A multidimensional approach to identifying high-performing trauma centers across the United States.

Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101570622 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2163-0763 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21630755 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

Trauma Centers*/standards ; Trauma Centers*/statistics & numerical data ; Wounds, Gunshot*/mortality ; Quality Improvement*; Humans ; United States ; Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data ; Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control ; Adult ; Hospital Mortality ; Failure to Rescue, Health Care/statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Female

Introduction: The differentiators of centers performing at the highest level of quality and patient safety are likely both structural and cultural. We aimed to combine five indicators representing established domains of trauma quality and to identify and describe the structural characteristics of consistently performing centers.
Methods: Using American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2020, we evaluated five quality measures across several care domains for adult patients in levels I and II trauma centers: (1) time to operating room for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds and shock, (2) proportion of patients receiving timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, (3) failure to rescue (death following a complication), (4) major hospital complications, and (5) mortality. Overall performance was summarized as a composite score incorporating all measures. Centers were ranked from highest to lowest performer. Principal component analysis showed the influence of each indicator on overall performance and supported the composite score approach.
Results: We identified 272 levels I and II centers, with 28 and 27 centers in the top and bottom 10%, respectively. Patients treated in high-performing centers had significant lower rates of death major complications and failure to rescue, compared with low-performing centers ( p < 0.001). The median time to operating room for gunshot wound was almost half that in high compared with low-performing centers, and rates of timely venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were over twofold greater ( p < 0.001). Top performing centers were more likely to be level I centers and cared for a higher number of severely injured patients per annum. Each indicator contributed meaningfully to the variation in scores and centers tended to perform consistently across most indicators.
Conclusion: The combination of multiple indicators across dimensions of quality sets a higher standard for performance evaluation and allows the discrimination of centers based on structural elements, specifically level 1 status, and trauma center volume.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic /Care Management; Level IV.
(Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hemmila MR, Nathens AB, Shafi S, Calland JF, Clark DE, Cryer HG, et al. The trauma quality improvement program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility. J Trauma . 2010;68(2):253–262.
Nathens AB, Cryer HG, Fildes J. The American College of Surgeons trauma quality improvement program. Surg Clin North Am . 2012;92(2):441–454 x-xi.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q . 1966;44((3)Suppl):166–206.
Ayanian JZ, Markel H. Donabedian's lasting framework for health care quality. N Engl J Med . 2016;375(3):205–207.
Nathens AB, Xiong W, Shafi S. Ranking of trauma center performance: the bare essentials. J Trauma . 2008;65(3):628–635.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century . Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2001. Copyright 2001 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol . 2008;61(4):344–349.
Shafi S, Nathens AB, Cryer GH, Hemmila MR, Pasquale MD, Clark DE, et al. The trauma quality improvement program of the American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma. J Am Coll Surg . 2009;209(4):521–530e1.
Thomas AC, Campbell BT, Subacius H, Bilimoria KY, Stey AM, Hamad D, et al. Time to OR for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: a potential process measure to assess the quality of trauma care? J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2022;92(4):708–716.
Ley EJ, Brown CV, Moore EE, Sava JA, Peck KA, Ciesla DJ, et al. Updated guidelines to reduce venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: a Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;89(5):971–981.
Haas B, Gomez D, Hemmila MR, Nathens AB. Prevention of complications and successful rescue of patients with serious complications: characteristics of high-performing trauma centers. J Trauma . 2011;70(3):575–582.
Guttman MP, Tillmann BW, Haas B, Nathens AB. Deaths following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy: opportunities for quality improvement? J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;89(4):743–751.
Ingraham AM, Xiong W, Hemmila MR, Shafi S, Goble S, Neal ML, et al. The attributable mortality and length of stay of trauma-related complications: a matched cohort study. Ann Surg . 2010;252(2):358–362.
Newgard CD, Fildes JJ, Wu L, Hemmila MR, Burd RS, Neal M, et al. Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons trauma quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg . 2013;216(1):147–157.
Austin PC, Goel V, van Walraven C. An introduction to multilevel regression models. Can J Public Health . 2001;92(2):150–154.
Austin PC, Merlo J. Intermediate and advanced topics in multilevel logistic regression analysis. Stat Med . 2017;36(20):3257–3277.
Austin PC. Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research. Commun Stat Simulation Comput . 2009;38(6):1228–1234.
Johnson SR, Glaman DD, Schentag CT, Lee P. Quality of life and functional status in systemic sclerosis compared to other rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol . 2006;33(6):1117–1122.
Ringnér M. What is principal component analysis? Nat Biotechnol . 2008;26(3):303–304.
Witteveen E, Wieske L, van der Poll T, van der Schaaf M, van Schaik IN, Schultz MJ, et al. Increased early systemic inflammation in ICU-acquired weakness; a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Care Med . 2017;45(6):972–979.
O’Brien ML. Examining the dimensionality of pathological narcissism: factor analysis and construct validity of the O'Brien multiphasic narcissism inventory. Psychol Rep . 1987;61(2):499–510.
O’Brien K. Factor analysis: an overview in the field of measurement. Physiother Can . 2007;59(2):142–155.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use . United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Bro R, Smilde AK. Principal component analysis. Anal Methods . 2014;6(9):2812–2831.
Tobias S, Carlson JE. Brief report: Bartlett's test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res . 1969;4(3):375–377.
Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Australasian J Paramed . 2010;8:1–13.
Moore L, Lavoie A, Bourgeois G, Lapointe J. Donabedian's structure-process-outcome quality of care model: validation in an integrated trauma system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2015;78(6):1168–1175.
Moore L, Lavoie A, Sirois M-J, Belcaid A, Bourgeois G, Lapointe J, et al. A comparison of methods to obtain a composite performance indicator for evaluating clinical processes in trauma care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2013;74(5):1344–1350.
Glance LG, Dick AW, Meredith JW, Mukamel DB. Variation in hospital complication rates and failure-to-rescue for trauma patients. Ann Surg . 2011;253(4):811–816.
Santana MJ, Stelfox HT. Development and evaluation of evidence-informed quality indicators for adult injury care. Ann Surg . 2014;259(1):186–192.
Nathens AB, Jurkovich GJ, Maier RV, Grossman DC, MacKenzie EJ, Moore M, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA . 2001;285(9):1164–1171.
Bennett KM, Vaslef S, Pappas TN, Scarborough JE. The volume-outcomes relationship for United States level I trauma centers. J Surg Res . 2011;167(1):19–23.
American College of Surgeons. American College of Surgeons Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient 2022 Standards. Chicago, IL; 2022. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/trauma/quality/verification-review-and-consultation-program/standards/ . Accessed July 13, 2023.
Demetriades D, Martin M, Salim A, Rhee P, Brown C, Chan L. The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Ann Surg . 2005;242(4):512–517 discussion 517-519.
Dzau VJ, Shine KI. Two decades since to err is human: progress, but still a “chasm”. JAMA . 2020;324(24):2489–2490.
Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA . 1988;260(12):1743–1748.
Wears R, Sutcliffe K. Still Not Safe: Patient Safety and the Middle-Managing of American Medicine . Oxford University Press; 2019.
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Ramanadhan S, Rowe L, Nembhard IM, Krumholz HM. Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implement Sci . 2009;4:25.
Baxter R, Taylor N, Kellar I, Lawton R. A qualitative positive deviance study to explore exceptionally safe care on medical wards for older people. BMJ Quality & Safety . 2019;28(8):618–626.
Hughes L, Sheard L, Pinkney L, Lawton RL. Excellence in elective hip and knee surgery: what does it look like? A positive deviance approach. J Health Serv Res Policy . 2020;25(1):5–12.
Sreeramoju P, Dura L, Fernandez ME, Minhajuddin A, Simacek K, Fomby TB, et al. Using a positive deviance approach to influence the culture of patient safety related to infection prevention. In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases vol. 5. Oxford University Press US; 2018.
Vioque SM, Kim PK, McMaster J, Gallagher J, Allen SR, Holena DN, et al. Classifying errors in preventable and potentially preventable trauma deaths: a 9-year review using the Joint Commission's standardized methodology. Am J Surg . 2014;208(2):187–194.
LaGrone L, McIntyre L, Riggle A, Robinson BRH, Maier RV, Bulger E, et al. Changes in error patterns in unanticipated trauma deaths during 20 years: in pursuit of zero preventable deaths. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;89(6):1046–1053.
Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after to err is human: what have we learned? JAMA . 2005;293(19):2384–2390.
National Patient Safety Foundation (Expert Panel). Free from Harm: Accelerating Patient Safety Improvement Fifteen Years after To Err Is Human . Boston, MA: National Patient Safety Foundation; 2015.
Shojania KG, Thomas EJ. Trends in adverse events over time: why are we not improving? BMJ Qual Saf . 2013;22(4):273–277.
Haas B, Gomez D, Zagorski B, Stukel TA, Rubenfeld GD, Nathens AB. Survival of the fittest: the hidden cost of undertriage of major trauma. J Am Coll Surg . 2010;211(6):804–11.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Network. Culture of Safety. Patient Safety Primer. Available at: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/culture-safety . Accessed June 3, 2023.
Chassin MR, Loeb JM. High-reliability health care: getting there from here. Milbank Q . 2013;91(3):459–490.
Sutcliffe KM. High reliability organizations (HROs). Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol . 2011;25(2):133–144.

Date Created: 20240314 Date Completed: 20240625 Latest Revision: 20240625

20240625

10.1097/TA.0000000000004313

38480489