Pharmacogenomic allele coverage of genome-wide genotyping arrays: a comparative analysis.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101231005 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-6880 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17446872 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pharmacogenet Genomics Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, c2005-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The use of genome-wide genotyping arrays in pharmacogenomics (PGx) research and clinical implementation applications is increasing but it is unclear which arrays are best suited for these applications. Here, we conduct a comparative coverage analysis of PGx alleles included on genome-wide genotyping arrays, with an emphasis on alleles in genes with PGx-based prescribing guidelines. Genomic manifest files for seven arrays including the Axiom Precision Medicine Diversity Array (PMDA), Axiom PMDA Plus, Axiom PangenomiX, Axiom PangenomiX Plus, Infinium Global Screening Array, Infinium Global Diversity Array (GDA) and Infinium GDA with enhanced PGx (GDA-PGx) Array, were evaluated for coverage of 523 star alleles across 19 pharmacogenes included in prescribing guidelines developed by the Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Specific attention was given to coverage of the Association of Molecular Pathology's Tier 1 and Tier 2 allele sets for CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, NUDT15, TPMT and VKORC1 . Coverage of the examined PGx alleles was highest for the Infinium GDA-PGx (88%), Axiom PangenomiX Plus (77%), Axiom PangenomiX (72%) and Axiom PMDA Plus (70%). Three arrays (Infinium GDA-PGx, Axiom PangenomiX Plus and Axiom PMDA Plus) fully covered the Tier 1 alleles and the Axiom PangenomiX array provided full coverage of Tier 2 alleles. In conclusion, PGx allele coverage varied by gene and array. A superior array for all PGx applications was not identified. Future comparative analyses of genotype data produced by these arrays are needed to determine the robustness of the reported coverage estimates.
      (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
    • References:
      McInnes G, Yee SW, Pershad Y, Altman RB. Genomewide association studies in pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 110:637–648.
      Gamazon ER, Skol AD, Perera MA. The limits of genome-wide methods for pharmacogenomic testing. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2012; 22:261–272.
      Verlouw JAM, Clemens E, de Vries JH, Zolk O, Verkerk AJMH, Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A, et al. A comparison of genotyping arrays. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:1611–1624.
      Lemieux Perreault LP, Zaïd N, Cameron M, Mongrain I, Dubé MP. Pharmacogenetic content of commercial genome-wide genotyping arrays. Pharmacogenomics 2018; 19:1159–1167.
      PharmGKB. AMP’s Minimum Sets of Alleles for PGx Testing. PharmGKB; 2023. https://www.pharmgkb.org/ampAllelesToTest . [Accessed 17 August 2023].
      Pratt VM, Del Tredici AL, Hachad H, Ji Y, Kalman LV, Scott SA, et al. Recommendations for clinical CYP2C19 genotyping allele selection: a report of the association for molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn 2018; 20:269–276.
      Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Del Tredici AL, Hachad H, Ji Y, Moyer AM, et al. Recommendations for clinical CYP2C9 genotyping allele selection: a joint recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn 2019; 21:746–755.
      Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Del Tredici AL, Hachad H, Ji Y, Kalman LV, et al. Recommendations for clinical warfarin genotyping allele selection: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology and the College of American Pathologists. J Mol Diagn 2020; 22:847–859.
      Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Del Tredici AL, Gaedigk A, Hachad H, Ji Y, et al. Recommendations for clinical CYP2D6 genotyping allele selection: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, and the European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy. J Mol Diagn 2021; 23:1047–1064.
      Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Fulmer ML, Gaedigk A, Hachad H, Ji Y, et al. TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping recommendations: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, College of American Pathologists, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy, and Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase. J Mol Diagn 2022; 24:1051–1063.
      Pratt VM, Cavallari LH, Fulmer ML, Gaedigk A, Hachad H, Ji Y, et al. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotyping recommendations: a joint consensus recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, College of American Pathologists, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy, and Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:619–629.
      Illumina. Infinium Global Diversity Array Product Files. 2021. https://support.illumina.com/array/array_kits/infinium-global-diversity-array/product-files.html . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      Illumina. Infinium Global Diversity Array with Enhanced PGx Product Files. 2023. https://support.illumina.com/array/array_kits/infinium-global-diversity-pgx/product-files.html . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      Illumina. Infinium Global Screening Array Product Files. 2013. https://support.illumina.com/array/array_kits/infinium-global-screening-array/downloads.html . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      ThermoFisher Scientific. Axiom Precision Medicine Diversity Array Plus Kit, 96-format. 2019. https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/951961 . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      ThermoFisher Scientific. Axiom PangenomiX Array. 2023. https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/GSD/Datasheets/axiom_pangenomix_array_datasheet.pdf . [Accessed 21 November 2023].
      Gaedigk A, Whirl-Carrillo M, Pratt VM, Miller NA, Klein TE. PharmVar and the landscape of pharmacogenetic resources. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 107:43–46.
      Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh E, Hebert J, Gong L, Sangkuhl K, Thorn C, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 92:414–417.
      PharmVar. PharmVar. https://www.pharmvar.org/gene/CYP2C19 . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      20 dbSNP - NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ . [Accessed 24September 2023].
      National Center for Biotectnology Information. rs1554854495 RefSNP Report – dbSNP . 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs1554854495 . [Accessed 24 September 2023].
      PharmGKB. PharmGKB. https://www.pharmgkb.org/ . [Accessed 3 May 2023].
      Erlichster M, Goudey B, Skafidas E, Kwan P. Cross-ethnicity tagging SNPs for HLA alleles associated with adverse drug reaction. Pharmacogenomics J 2019; 19:230–239.
      Arnold K, Gosling J, Holmes D. The Java programming language. Addison Wesley Professional; 2005.
      R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2016. https://www.R-project.org/ . [Accessed 5 May 2023].
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20240215 Date Completed: 20240429 Latest Revision: 20240429
    • Publication Date:
      20240429
    • Accession Number:
      10.1097/FPC.0000000000000523
    • Accession Number:
      38359167