Spatial disparities and internal subsystems'coupling coordination analysis of green development in Chinese animal husbandry.

Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9441769 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1614-7499 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09441344 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: <2013->: Berlin : Springer
Original Publication: Landsberg, Germany : Ecomed

Animal Husbandry* ; Sustainable Development*; Animals ; Beijing ; China ; Cities ; Economic Development ; Spatial Analysis

This study establishes an indicator system encompassing economic, social, and environmental dimensions to assess the level of green development in animal husbandry from 2010 to 2020. It further examines the coupling coordination degree within each dimension. The Dagum Gini coefficient is employed to scrutinize the regional disparities in coupling coordination degree of the economic benefit, social benefit, and environmental benefit of the green development in Chinese animal husbandry. Additionally, Moran's I is utilized to identify the degree of spatial autocorrelation and aggregation types. The results demonstrate the following: (1) From 2010 to 2020, the level of green development in the animal husbandry in China has steadily improved. Among the three dimensions, economic benefits exhibit the highest performance, followed by environmental benefits and social benefits. There are obvious regional disparities in the green development of animal husbandry, which are "strong in north and weak in south" and "strong in west and weak in east." The Gini coefficient for green development in the animal husbandry in China experienced a fluctuating upward trend. (2) From 2010 to 2020, the overall coupling coordination degree of the economic benefit, social benefit, and environmental benefit of green development in the animal husbandry in China remains at a rudimentary level and demonstrates a steady upward trend. Spatially, it manifests an agglomeration pattern primarily centered around Beijing, with the northeastern region being the main focus. (3) The Gini coefficient for the coupling coordination degree experienced a slight fluctuating upward trend. In terms of inter-regional disparities, significant differences are observed between the northeastern region and the central region, as well as between the northeastern region and the eastern region. In terms of contribution to disparities, inter-regional contributions were the most substantial, followed by super-variable density, with intra-regional contributions being the smallest. (4) The coupling coordination degree displayed spatial autocorrelation, with "high-high" aggregation areas predominantly concentrated in the northeastern region.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Chai Z, Tian M, Yao F (2023) The impact of internet use on production efficiency of animal husbandry: based on the evidence of 340 herdsmen in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability-Basel 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107955.
Chen W, Guan L, Huang R et al (2019) Sustainable development of animal husbandry in China. Bull Chin Acad Sci 34:135–144. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.02.002 . (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2019.02.002)
Chen B, Xu X (2023) The north-south gap and spillover effect of Chinese service industry green development. Front Ecol Evol 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1094646.
Chen C, Zhang H (2023) Evaluation of green development level of Mianyang agriculture, based on the entropy weight method. Sustainability-Basel 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097589.
Cheng M, Yao W (2022) Trend prediction of carbon peak in China’s animal husbandry based on the empirical analysis of 31 provinces in China. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02794-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s10668-022-02794-6351259388809240)
Du G, Xie J, Hou D, Yu F (2023) Regional differences in the green use level of cultivated land in the Heilongjiang reclamation area. Front Environ Sci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1134271.
Fang G, Bailey SC, Annis IE et al (2020) Effects of estimated community-level health literacy on treatment initiation and preventive care among older adults with newly diagnosed diabetes. Patient Prefer Adher 14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S211784. (PMID: 10.2147/PPA.S211784)
Feng C, Huang J, Wang M (2018) Analysis of green total-factor productivity in China’s regional metal industry: a meta-frontier approach. Resour Policy 58:219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.008)
Guo X, Huang S, Wang Y (2020) Influence of agricultural mechanization development on agricultural green transformation in western China, based on the ml index and spatial panel model. Math Probl Eng 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6351802.
Guo H, Yi X, Pan C, Yang B, Li Y (2021) Analysis on the temporal and spatial features of the coupling and coordination of industrialization and agricultural green development in China during 1990–2019. Int J Env Res Pub He 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168320.
Han Z, Han C, Yang C (2020a) Spatial econometric analysis of environmental total factor productivity of animal husbandry and its influencing factors in China during 2001–2017. Sci Total Environ 723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137726.
Han C, Wang G, Zhang Y, Song L, Zhu L (2020b) Analysis of the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics and influencing factors of China’s herbivorous animal husbandry industry. Plos One 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237827.
Han X, Wang Y, Yu W, Xia X (2023) Coupling and coordination between green finance and agricultural green development: evidence from China. Financ Res Lett 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104221.
Hao D, Wang R, Gao C, Song X, Liu W, Hu G (2022) Spatial-temporal characteristics and influence factors of carbon emission from livestock industry in China. Int J Env Res Pub He 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214837.
Hu R, Xu W (2022) Exploring the technological changes of green agriculture in China: evidence from patent data (1998–2021). Sustainability-Basel 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710899.
Jin S, Han D, Wu N (2018) Evaluation on prevention policies for livestock and poultry pollution in Chinese livestock and poultry farming. Issues Agric Econ 119–126. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2018.03.013 (in Chinese).
Li H, Zhao M, Lu Q (2021a) Does the livestock and poultry restricted zone policy reduce China’s pig production capacity?. Issues Agric Econ 12–27. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2021.08.003 (in Chinese).
Li Z, Jin M, Cheng J (2021b) Economic growth of green agriculture and its influencing factors in China: based on emergy theory and spatial econometric model. Environ Dev Sustain 23:15494–15512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01307-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s10668-021-01307-1)
Li C, Song L (2022) Regional differences and spatial convergence of green development in China. Sustainability-Basel 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148511.
Liang K, Li Z, Luo L (2023a) Measurement, dynamic evolution and influencing factors of green development efficiency in western China: based on ecological-economic-social system. Plos One 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290472.
Liang L, Huai H, Tang X (2023b) Evaluation and driving factors analysis of agricultural green development level in Beijing from 1978 to 2022. Front Ecol Evol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1233388.
Liu X, Xin Y (2022) Exploring the characteristics and driving factors of coupling coordination of regional sustainable development: evidence from China’s 31 provinces. Environ Sci Pollut R 29:71075–71099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20792-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-022-20792-z)
Lu X, Ke N, Kuang B (2020) Regional differences and influencing factors of China’s grain production capacity. Chin Land Sci 34:53–62. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20200629.101227.
Miao L, Sun Z, Cui X, Veuthey J (2018) Wake up “boiling frogs”: a study on animal husbandry under climate change in northern China. Environ Earth Sci 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7639-4.
Shi R, Irfan M, Liu G, Yang X, Su X (2022) Analysis of the impact of livestock structure on carbon emissions of animal husbandry: a sustainable way to improving public health and green environment. Front Public Health 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.835210.
Sun C, Tong Y, Zou W (2018) The evolution and a temporal-spatial difference analysis of green development in China. Sustain Cities Soc 41:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.006)
Wang J, Lan Z, Tian F, Zhang X (2012) Influence and strategies of economic crisis on China’s livestock farming. J Anim Vet Adv 11:1096–1099. (PMID: 10.3923/javaa.2012.1096.1099)
Wang M (2018) China’s livestock industry development: achievements, experiences, and future trends. Issues Agric Econ 60–70. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2018.08.007 (in Chinese).
Wang S (2022) The positive effect of green agriculture development on environmental optimization: measurement and impact mechanism. Front Environ Sci 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1035867.
Weng Q, Qin Q, Li L (2020) A comprehensive evaluation paradigm for regional green development based on “five-circle model”: a case study from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei. J Clean Prod 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124076.
Xiong X, Xiong H, Ma X, Sun Y, Yang C (2022) Spatial difference and dynamic evolution of high-quality development level of animal husbandry in China. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan 43:113–125. https://doi.org/10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20221213 (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20221213)
Xiong H, Xiong X, Wang M (2023) Measurement of China’s animal husbandry modernization development level and the diagnosis of obstacle factors. J Hunan Agric Univ (Soc Sci) 24:43–53, 85. https://doi.org/10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2023.01.006 . (in Chinese). (PMID: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau(ss).2023.01.006)
Xu L, Jiang J, Du J (2023) How do environmental regulations and financial support for agriculture affect agricultural green development? The mediating role of agricultural infrastructure. J Environ Plann Man. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2263637. (PMID: 10.1080/09640568.2023.2263637)
Yan J, Tang Z, Guan Y, Xie M, Huang Y (2023) Analysis of measurement, regional differences, convergence and dynamic evolutionary trends of the green production level in Chinese agriculture. Agriculture-Basel 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13102016.
Yu L, Xiong X, Samim SA, Hu Z (2021a) Analysis of water resources and water environmental carrying capacity of animal husbandry in China-based on water footprint theory. Water-Sui 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233386.
Yu F, Huang X, Wang G (2021b) High-quality development of animal husbandry: theoretical interpretation and realization path. Chin Rural Econ 85–99. (in Chinese).
Zhang W, Huang M, Shen P, Liu X (2023) Can digital inclusive finance promote agricultural green development? Environ Sci Pollut R. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29557-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-023-29557-8)
Zhao X, Xiong C (2022) Spatial and temporal characteristics, evolution law and improvement path of China’s animal husbandry production pattern. Sustainability-Basel 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315794.
Zhou L, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhang J (2023) A leading role of water resources and animal husbandry in environmental sustainability: a case study of China. Environ Sci Pollut R 30:72146–72159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26910-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s11356-023-26910-9)

71973105 National Natural Science Foundation of China; 20YJA790089 The Ministry of Education Research of Social Sciences Funded Projects; 2452020056 Research Funds for the Central Universities

Keywords: Animal husbandry; Coupling coordination; Dagum Gini coefficient; Green development; Moran’s I

Date Created: 20240214 Date Completed: 20240311 Latest Revision: 20240704

20240704

10.1007/s11356-024-32394-y

38353822