model‐informed drug development: potential application to physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 9, 21–28 (2020).
Nijsen, M.J.M.A. et al. Preclinical QSP modeling in the pharmaceutical industry: an IQ consortium survey examining the current landscape. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 7, 135–146 (2018).
No Comments.